Federal Court Rejects CRA's Vague and Inconsistent
Information Request against Shopify Inc.
In the recent decision of Canada (National Revenue) v. Shopify Inc., 2025 FC 969 ("Shopify"), the Federal Court refused to authorize the Canada Revenue Agency (the "CRA") to issue a so-called "unnamed person requirement" ("UPR") to Shopify Inc. (the "Shopify UPR"). A UPR is a type of requirement letter seeking information about an "ascertainable group of unnamed persons" separate from the recipient of the letter. By the Shopify UPR, the CRA sought to obtain a list of certain Shopify merchants and various categories of information associated with those merchants' accounts. Shopify opposed that request, and the Court ultimately found against the CRA. In refusing to authorize the Shopify UPR, the Court concluded that the CRA had not satisfied the statutory preconditions for its authorization and, even if it had, the Court would exercise its residual discretion to limit the Shopify UPR's scope. Read the full article published by Daniel Sze with Thorsteinssons LLP.

What Bill C-2 Means for Financial Institutions: Key Changes to
Canada's Anti-money Laundering Regime
On June 3, 2025, Bill C-2, also known as the Strong Borders Act, was tabled in Parliament, bringing with it sweeping changes to Canada's anti-money laundering ("AML") framework. These proposed amendments to the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (the "PCMLTFA") aim to strengthen Canada's efforts against money laundering and terrorist financing by introducing more stringent compliance requirements, significantly higher penalties, and enhanced regulatory oversight. For institutions in the financial sector, this means stricter obligations, including mandatory enrolment with the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada ("FINTRAC") and the risk of increased fines for non-compliance. This article delves into the key changes proposed by Bill C-2 and what financial institutions need to know to stay ahead of the evolving compliance landscape. Read the full article by Stefan Mirkovic and Erika Cabral with Miller Thomson.

Settlements: Tax Outcomes Every
Litigator Needs to Know
Damages, settlement payments and indemnity payments frequently arise as a result of disputes in the commercial context. The income tax treatment of such payments can significantly impact their financial consequences for both the payor and recipient. Depending on their characterization, such payments may be fully taxable, partially taxable, and in certain cases, non-taxable. This article highlights key tax implications and planning strategies relevant to the taxation of settlement and indemnity payments, and discusses the importance of considering the tax implications of such payments to optimize financial outcomes and minimize tax liability when the circumstances allow for it.

Not All Damages Or Settlement Payments
Are Equal (After Tax)
When determining the tax consequences of a settlement or damages payment, the payment should generally be characterized in the same manner as what it is intended to replace (e.g., business income, capital property, or salary). 

Read the full article by Dominic Bedard-Lapointe, Marie-Soleil Landry, Simon Douville, Daniel A. Downie, Colton Dennis and Emma Murrin with McCarthy Tétrault LLP.

The New British Columbia Commercial Liens Act
British Columbia has brought into effect the new Commercial Liens Act ("the Act"). It is designed to consolidate a number of outdated pieces of legislation and common law principles into a single statutory framework to provide a one-stop shop for service providers who rely on commercial liens. If you operated under or were affected by the Livestock Lien Act, Repairers Lien Act, Tugboat Worker Lien Act, Warehouse Lien Act, Woodworker Lien Act, all of these Acts have been repealed. The legislation also abolishes common law possessory liens. Liens under the Builders Lien Act and the Forestry Service Providers Protection Act are unaffected and will continue to be governed by these statutes. Read the full article by Heather L. Jones and Manisha Mann with Gowling WLG.

CSA Invites Comments on Process Refinements and an
Oversight Model for a Proposed Dispute Resolution
Service for Investor Complaints
The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) are asking for comments on a proposed framework to oversee an independent dispute resolution service with binding authority for resolving investor complaints. The authority is expected to be the Ombudsman for Banking Services and Investments (OBSI), which currently helps resolve disputes between clients and financial institutions arising from client complaints. The CSA proposes an oversight framework to accompany the plan to grant OBSI binding authority. This framework aims to balance preserving OBSI's independence and ensuