2026: The View Ahead
The team at Quickscribe hopes you had a wonderful holiday season surrounded by friends and family.
As we kick off the first week of January, we are excited about several projects currently in the works – all designed to make it easier for you to interpret and track relevant legislation and related developments. Key initiatives for the upcoming year include:
We hope to have some of these projects completed when the new parliamentary session begins on February 12th. It is expected that the government's first priority will be to amend the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA) following the recent Appeals Court ruling in British Columbia.
Quickscribe will continue to keep you updated on these and other critical legislative developments.
Happy New Year!
New Annotations have been added to Quickscribe:
If you wish to be alerted when new annotations are published by our contributors, select My Alerts via the top navigation, then select the "View Expert Annotators". Here you can view and "follow" any contributor from the list.
| Tip: Log in to Quickscribe Online prior to clicking Reporter links. | │ |
|
View the PDF version of the Reporter. |
|
Quickscribe
Alerts
Are you looking for a more custom notification that will advise you about important developments that impact your specific area of interest? Quickscribe offers numerous customizable alerts – visit the
My Alerts Page. Quickscribe alerts are included with your subscription, so feel free to select the alert that works best for you!
|
Want to Track Federal Laws?For notification of federal amendments, we recommend using our Section Tracking tool to keep informed on changes to federal laws. Look for the paw icon adjacent to the sections you wish to track.Looking for Previous Reporters?We have archived the Quickscribe Reporter going back to 2004. Visit the historical Reporter archives page. |
The Cost of Inadvertent Settlement Offer Disclosure:
Technology Venture Corporation v The King
The Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure)
provide that a party may be entitled to substantial indemnity costs if
the party makes a settlement offer and ends up obtaining an outcome at
trial as favourable as or more favourable than that offer. In Technology Venture Corporation v The King (2025 TCC 157),
the appellant was denied substantial indemnity costs because the
settlement offer, in addition to being sent to the respondent, had
inadvertently been sent to the Court.
Costs and settlement offers
Rule 147 grants the Court broad discretion to make costs awards. This power is discretionary, but not arbitrary; it must be exercised on a principled basis. Costs are intended to be compensatory and not punitive. Factors that the Court may consider are listed in rule 147(3), and include the result of the proceeding, the amounts in issue, the volume of work, the complexity of the issues, and any matter relevant to the question of costs.
Read the full article by Alexander Barnes with Thorsteinssons LLP.
Fiduciary Duties After the Deal: Lessons
from Megory Holdings
Purchasers often rely on the continued
involvement of sellers to facilitate a seamless transition following a
business sale. But what happens when a seller, who remains with the
business, undermines the very value of the business they sold?
The Supreme Court of British Columbia's decision in Megory Holdings Inc. v. ABZ Falling Inc., 2025 BCSC 2318, provides a cautionary example and guidance for enforcing post-closing fiduciary obligations. Read the full article by Emma Walsh, Maureen Gillis and Adam Goldenberg with McCarthy Tétrault LLP.
Employee Ownership Trusts (EOTs): What
Canadian Business Owners Need to Know
A strong business is built by its founders and by its people. When it's time to sell the business, both founders and
employees deserve a future that reflects their contributions. That's why staying informed about new tools and opportunities is essential in
today's business landscape.
How Canada's New ITC Provisions Work for Non-Taxable
Entities and Why It's Important
The
Canadian government's suite of refundable clean economy investment tax
credits (ITCs) represents a shift in how large-scale decarbonization
projects in Canada will be financed. Crucially, these provisions extend
the financial benefit of the credits to entities that are exempt from
income tax, unlocking capital for the national clean energy transition.
For the commercial real estate sector, particularly in the high-emissions environment of Canada's major urban centres, this change is not just welcome – it is important for accelerating the necessary decarbonization of office towers. Read the full article by Laura Gheorghiu, Mark Giavedoni and Thomas J. Timmins with Gowling WLG.
B.C. Accountant Agrees to U.S. Court Settlement over
Alleged Role in $150 Million Stock Frauds
A B.C. accountant has agreed to a court
settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission over his
alleged role in two pump-and-dump stock schemes that pocketed more than
US$150 million.
In a civil case in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the SEC alleged that from at least April 2010 to October 2019, George John Drazenovic, a licensed accountant in B.C., assisted penny stock fraud schemes by at least two distinct groups.
Without admitting or denying the allegations, Drazenovic signed a settlement agreement subject to the approval of the court, according to information released by the SEC. Read the Vancouver Sun article.
The Limits to Proxy Disqualification and Chair Deference in AGMs:
Skychain Offers Fresh Insight on Advance Notice Provisions
The Supreme Court of British Columbia recently released its decision in 1154557 B.C. Limited v. Skychain Technologies Inc.,
a case in which the court addressed the invalidation of shareholder
proxies in connection with a contested annual general meeting, and
provided guidance on interpreting advance notice provisions in company
articles or by-laws, the procedural fairness owed to shareholders, and
limits on the deference owed to the chair of a shareholder meeting.
Background
Skychain Technologies Inc. faced significant shareholder unrest following a period of financial losses, management turnover, and a shift in business strategy. Dissident shareholders of Skychain, including 1154557 B.C. Limited (the Petitioner), sought to replace Skychain's board by nominating an alternative slate of directors at Skychain's 2024 annual general meeting (the AGM). The Petitioner gave notice pursuant to the advance notice provisions in Skychain's articles of incorporation with details of its board candidates and issued a dissident proxy circular soliciting "yellow proxies" in support of its slate.Skychain's management, citing alleged deficiencies in the dissident group's advance nomination notice – specifically, an alleged failure to disclose arrangements with other shareholders and connections to a former Skychain CEO – declared invalid the yellow proxies, which represented a majority of the voting shares of Skychain. As a result, management's slate of directors was acclaimed.
Read the full article by Trevor Zeyl and Viktor Hohlacov with Norton Rose Fulbright.
Favourable Changes to the Voluntary Disclosures
Program for Non-Compliant Taxpayers
The Canada Revenue Agency (the "CRA")
administers the Voluntary Disclosures Program ("VDP") to grant penalty
and/or interest relief to taxpayers who voluntarily disclose errors or
omissions in their past tax filings and pay the taxes owing, provided
they meet the eligibility requirements of the program. These
requirements are set out in the CRA's Information Circular IC00-1R7 (for income tax) and GST/HST Memorandum 16-5-1 (for GST/HST and certain other taxes).
Effective October 1, 2025, the CRA changed the requirements of the VDP, making the program more favourable to taxpayers. The key changes to the program are outlined below. Read the full article by Elizabeth Egberts with Thorsteinssons LLP.
The Wait Is (Still Not) Over: British Columbia Introduces New Restricted
Licence Regime for Incidental Sales of Insurance for January 2027
The Government of British Columbia has published the Restricted Insurance Agent Licence Regulation,
introducing a new restricted licensing framework for businesses that
sell insurance incidentally to their primary goods or services. Certain
non-insurance businesses previously exempt from licensure must now apply
for a Restricted Insurance Agency (RIA) Licence to continue selling
eligible insurance products.to sell insurance products. The new regime
will take effect January 1, 2027.
This change represents a significant shift for many non insurance businesses that offer add-on insurance with their products. It aligns BC's requirements with comparable regimes in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and New Brunswick, and introduces new training, oversight and transparency standards for incidental insurance distribution. Read the full article by Rick Da Costa and Surajreet Singh with Borden Ladner Gervais LLP.
Updates to BC Sales Taxes
The following updates to sales taxes were recently posted:
Provincial sales tax (includes municipal and regional district tax)
For more information, visit the BC government website.
BC Securities – Policies & Instruments
The following policies and instruments were recently published on the BCSC website:
For more information, visit the BC Securities website.
| Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
| Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act | Dec. 3/25 | by 2025 Bill 38, c. 31, sections 8, 9 and 12 only (in force by Royal Assent), Business Practices and Consumer Protection Amendment Act (No. 2), 2025 |
| Financial Institutions Act | Dec. 18/25 | by by 2019 Bill 37, c. 39, section 60 (part) only (in force by Reg 247/2025), Financial Institutions Amendment Act, 2019 |
| Jan. 1/26 | by 2019 Bill 37, c. 39, section 19 only (in force by Reg 117/2025), Financial Institutions Amendment Act, 2019 | |
| Insurance Council Regulation (569/2004) | Dec. 18/25 | by Reg 247/2025 |
| National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations (226A/2009) | Jan. 1/26 | by Reg 249/2025 |
UNDRIP Moves From Principle To Practice in
BC law: Key Takeaways from Gitxaała
On December 5, 2025, the British Columbia Court of Appeal released its decision in Gitxaała v. British Columbia (Chief Gold Commissioner), 2025 BCCA 430.
This decision further moves the United Nations Declaration on the
Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) from principle to practice. It
specifically confirms that UNDRIP, through BC's Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act
(DRIPA), now actively shapes how all BC laws are to be read and
applied, and that courts can declare provincial regimes inconsistent
with UNDRIP.
Redefining UNDRIP's role in BC law
The dispute arose from an earlier version of BC's mineral tenure system, which at the time allowed automatic online registration of mineral claims without prior consultation. The BC Supreme Court found this breached the Crown's duty to consult under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, and suspended its declaration to give the province time to redesign the regime.The chambers judge treated UNDRIP as non-binding, stating DRIPA section 3 was not justiciable, and declining to adjudicate the question of inconsistency with UNDRIP.
Read the full article by Maya Stano, Paul Seaman and Elana Yamanouchi with Gowling WLG.
BC to Amend DRIPA Legislation in
Response to Court Ruling
A recent Appeals Court ruling in British Columbia has declared that aspects of the province's Mineral Tenure Act are inconsistent with Indigenous rights, particularly as enshrined in the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act
(DRIPA). This landmark decision highlights a significant legal and
practical challenge to how resource extraction has historically been
managed in BC. In response, Premier David Eby has committed to amending
DRIPA. This development marks a pivotal moment for Indigenous
reconciliation and the future of resource development in British
Columbia.
Regulatory Package Continues Work
of Energy Statutes Amendment Act
On Oct. 20, 2025, government tabled the energy statutes amendment act (Bill 31), a series of regulatory and legislative measures introduced to streamline the approvals and permitting process.
Bill 31 received royal assent on Nov. 27, 2025, and the regulatory measures and ministerial order came into effect on Monday, Dec. 8, 2025.
Regulatory changes will address existing BC Hydro tariffs, making it easier for large industrial projects to connect to the North Coast Transmission Line (NCTL), and to support a final investment decision. Read the government news release.
BCSC Panel Finds B.C.-Based Mining Company
Filed Misleading Technical Report
A panel of the B.C. Securities Commission (BCSC) has found that a B.C.-based public mining company and its CEO made false or misleading statements in a report it filed.
Shaun Methven Dykes, a B.C. resident, is the president, CEO and a director of Multi-Metal Development Ltd., previously known as American CuMo Mining Corporation. At the time of the misconduct, the company's principal asset was a molybdenum-copper deposit in Idaho.
In 2019, Multi-Metal filed a technical report that contained an electronic signature of a qualified person – a professional engineer – and listed him as an author. A qualified person must meet specific requirements for education, training and experience, and must consent to the filing of the technical report by a publicly-traded company. The expert's certification is intended to ensure the reliability of the scientific and technical information in the report. Read the BCSC news release.
The Supreme Court's Lundin Mining Decision Redefines
the Meaning of Material Change for Public Companies
The Supreme Court of Canada's (the "SCC") decision in Lundin Mining Corp. v. Markowich
("Lundin Mining") marks a turning point for Canadian securities law by
revisiting the meaning of "material change", resulting in significant
implications for reporting issuers and the broader Canadian capital
markets.
For reporting issuers, the message is clear: timely disclosure obligations are broader than many issuers may have assumed. Issuers must move faster and disclose more. Operational events that were once viewed as routine, particularly in industries like mining, may now constitute a "material change," requiring immediate public disclosure even when they are temporary or inherent to the industry.
Issuers should now adopt a proactive disclosure posture. The safest strategy is to err on the side of timely transparency. Delaying disclosure until scheduled quarterly updates or relying on internal assessments that downplay operational incidents are no longer defensible. Read the full article by Geoff Clarke, Andrew Powers and Madison Derraugh with Miller Thomson.
B.C. Firm Penalized $142k for 'Major'
Waste Leaks at Gold Mine
A B.C. firm has been penalized more than
$142,000 for failing to maintain a shuttered gold mine that was found to
have leaked waste into the environment at levels dozens of times over
provincial limits.
Located about 25 kilometres outside of Stewart, B.C., Ascot Resources Ltd. purchased the Premier Gold Mine in 2018 with the goal of restarting operations. The mine was initially opened during the First World War and operated for more than seven decades before going into care and maintenance in 1996. Read the BIV article.
BC Energy Regulator Announcements
The following BC Energy Regulator announcements were posted recently:
Visit the BC-ER website for more information.
| Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
| Direction to the British Columbia Utilities Commission Respecting the North Coast Transmission Line Project (227/2025) | NEW Dec. 8/25 |
see Reg 227/2025 |
| Environmental Protection and Management Regulation (200/2010) | Dec. 15/25 | by Reg 237/2025 |
| North Coast Transmission Line Project Exemption Regulation (228/2025) | NEW Dec. 8/25 |
see Reg 228/2025 |
| Renewable Energy Projects (Streamlined Permitting) Regulation (93/2025) | Dec. 15/25 | by Reg 237/2025 |
Corporate Financial Disclosure and Child Support:
Insights from Boucher v. Boucher and BC Law
The recent decision in Boucher v. Boucher,
2025 MBCA 39 ("Boucher") highlights an important issue in family law
concerning the disclosure of corporate financial records for child
support purposes. The Manitoba Court of Appeal's decision offers a
helpful comparison to how BC courts may approach similar disclosure
issues.
The Boucher Case: A Manitoba Perspective
Boucher concerns a review of the parties' child support obligations. Ms. Boucher sought an order requiring her husband, Mr. Boucher, to disclose corporate financial records from two companies in which he had an interest. In one company, he was a minority shareholder, and in the other, he served as a director and officer.
Read the full article by Lina Kim, Ty Bradford and Matt Ostrow with Clark Wilson LLP.
Bill C-16: Updates to Canada's Federal Child Sexual
Abuse and Exploitation Material Reporting Regime
The Government of Canada has introduced Bill C-16, the Protecting Victims Act,
to "protect victims and survivors of sexual violence, gender-based
violence, and intimate partner violence, and to keep our kids safe from
predators."
Bill C-16 proposes a broad range of criminal law reforms, including a suite of targeted amendments to An Act respecting the mandatory reporting of Internet child sexual abuse and exploitation material by persons who provide an Internet service (Mandatory Reporting Act) that clarify the Act's scope of application and update law enforcement notification obligations relating to child sexual abuse and exploitation material (CSAEM) for online services.
Notably, Bill C-16 reprises key elements of the Mandatory Reporting Act amendment package previously proposed under Bill C-63 (the Online Harms Act), signaling the federal government's intent to prioritize targeted CSAEM reforms over the development of a broader online harms regime.
The bill was introduced and received first reading in the House of Commons on December 9, 2025, and was ordered for second reading at the next sitting of the House. Read the full article by John Salloum and Maryna Polataiko with Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP.
Protecting Parents from Extra Daily Child Care Fees
Guideline updates set minimum 9.5 hours of care before extended-hour fees apply
The
Province is protecting parents from extra child care fees by requiring
providers to offer at least 9.5 hours of care per day before charging
for extended hours.
Effective April 1, 2026, this policy update makes it clear for families and operators what is included in a base fee and sets a minimum threshold before additional extended-hour fees can apply. Providers will continue to set their hours based on what works for their program, staff and families. Read the government news release.
B.C. Announces New Measures to Combat
Intimate Partner Violence
British Columbia's attorney general has
announced further provincial measures aimed at combating intimate
partner violence, while calling newly tabled federal legislation "a step
toward justice."
Nikki Sharma said Tuesday [Dec. 9] the province will be establishing a comprehensive provincial framework to provide guidance to all those within the justice system to help better respond to intimate partner violence.
B.C. will also be creating an "internal government accountability mechanism to monitor the implementation" of reforms. Read the Canadian Press article.
Sneaky Trusts: The Legal Plot Twist with
Gratuitous Property Transfers
It is increasingly common for families to make
financial decisions aimed at minimizing probate fees and income tax.
However, these arrangements can have unexpected legal consequences. In
this blog, we explore one such outcome: the presumption of resulting
trust.
Presumption of Resulting Trust
The presumption of resulting trust applies to gratuitous transfers of property. It presumes that the transfer is not a gift to the recipient but is rather held in trust for the transferor. Two key elements give rise to a presumption of resulting trust:
- there is a gratuitous transfer of property, either as a gift or through the purchase of property in someone else's name; and
- there is no clear written or oral reason for why the transfer or purchase was made.
Read the full article by Emma Ferguson, Sabrina Ouyang and Valeriia Laut with Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP.
| Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
| Child, Family and Community Service Act | Dec. 3/25 | by 2025 Bill 29, c. 30, sections 1 to 5 only (in force by Royal Assent), Child, Family and Community Service Amendment Act, 2025 |
BC Announces Support for Western Forest
Products and Island Timber Frame
Through the Look West economic strategy, two
Vancouver Island wood-product manufacturers will soon be able to produce
more, higher-value products, including mass-timber products and inputs,
with new funding that will help protect and create sustainable jobs,
and reinforce British Columbia's supply chains.
Western Forest Products' value-added division in Chemainus, through the Province's BC Manufacturing Jobs Fund (BCMJF), is receiving as much as $7.5 million to add two new continuous dry kilns to its manufacturing operations. By improving drying precision, these kilns allow Western to expand high-value applications for second-growth western hemlock, including in future mass-timber inputs. This support increases the stability of its operation and harvesting operations on Vancouver Island. Read the full article published by Canadian Forest Industries (paywall).
Recent Legislative Developments Relating to Greenwashing
and Environmental Claims in Canada
As we approach the end of 2025, there are some
legislative developments of note in the greenwashing space.
Federal Bill C-15
On November 18, 2025, the federal government introduced Bill C-15 as part of its efforts to advance its "Climate Competitiveness Strategy" outlined in the 2025 Federal Budget. Bill C-15 amends the "anti-greenwashing" provisions originally set out in Bill C-59, enacted in June 2024.In an effort to clarify the Competition Act's greenwashing rules, Bill C-15 eases some of the standards imposed by Bill C-59, particularly around substantiation requirements for business-related environmental claims and private enforcement in respect of those matters.
Read the full article by Bill Gilliland and Nada Farag with Dentons.
Professional Forestry Leadership
Forest Professionals British Columbia has
formalized a previously undefined area of professional practice:
Professional Forestry Leadership. Since the inception of the Foresters Act, and now under the Professional Governance Act,
the practice of forestry has shifted and grown. Whereas our profession
was once based almost exclusively in the field, it now spans many
different variations and applications of foundational forestry
knowledge. The Professional Forestry Leadership area of practice carries
a particular weight: it demands a high level of responsibility with
regards to judgment, ethical awareness, accountability to the public. It
may be reflected in policy, in practice, or in academia, but it is a
unique set of skills and knowledge that represent a significant cohort
of our professional base. By naming it and giving structure to the
parameters of what it means for professional forestry, BC's regulatory
framework strengthens its reliance on forest professionals, and their
accountability and protection of the public interest – while providing
registrants with clear professional practice guidance.
A professional area of practice is one in which registered professionals may perform certain decisions, advice, or tasks. It is how we self-identify our areas of competence and provide the public with equal understanding. Read the full article by Tara Bergeson in the Winter 2026 issue of BC Forest Professional.
Government Actions Regulation Order
The following order was recently posted and signed under the authority of the Government Actions Regulation 582/2004 impacting Ungulate Winter Ranges:
Notice is hereby given that Ungulate Winter Ranges (UWRs) U-4-003 and U-4-004 in the Rocky Mountain Natural Resource District and Selkirk Natural Resource District are established for bighorn sheep in the Kootenay Boundary Region. The Order was signed on December 19, 2025 under the authority of sections 9(2) and 12(1) of the Government Actions Regulation (B.C. Reg. 281/2023) of the Forest and Range Practices Act and section 31 of the Environmental Protection and Management Regulation (B.C. Reg. 219/2024) of the Energy Resource Activities Act.
Details of the Order may be obtained from the Ecosystems Section, Kootenay Boundary Region, Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship, No. 401 - 333 Victoria Street, Nelson, BC V1L 4K3.
The Government Actions Regulation Order, accompanying maps, and spatial files may also be obtained from: https://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wld/frpa/uwr/approved_uwr.html [de24]
The Consequences of Canada's Climate Backslide
With Canada in the throes of an about-face on
climate policies, advocates say the shift could jeopardize the viability
of Canada's climate agenda.
The federal government's recent memorandum of understanding with Alberta included a deal to build a new crude oil pipeline, suspend clean electricity regulations in the province, and scrap the cap on oil and gas emissions.
This comes after a slew of policies that reverse Canada's previous climate commitments, including the consumer carbon price, anti-greenwashing legislation, and measures aimed at supporting household electrification, such as the Canada Greener Homes Loan Program. Read the full article by Moira Donovan in the CBA National.
Federal Plastics Registry: Key Updates for 2026
Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) has
announced a delay to Phases 2 and 3 of reporting under the Federal
Plastics Registry (Registry), giving businesses more time to prepare and
improve data quality. Phase 1 remains in effect, and late reporting is
still accepted, though enforcement actions are being considered. The
amended Section 46 notice reflecting these changes will be published in
the Canada Gazette in 2026. Businesses should use this time to
strengthen internal reporting systems, engage suppliers, and monitor
regulatory updates. Read the full article by Ingrid Anton and Victoria Asikis with Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP.
Drift Logs Destroying Intertidal
Ecosystems in B.C., Study Finds
A new study by biologists at the University of
Victoria has revealed why the simple back-and-forth motion of drift logs
on B.C. beaches has destroyed critical ecosystems that keep the ocean
healthy.
Visitors to most beaches on the West Coast will quickly notice the free-floating drift logs that have washed up onto shore.
When the tides go out the logs go with them, and when they come in the logs crash onto rocks and beaches. Read the CBC article.
Environmental Appeal Board Decisions
The following Environmental Appeal Board decisions were made recently:
Visit the Environmental Appeal Board website for more information.
| Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
| Drainage, Ditch and Dike Act | Dec. 3/25 | by 2025 Bill 22, c. 32, section 20 only (in force by Royal Assent), Statutes Act |
| Forest and Range Practices Act | Jan. 1/26 | by 2019 Bill 21, c. 25, section 5 only (in force by Reg 163/2023), Forest and Range Practices Amendment Act, 2019 |
| Forest Planning and Practices Regulation (14/2004) | Jan. 1/26 | by Reg 163/2023 |
| Low Carbon Fuels (Technical) Regulation (295/2023) | Jan. 1/26 | by Reg 24/2025 |
| Reviewable Projects Regulation (243/2019) | Dec. 15/25 | by Reg 237/2025 |
Detainees Under BC's Mental Health Act Now Entitled
to Meet Independent Rights Adviser
The British Columbia government has announced
that individuals undergoing a mental health crisis have a legal right to
communicate with an independent rights adviser, now that amendments to
BC's Mental Health Act, 1996, have entered into force.
The Mental Health Act permits the relevant authorities to involuntarily detain, admit, and treat or care for those with severe mental health disorders at designated mental health facilities to prevent their substantial mental or physical deterioration, protect them from themselves, or protect others. Read the full article by Bernise Carolino in the Canadian Lawyer.
New Safe Supply Rules Take Effect
in B.C., with Mixed Reactions
New restrictions to British Columbia's safe supply program are now in effect.
Some addictions specialists worry the changes will push people back to toxic street drugs, while others say the changes were long overdue.
"A majority of our clients haven't had an issue with the changes," said Jake Flood, operations manager at the Umbrella Society, a Victoria-based non-profit that connects people to treatment and recovery services.
Those changes – to further restrict access to the province's prescription opioid program or safe supply – rolled out Dec. 30. Now, most patients who take prescription opioids such as hydromorphone or fentanyl patches will have to do so under the supervision of a pharmacist or health professional. Read the CBC article.
Province Provides Second Report on Community-Based
Primary Care Services
As part of the Cooperation and Responsible
Government Accord 2025 (CARGA), the Province and BC Green Caucus are
releasing the second of two reports highlighting shared findings and
recommendations to strengthen primary care throughout British Columbia.
The second report highlights feedback shared by partners during engagement sessions led by the Ministry of Health and the British Columbia Association of Community Health Centres. The report details challenges that affect the expansion and effectiveness of primary care in B.C., particularly community health centres (CHCs). Read the government news release.
'Lost Economic Output': Medical Wait Times in
Canada Still at 28.6 Weeks in 2025
Canadian patients are still facing months‑long
delays for medically necessary care, with direct implications for
employers and HR leaders managing absence, disability and benefit costs,
according to a new Fraser Institute study.
The median wait between referral from a general practitioner (GP) and receipt of treatment is 28.6 weeks, down from 30.0 weeks in 2024.
However, the 2025 data are still "208 per cent longer than the 9.3 week wait Canadian patients could expect in 1993." Read the full article by Jim Wilson in the Canadian HRReporter.
BC Court of Appeal Dismisses Proposed Privacy Class Action; Finds Use of
Professionals' Names Was Not Commercial Exploitation
In RateMDs Inc. v. Bleuler, 2025 BCCA 329,
the BC Court of Appeal overturned certification of a proposed privacy
class action, finding that the plaintiff's novel claims that use of
health professionals' names violated their privacy and amounted to
commercial exploitation under provincial privacy statutes were bound to
fail. This decision reaffirms the BC courts' commitment to screening out
novel claims that are bound to fail at certification. There is no
justification for engaging significant court and party resources to
litigate claims that have no prospect of success simply because they are
novel.
The plaintiff in RateMDs alleged that the defendant's use of health professionals' names and contact information to create profiles about them on its website, under which patients could post reviews, was a violation of the health professionals' privacy and an unauthorized use of their names for commercial purposes, giving rise to claims under ss. 1 and 3(2) of the BC Privacy Act and comparable privacy legislation in other provinces. Read the full article by Katherine Booth and Nina Butz with Bennett Jones LLP.
Supreme Court Restores Woman's Conviction for
Mother's Attempted Murder with Insulin
The decision sidesteps an attempt to put a bright line between murder and assisted suicide
The Supreme Court of Canada has restored an
attempted murder conviction in a case involving an apparent attempted
murder-suicide with a Toronto nurse, her mother and daughter.
The 6-3 decision sidestepped an attempt to put a bright line between murder and assisted suicide. It included a partial dissent centred on jury instructions and the air of reality of a theory that the trial judge did not raise in those instructions.
In June of 2019, B.F., her mother I.F., and daughter E were all found unconscious with five emptied insulin pens nearby. B.F. and I.F. made full recoveries, but E suffered permanent brain damage and irreparable damage to other organs, and will require medical care for the rest of her life. Read the full article by Dale Smith in the CBA National.
| Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
| Drug Schedules Regulation (9/98) | Dec. 15/25 | by Reg 238/2025 |
| Mental Health Act | Dec. 3/25 | by 2022 Bill 23, c. 17, sections 1 to 8 only (in force by Reg 157/2025), Mental Health Act |
| by 2025 Bill 32, c. 28, sections 1 and 2 only (in force by Royal Assent), Mental Health Amendment Act (No. 2), 2025 | ||
| Mental Health Regulation (233/99) | Dec. 3/25 | by Reg 157/2025 |
| Dec. 15/25 | by Reg 234/2025 | |
| Vaping Product Damages and Health Care Costs Recovery Act | NEW Dec. 3/25 |
c. 29, SBC 2025, Bill 24, whole Act in force by Royal Assent |
Dec. 12: New Leaves Take Effect
As of today, Dec. 12, 2025, federally regulated
employees have new protections around pregnancy loss and the death of a
child, and employers face sharper compliance obligations and penalties
if they fail to deliver them.
Key amendments to Part III of the Canada Labour Code are now in effect, and the changes significantly expand leave entitlements while raising the stakes for non‑compliance through new administrative monetary penalties.
Also of note to employers: new record-keeping obligations are taking effect. Read the full article by Sarah Dobson in the Canadian HRReporter.
Wrongful Dismissal During Probation:
Key Lessons for Employers
In Liivam v. MacKay Contracting Ltd., 2025 BCSC 582,
the British Columbia Supreme Court (the "Supreme Court") held the
employer wrongfully dismissed an employee during the employee's
probationary period. The Supreme Court held that the employer did not
give the employee a reasonable opportunity to display his suitability
for the position and made its decision on the basis of allegations that
were not properly investigated.
In this case, the plaintiff was employed by the defendant, MacKay Contracting Ltd. (the "Defendant MacKay"), as a Site Supervisor on a construction site in Cuba. The Defendant MacKay contracted with the defendant, Sherritt International Corporation (the "Defendant Sherritt"), to provide on-site construction management, supervision and other services. The Defendant MacKay's contract with the Defendant Sherritt included a number of policies, including a "Deportment Policy". Their agreement also included a separate document titled "Special Terms and Conditions". Read the full article by Tiffany Lee with Pushor Mitchell LLP.
Minimum Rates Increase Dec. 31 for
Hand-Harvest Farm Workers
The minimum piece rates for hand harvesting of
specified farm crops will increase by 2.6% on Wednesday, Dec. 31, 2025.
The increase applies to 15 agricultural crops harvested by hand, as specified in the Employment Standards Regulation. The hand-harvested crops are peaches, apricots, brussels sprouts, daffodils, mushrooms, apples, beans, blueberries, cherries, grapes, pears, peas, prune plums, raspberries and strawberries.
This is an annual increase based on B.C.'s average annual inflation rate in 2024 and is consistent with the 2.6% increase to the general minimum hourly wage that came into effect June 1, 2025.
After legislative changes were made to the Employment Standards Act in spring 2025, increases to the general minimum wage for piece rates will come into effect each year on Dec. 31, based on the previous year's average inflation rate. Read the government news release for additional details.
Why Remote Workers Keep Winning in
Employment Law Disputes
Employers hoped remote work would vanish with
the pandemic. Employees quietly built their lives around it. Courts,
meanwhile, have started defining its legal boundaries – often in ways
employers never anticipated.
Across Canada, companies pushing sudden return-to-office mandates are colliding with employees who now view remote work as a contractual right – and in most cases it is.
Surveillance software has become the new battleground. Documentation – or the lack of it – is deciding dismissals. And judges are increasingly skeptical of employers who change major work terms without explanation.
This three-part package explains:
Read the article by Howard Levitt in the Financial Post.
While Pre-Planning Was Limited, Ombudsperson Investigation Finds
Speed of Provincial Government Delivery of Social Assistance
Cheques During 2024 Postal Strike Was Reasonable
The BC Ombudsperson released a report today
outlining the results of his office's investigation into the Ministry of
Social Development and Poverty Reduction's distribution of income and
disability assistance cheques during the 2024 Canada Post strike.
The report, Stamp of Approval: Delivering income and assistance cheques during a postal strike, finds that while imperfect, the ministry's response to the strike was satisfactory and assistance payments were delivered in a timely manner. Read the report from the Office of the Ombudsperson.
B.C. Maintains Status Quo on Public Sector
Workers Going Back to Office Full-Time
Monday [Jan. 5] was the first day in Ontario
that public sector workers must return to the office five days a week,
prompting questions in B.C. about remote work options for civil
servants.
"We're seeing a revitalization of rural communities where people can live and work for lower cost of living," Paul Finch, president of the BCGEU, told Global News.
The BC NDP government has not announced any plans to mandate civil servants back to work five days a week, but the Opposition says it's time. Read the Global News article.
| Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
| Employment and Assistance Regulation (263/2002) | Dec. 1/25 | by Reg 197/2025 |
| Employment and Assistance for Persons with Disabilities Regulation (265/2002) | Dec. 1/25 | by Reg 194/2025 and Reg 197/2025 |
| Public Service Labour Relations Act | Dec. 3/25 | by 2025 Bill 22, c. 32, section 27 only (in force by Royal Assent), Statutes Act |
No Repeals Planned for Housing-Related Legislation
A group of metro Vancouver mayors have asked the province to repeal various housing-related legislation, including:
The Housing Minister and Premier have said that the provincial government will not repeal the legislation. For more information, see the article in BIV.
Update on Bill M216 – PIBC Submission
The Planning Institute of British Columbia (PIBC) has submitted formal input on Bill M216 – Professional Reliance Act to the Select Standing Committee on Private Bills and Private Members' Bill. PIBC principally recommends:
THAT THE SELECT STANDING COMMITTEE ON PRIVATE BILLS AND PRIVATE MEMBERS' BILLS MOVE TO NOT PROCEED WITH BILL M216.
Separately, PIBC recommends that the Province, through the Ministry of Housing & Municipal Affairs collaborate with communities and key stakeholders, including PIBC, to accelerate implementation of integrated and effective development approvals process improvements for housing and to share best practices through expanded peer learning. In reviewing Bill M216, PIBC found five fundamental deficiencies: Read the PIBC news release.
Professional Reliance Act Proposal Ruffles Feathers
Bill M216, the Professional Reliance Act, has generated greater
interest than many members' bills, with its proposal on streamlining
development approval procedures eliciting strong comments for and
against. What some of those comments represent is a more fundamental
disagreement about the status of technical professionals and the meaning
of their work. For contractors, developers and registered
technical professionals, just as much as for local government councils
and planning departments, a members' bill recently introduced into the
BC Legislative Assembly is provoking not a little controversy and
interest. Read the full article published by Civic Legal LLP.
Proposed Water-infrastructure Fee Would Add to
Already High Building Costs: VIU Prof
The development cost charge is meant to pay for about 35 percent
of nearly $2 billion in infrastructure spending to address the effects
of climate change and population growth on the water supply.
Greater Victoria's regional water commission is proposing that developers pay for nearly all of the cost of new water infrastructure for future growth in the region. But critics say a development cost charge for water infrastructure proposed by the Capital Regional District for new developments would add thousands of dollars in costs to every home built, further hampering construction during a slowdown in the building industry. Mark Holland, a planning professor at Vancouver Island University who is also a consultant for developers, said new projects are already being stalled by rising interest rates, high construction costs and charges levied by municipalities on new buildings, not to mention supply-chain issues. Read the Times Colonist article (paywall).
Independent Review Recommends
911 Legislative Reform
An independent review of 911 emergency communications service
delivery in BC has concluded that the Province should "[implement] a
structured oversight framework and [take] more responsibility across the
sector." This comes approximately one year after Premier David Eby, in
response to a UBCM resolution and local government concerns, announced
an internal review of E-Comm and 911 service. The review (released
at the same time as an independent review focused specifically on
E-Comm's operations), examined BC's 911 emergency communications service
delivery model and the role of the provincial government. It focused on
three key components: governance, standards and funding. Several
service delivery options were evaluated based on their ability to ensure
system capacity, financial sustainability, consistency of service
levels and access to services, and to meet future expectations and
technological advancements. Read the UBCM article.
| Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
| Development Charge (Instalments) Regulation (166/84)(formerly Development Cost Charge and Amenity Cost Charge (Instalments) Regulation) | Jan. 1/26 | by Reg 99/2025, Reg 161/2025 and Reg 239/2025 |
| Development Cost Charge Regulation (114/2018) | Jan. 1/26 | by Reg 190/2025 and Reg 248/2025 |
| Electrical Power Corporations Valuation Regulation (217/86) | Dec. 17/25 | by Reg 240/2025 |
| Eligible Port Property Designation Regulation (309/2010) | Dec. 15/25 | by Reg 236/2025 |
| Interpretation Act | Dec. 3/25 | by 2025 Bill 22, c. 32, sections 23 and 25 only (in force by Royal Assent), Statutes Act |
| Islands Trust Act | Jan. 1/26 | by 2025 Bill 13, c. 7, section 12 only (in force by Royal Assent), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2025 |
| Liquor Control and Licensing Regulation (241/2016) | Dec. 8/25 | by Reg 226/2025 |
| Local Elections Campaign Financing Act | Jan. 1/26 | by 2025 Bill 13, c. 7, sections 13 to 19 only (in force by Royal Assent), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2025 |
| Local Elections Campaign Financing Regulation (281/2021) | Jan. 1/26 | by Reg 203/2025 |
| Managed Forest Land and Cut Timber Values Regulation (90/2000) | Dec. 17/25 | by Reg 241/2025 |
| Port Land Valuation Regulation (304/2010) | Dec. 15/25 | by Reg 231/2025 |
| Railway and Pipeline Corporations Valuation Regulation (203/86) | Dec. 17/25 | by Reg 242/2025 |
| Railway, Pipeline, Electric Power and Telecommunications Corporation Rights of Way Valuation Regulation (218/86) | Dec. 17/25 | by Reg 243/2025 |
| Restricted-Use Property Valuation Regulation (236/2017) | Dec. 15/25 | by Reg 232/2025 |
| School Act | Jan. 1/26 | by 2025 Bill 13, c. 7, section 72 only (in force by Royal Assent), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2025 |
| School Tax Exemptions (Solar Power Projects) Regulation (225/2025) | NEW Dec. 31/25 |
see Reg 225/2025 |
| Short-Term Rental Accommodations Act | Dec. 15/25 | by 2025 Bill 25, c. 26, sections 35, 38, 39, 41, 42, 44, 46 and 50 only (in force by Reg 233/2025), Housing and Municipal Affairs Statutes Amendment Act, 2025 |
| Jan. 1/26 | by 2025 Bill 25, c. 26, section 34 only (in force by Royal Assent), Housing and Municipal Affairs Statutes Amendment Act, 2025 | |
| Short-Term Rental Accommodations Regulation (268/2023) | Dec. 4/25 | by Reg 224/2025 |
| Dec. 15/25 | by Reg 233/2025 | |
| Telecommunications Corporations Valuation Regulation (226/86) | Dec. 17/25 | by Reg 244/2025 |
| Vancouver Charter | Jan. 1/26 | by 2025 Bill 13, c. 7, sections 48 to 60 only (in force by Royal Assent), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2025 |
UNDRIP Moves from Principle to Practice in
BC Law: Key Takeaways from Gitxaala
On December 5, 2025, the British Columbia Court of Appeal released its decision in Gitxaala v. British Columbia (Chief Gold Commissioner), 2025 BCCA 430. This decision further moves the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) from principle to practice. It specifically confirms that UNDRIP, through BC's Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA),
now actively shapes how all BC laws are to be read and applied, and
that courts can declare provincial regimes inconsistent with UNDRIP.
Redefining UNDRIP's Role in BC law
The dispute arose from an earlier version of BC's mineral tenure system, which at the time allowed automatic online registration of mineral claims without prior consultation. The BC Supreme Court found this breached the Crown's duty to consult under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, and suspended its declaration to give the province time to redesign the regime. The chambers judge treated UNDRIP as non-binding, stating DRIPA section 3 was not justiciable, and declining to adjudicate the question of inconsistency with UNDRIP.
Read the full article by Maya Stano, Paul Seaman and Alana Yamanouchi (Articling Student) with Gowling WLG.
Legal Experts Warn Proposed Immigration Bill
Marks Shift away from Rule of Law
As federal lawmakers prepare for a sweeping new immigration bill, the Canadian Immigration Lawyers Association is sounding the alarm over what it describes as a profound threat to parliamentary scrutiny, administrative law, and Canada's human-rights obligations. Pantea Jafari, founder and lead counsel at Jafari Law, and a member of CILA's Bill C-12 committee, which is studying the legislation, says the bill represents an unprecedented consolidation of executive power – one that could reshape immigration decision-making for years to come. Read the full article by Zena Olijnyk with Canadian Lawyer.
B.C. Court of Appeal Confirms 30-Day Timeline for
Appeals and Cross-Appeals of Arbitral Awards
In a recent decision, the British Columbia Court of Appeal provided important clarification regarding the deadlines for filing appeals of
arbitral awards under the Arbitration Act, SBC 2020, c 2. The Court
determined that the timeline in the Court of Appeal Rules, BC Reg
120/2022, which allows cross-appeals within 15 days of the filing of the initial appeal, does not apply to an appeal under the Arbitration Act.
Both appeals and cross-appeals of arbitral awards must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of an arbitral award.
Read the full article by Laura Cundari, FCIArb, Lindsay Rowell, FCIArb, Stefani Connelly (née Wesley), Andrew Kavanagh and Nicholas Chase with Blakes.Facts and Decision
Sinclair v. T.D.M.C. Holdings Ltd. (Sinclair) concerned an arbitral award delivered on May 28, 2025. The appellants filed a notice of appeal and application for leave to appeal the award just before the 30-day limit for doing so under section 60 of the Arbitration Act expired on June 27, 2025.
Digital Dispute Resolution and Adjudication: What's Next?
Introduction:
Dispute resolution has undergone a transformation in the last decade, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic (COVID) and the adoption of digital technologies. The rise of Zoom and other virtual platforms has not only altered the technical requirements of mediation but has also reshaped its substance, accessibility, and human dynamics. Looking ahead, artificial intelligence (AI) is likely to further redefine how disputes are managed, resolved, and even predicted.The Shift to Virtual Mediation
Before 2020, mediation was usually a face-to-face process, valued for its personal connection. The onset of COVID forced everyone to pivot almost overnight to virtual platforms such as Zoom and Microsoft Teams. What began as an emergency measure has since evolved into the norm of modern dispute resolution.
Read the full article by Stephen McPhee, KC, published in BarTalk.
BC Court of Appeal Dismisses Proposed Privacy Class Action;
Finds Use of Professionals' Names Was Not Commercial Exploitation
In RateMDs Inc. v. Bleuler, 2025 BCCA 329,
the BC Court of Appeal overturned certification of a proposed privacy
class action, finding that the plaintiff's novel claims that use of
health professionals' names violated their privacy and amounted to
commercial exploitation under provincial privacy statutes were bound to
fail. This decision reaffirms the BC courts' commitment to screening out
novel claims that are bound to fail at certification. There is no
justification for engaging significant court and party resources to
litigate claims that have no prospect of success simply because they are
novel. The plaintiff in RateMDs alleged that the
defendant's use of health professionals' names and contact information
to create profiles about them on its website, under which patients could
post reviews, was a violation of the health professionals' privacy and
an unauthorized use of their names for commercial purposes, giving rise
to claims under ss. 1 and 3(2) of the BC Privacy Act and
comparable privacy legislation in other provinces. Read the full article
by Katherine Booth and Nina Butz with Bennett Jones LLP.
What Tribunal Adjudicators Wish You Knew
During law school and throughout my career as a lawyer, I have focused my practice on administrative law. While
completing my degree, I interned with WorkSafeBC's Review Division,
which is the first level of appeal for workers and employers
dissatisfied with compensation claim decisions. There, I adjudicated
appeals of decisions involving claims acceptance and benefit duration.
That experience turned out to be invaluable later, when I began
representing unionized workers in their WorkSafeBC claim appeals before
the Review Division and WCAT. I already knew what kinds of submissions
helped an adjudicator—and which ones didn't. It saved me time, and it
made my advocacy more effective. For the past eleven years, I've
practiced labour law, both in private practice and with two of the
largest public-sector unions in BC. I now also serve as a part-time
member of the Employment Standards Tribunal ("EST"), which hears appeals
of determinations made under the Employment Standards Act. The EST allows appeals based on errors of law, procedural fairness, and new evidence. Read the full article by Diane Irvine, published on BarTalk .
Interpreting Legislation vs Making Legislation
Regulators cannot enact legislation through policy. However,
regulators frequently publish policies interpreting or applying their
legislation. The line between those two activities is sometimes fine. A
recent BC decision offers some reassurance to regulators: LGM Financial
Services Inc. v British Columbia Financial Services Authority, 2025 BCSC
2423. LGM sold "appearance protection service contracts" to automobile
purchasers for many years without objection. Following an investigation
into a related matter, the regulator issued a Statement indicating that
automobile insurance covers a loss "if the glass, paint, or other part
of a motor vehicle is otherwise damaged due to a fortuitous event." LGM
argued that the Statement materially altered the definition of
automobile insurance in the legislation and that the Statement indicated
that compliance was mandatory. Read the full article by Bernie LeBlanc with Steinecke Maciura LeBlanc.
Bill C-3 Restores Canadian Citizenship to Lost Canadians
On December 15, 2025, Bill C-3, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act
(2025), came into force. Bill C-3 amended the Canadian Citizenship Act
to no longer limit citizenship by descent to the first generation born
abroad. It also restored Canadian citizenship to former citizens who
failed to retain their Canadian citizenship under Section 8 of the
previous legislation and the descendants of persons who acquired
Canadian citizenship under prior amendments that came into force in 2009
and 2015.
Overview of prior citizenship legislation
The term "lost Canadians" refers to individuals who lost or never obtained citizenship because of earlier citizenship laws. Amendments to the Citizenship Act, which came into effect in 2009 and 2015, restored or gave citizenship to many of these lost Canadians. However, some individuals continued to be excluded.
Read the full article by Henry Chang with Dentons.
SCC: Accused Can Challenge Warrantless Arrest If It
Does Not Comply with Criminal Code Limits
An accused person can challenge the lawfulness of a warrantless
arrest, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled Friday [Dec 12], if the arrest
does not comply with the limits set out in the Criminal Code. Writing for a unanimous court in the case of R v. Carignan, Justice
Suzanne Côté found that the text, context and purpose of s. 495(2) of
the Criminal Code show that the limits imposed on the power of arrest
without warrant are mandatory in nature. Canada's highest court,
therefore, dismissed the prosecution's appeal and upheld a Quebec Court
of Appeal order for a new trial. Read the full article by Zena Olijnyk with Canadian Lawyer.
| Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
| Evidence Act | Dec. 3/25 | by 2025 Bill 22, c. 32, section 21 only (in force by Royal Assent), Statutes Act |
| King's Printer Act (formerly Queen's Printer Act) | Dec. 3/25 | by 2025 Bill 22, c. 32, sections 28 to 30 only (in force by Royal Assent), Statutes Act |
Public Notice – 60-Day Consultation for New Editions of
CSA B620, CSA B621 and CSA B622
The Canadian Standards Association (CSA) has released the drafts of
the update to safety standards CSA B620, CSA B621 and CSA B622 for a
60-day consultation period. The consultation is open from November 28,
2025, to January 27, 2026. Once the safety standards have been finalized
and published, a notice will be issued specifying the coming into force
date of the updated standards.
Scope of the consultation
Safety standard CSA B620 sets out the requirements for the design, manufacture, assembly, modification, inspection, testing and repair of highway and TC portable tanks. The standard also prescribes registration requirements by Transport Canada (TC) of facilities, training organizations, design engineers and design review agencies for conducting the activities within the scope of the standard. Safety standard CSA B621 sets out the selection and use requirements for highway and TC portable tanks transporting dangerous goods of Class 3, 4, 5, 6.1, 8, and 9. Safety standard CSA B622 sets out the selection and use requirements for highway and TC portable tanks transporting dangerous goods of Class 2.
Read the full notice published by Transport Canada.
BC Transit Files $5 Million Lawsuit Claiming
It Received 206 Leaky Buses
Claim filed in B.C. Supreme Court alleges Vicinity Motor (Bus) Corp.,
now bankrupt, delivered defective buses and failed to repair them or
compensate the bus company
BC Transit has filed a lawsuit against a bus manufacturer, saying it faces a $5.2 million repair bill to fix 206 leaky buses. The publicly owned transit company that runs buses across much of BC alleges the Vicinity Motor (Bus) Corp. breached its contract to properly design or manufacture the low-floor buses to withstand B.C.'s rainy season, according to the lawsuit filed in B.C. Supreme Court on Dec. 23. A water test was to be applied to each bus to simulate western BC rain conditions and the daily vehicle wash cycle, according to the claim. Read the full article published by the Vancouver Sun.
Preparing for Winter Roadside Emergencies
For workers who drive on the job, getting stuck, stranded, or delayed
can be challenging at the best of times. But in winter, these roadside
emergencies can be life-threatening, especially for workers who drive
alone or in remote areas. The causes can range from poor road conditions and crashes to
mechanical failures and avalanche clearing. Whatever the cause, these
emergencies can expose workers to passing vehicles, extreme cold, carbon
monoxide, wildlife, and other hazards. "Roadside emergencies definitely happen," says Trace Acres, program
director for Road Safety at Work. "And a lot of highway maintenance
contractors will tell you they see people stranded who are simply not
prepared for the conditions." Read the full article by Michael Laycock, published in WorkSafe Magazine – Winter 2025.
For more information on these and other items, visit the CVSE website.
Passenger Transportation Board Bulletins
The following updates were recently published by the BC Passenger Transportation Board:
News and Updates
Applications Received
Application Decisions
Visit the Passenger Transportation Board website for more information.
| Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
| Motor Vehicle Act Regulations (26/58) | Dec. 15/25 | by Reg 235/2025 |
WorkSafeBC Board of Directors Approves Amendments
to the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation and
the Prevention Manual
– from WorkSafeBC
At its November 2025 meeting, WorkSafeBC's Board of Directors
approved amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation and
the Prevention Manual. The amendments relate to Combustible Dusts and Standards Updates. Strikethrough versions of the amendments with explanatory notes can be accessed below. Deletions in the regulatory amendments are identified with a strikethrough and additions are in bold text and highlighted in yellow.
Drones, Done Safely: Practical Ways RPAS
Reduce Risk in BC Forestry
Forestry is full of places where people would rather not traverse:
steep, broken slopes; active cable corridors; fire-damaged blocks where
snags and ash pits wait underfoot. Small uncrewed aircraft, also known
as drones or RPAS, are already shifting who needs to be there and for
how long. When they're integrated with solid procedures and flown in
compliance with Transport Canada's aviation rules, drones are proving to
be a simple, practical way to cut exposure and improve decision-making
on forestry blocks. The clearest safety win is during line work and layout on steep
ground. Instead of sending a crew across gullies and bluffs to pull
light messenger line, a drone can lift and place a quarter-inch rope
along a planned corridor in minutes. That reduces the time people spend
traversing hazardous terrain and keeps them out of the fall line. The
drone doesn't replace a qualified crew though; it minimizes where the
riskiest minutes happen. Operators stage from stable ground with clear
egress, while the aircraft effortlessly does the scrambling. Read the full article by Taylor Alexander, published in the December issue of Forest Safety Newsletter.
WorkSafeBC BOD Decision: Duration of
Benefits (Retirement Age)
– from WorkSafeBC
On November 14, 2025, WorkSafeBC's Board of Directors revised
policies in the Rehabilitation Services & Claims Manual, Volume II
concerning retirement date determinations under section 201 of the
Workers Compensation Act. The policy revisions add a reference to the
general evidence policies and reword the guidance for workers who are 63
years of age and older on the date of injury to more closely match the
policy for workers under 63. The revised policies apply to all decisions, including appellate decisions, made on or after February 1, 2026.
WorkSafeBC BOD Decision: Commutations
– from WorkSafeBC
On November 14, 2025, the Board of Directors revised policy on
commutations in the Rehabilitation Services & Claims Manual, Volume
II. The primary change is to increase the monetary threshold for when
periodic payments for permanent disability benefits can be automatically
commuted to a lump sum payment from $200 to $350. The revised policy applies to all decisions made on or after February 1, 2026.
Supporting Workers for Successful Returns
Returning to work after a workplace injury is a collaborative process
that supports worker recovery while maintaining productivity and
morale. A successful return involves early communication, empathy,
planning, and cooperation among employers and workers. When a worker is injured, the focus naturally shifts to recovery. But
for many employers, what happens next can feel uncertain and a little
daunting. The good news is that the return-to-work experience can be a positive
one for workers and employers. With the right approach, it becomes a
practical, supportive, and repeatable process that helps injured workers
recover and stay connected, while also maintaining productivity and
morale. Read the full article by Marnie Douglas, published in WorkSafe Magazine – Winter 2025.
Extreme Cold Events and Planning for Worker Safety
Winter officially begins December 21st, and with it brings plunging
temperatures, snow, ice and frosty winds that can increase risks for
workers. In addition to extremely cold temperatures, wet, cool
conditions also pose a significant risk of cold stress and hypothermia. Between 2013 and 2023, there were 167 accepted claims for short-term
or long-term disability benefits for injuries related to cold stress in
BC, including frostbite, hypothermia and abrasions. More work-related
motor vehicle crashes occur in November, December and January than in
any other three-month period. Read the full article published in the December issue of Forest Safety Newsletter.
WorkSafeBC BOD Decision: Mental Disorders
– from WorkSafeBC
On November 14, 2025, WorkSafeBC's Board of Directors revised
policies in the Rehabilitation Services & Claims Manual, Volume II
concerning mental disorder claims under section 135 of the Workers
Compensation Act. The policy revisions change the definition of
significant work-related stressor and provide guidance on the limits of
the labour relations exclusion. The revised policies apply to all decisions, including appellate decisions, made on or after March 2, 2026.
Guidelines – Workers Compensation Act
January 1, 2026
Editorial revisions were made to the following guideline to reflect CPI adjustments:
Policies – Workers Compensation Act
January 1, 2026
The following policies were updated to reflect CPI adjustments, effective January 1, 2026:
Visit the WorkSafeBC website to explore this and previous updates.
| Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
| There were no amendments this month. | ||
BC Supreme Court Restrains City of Kelowna
from TerminatingLease in the Midst of
Real-Estate-Development Dispute
350 Doyle Avenue Holdings Inc. v City of Kelowna, 2025 BCSC 2532,
concerned an application "for an interlocutory or, alternatively,
interim injunction preventing the defendant, the City of Kelowna . . .,
from terminating a 99-year lease for property located in downtown
Kelowna". The case involved three conjoined actions over a large-scale
real-estate development and the decision to grant an injunction largely
turned on the plaintiff's ability to demonstrate irreparable harm if its
request for a pre-trial injunction were refused. The underlying action concerned a mixed-use tower, which the
plaintiff proposed to build in downtown Kelowna. After granting the
plaintiff a development permit, the City of Kelowna changed course and
rescinded its permit. In short order, the "underlying action was
commenced in February of 2024, and is grounded in breach of contract;
that is, a breach of the 99-year lease, and misfeasance in public
office". Read the full article by Kevin Zakreski with BCLI.
BC Appeal Court Dismisses Appeal by Short-term
Rental Owners over Restrictions
Dozens of owners of short-term rentals in Victoria who lost a bid in
B.C. Supreme Court to be exempted from or compensated for provincial
restrictions on their businesses have also lost in a higher court. The B.C. Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal by the Westcoast
Association of Property Rights and individual owner Angela Mason, who
were seeking relief from the Short-Term Rental Accommodations Act, which
came into effect on May 1, 2024. The law, designed to protect affordable long-term rental stock,
generally prohibits short-term rentals outside of those within an
owner's principal residence. Read the full article published by the Vancouver Sun.
BC Lowers Homeowner Grant
Threshold to $2.075 Million
The province has announced its threshold for 2026 provincial homeowner grants. In a news release on Friday [Jan 2], the province said basic grant
amounts would remain unchanged, with the threshold for homeowner grants
set at $2.075 million, down from last year's threshold of $2.175 million
as most residential property values in B.C. are down slightly. Homeowners with properties assessed at $2.075 million or less in the
Capital Regional District, the Fraser Valley Regional District and in
Metro Vancouver are eligible for grants of $570, while homeowners
outside of those areas are eligible for grants of $770. Read the full article published by the Vancouver Sun.
The BC Flipping Tax: What Homeowners,
Investors, and Builders Need to Know
Since January 1, 2025, British Columbia's Flipping Tax has applied to
the disposition of taxable property, pursuant to the Residential
Property (Short-Term Holding) Profit Tax Act (the "Act"). Intended to be an anti-speculation measure, the legislation is far
broader than many homeowners, investors, and builders may expect. The
tax may apply even when a sale has nothing to do with "flipping." If you plan to buy, sell, transfer, gift, or reorganize ownership of
residential property in BC, the Flipping Tax should now be a part of
your planning. Read the full article by St.John McCloskey and Lina Kim with Clark Wilson.
Condo Smarts: Deductible Settlement
Must Be Paid Back to Owners
Dear Tony: In your recent column you described where a strata council may have to levy for a deductible cost as a common expense while they are trying to recover the cost from the owner. Our Richmond strata corporation had a similar situation where we had to cover a $250,000 deductible in November last year, resulting from an owner changing their own bathroom fixtures causing a major flood and damaging 9 units in the building. The owner did not purchase home owner insurance, and our strata council did not pursue a claim with the Tribunal or the courts to recover the amount. Their position was "that's the way it is and not everyone can afford insurance." They levied the owners for the $250,000. Since then, the unit has sold and fortunately, the $250,000 was collected on the sale. Should that amount be refunded back to the owners as it was only raised for the claim in the first place?
Read the Times Colonist article (paywall).
Opinion: BC's Long-awaited Prompt Payment
Reforms Land amid Industry Downturn
Construction contractors across Canada have perennially experienced
payment delays on projects, unfairly impacting their cash flow. The
reasons for the payment delays are many. However, in essence, if a payee
can get away with keeping money in its own pocket for longer, it is not
likely to forego that opportunity. For this reason, the industry has pushed for years for legislation
that requires prompt payment on construction projects. Ontario, Alberta
and Saskatchewan have all in recent years enacted prompt payment
legislation, and now British Columbia has introduced Bill 20, the
Construction Prompt Payment Act. Read the full article by Norm Streu (with Harper Grey) & Chris Hirst (AHBL), published by BIV.
BC Court Finds Fraud in Complex
Real Estate Investment Dispute
The estate of a deceased real estate investor succeeded in a recent
B.C. Supreme Court decision that involved large sums of money, financial
complexity and disputed oral agreements. Tong a.k.a. Tony Zhang was a Chinese real estate investor who moved
to Vancouver in 2018. Starting in 2015, and before his death from
leukemia in 2022, he invested millions of dollars in BC real estate
through Hang Yin, whom he and his family knew from China, said a Dec. 17
judgment by Justice Gordon Funt. Zhang's estate claimed Yin invited him into real estate investment
opportunities in Metro Vancouver, which Zhang agreed to fund in exchange
for ownership interests, entrusting Yin with millions over the next few
years. Read the full article published by BIV.
| Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
| Short-Term Rental Accommodations Act | Jan. 1/26 | by 2025 Bill 25, c. 26, section 34 only (in force by Royal Assent), Housing and Municipal Affairs Statutes Amendment Act, 2025 |
| Short-Term Rental Accommodations Regulation (268/2023) | Dec. 4/25 | by Reg 224/2025 |
| Speculation and Vacancy Tax Act | Jan. 1/26 | by 2025 Bill 5, c. 10, sections 36, 37 and 39 only (in force by Royal Assent), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2025 |
BC Supreme Court Denies Woman's Request for
DNA Test against Her Sister
In an estate case where the deceased's daughter sought an order
compelling her sister to undergo a DNA test, the British Columbia
Supreme Court held that an unsubstantiated family rumour repeated by the
applicant and/or her sons was not a sufficient basis for the order. In Morberg Estate (Re), 2025 BCSC 2265, the parties were the
applicant and her sister, Ms. Morberg. Their biological mother passed
away on Nov. 16, 2009. Last May 21, their 86-year-old father (as
identified in the parties' birth certificates) died without a will. Read the full article by Bernise Carolino with Canadian Lawyer.
Executor's Fees in British Columbia –
Should You Charge Them?
Executors in BC are entitled to a maximum compensation of 5% of the
gross aggregate value of the estate under the Trustee Act, for their
care, pains, trouble and time spent. Under a Will, there is typically a
clause that deals specifically with the compensation of the Executors.
Often, when the calculation of compensation is more complex, such as
with corporate executors, the compensation of executors may be dealt
with in a compensation agreement between the testator and the executor. For these separate agreements to be valid, thereby entitling the
executor to the fee under the agreement rather than the Trustee Act, the
agreement must be incorporated by reference into the Will. The
agreement should not be generally referred to in the Will, and it may be
appropriate to have the agreement attached to the Will in some cases.
As a result, the agreement must be in existence at the time of the
execution of a Will or codicil. Read the full article by Vanessa DeDominicis with Pushor Mitchell LLP.
The Power of Two: Dual Wills in BC
While a single will can be the most suitable estate planning tool for
many will-makers, estate planning has evolved beyond the simple "one-will-per-person" paradigm. Dual wills (sometimes called multiple
wills) can be a tool to reduce probate fees and preserve
confidentiality. A dual will arrangement involves a will-maker executing two separate wills, including:
Read the full article by Maggie Lee and Jennifer Eshleman with Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP.
Canadian Capital Gains Tax on
Inherited Property Calculator
Canada does not have an "inheritance tax" or "death tax," but that
does not mean an inheritance is free of tax consequences. Instead of
taxing the inheritance itself, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) applies
capital gains tax, the deemed disposition rule, and income tax. These
regulations can make it challenging to understand the tax impact on
inherited property and any possible exemptions, which is why tools like a
Canadian capital gains tax on inherited property calculator are so
valuable. Read the full article published by Onyx Law.
Dealing with a Sibling Stealing from Estate in 2026
The loss of a parent is emotionally exhausting, and managing their
estate can add significant stress. Discovering a sibling stealing from
estate assets can turn grief into shock, as the very family you trust
may be misappropriating funds for personal gain. If you suspect sibling
theft, it's crucial to act quickly by documenting the discrepancies,
seeking legal advice, and exploring available legal remedies to protect
your inheritance and hold the responsible party accountable. In this blog, we will explain how estate theft by a sibling happens,
the warning signs to watch for, and the legal options available to
protect your inheritance and hold them accountable. Read the full article published by Onyx Law.
| Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
| There were no amendments this month. | ||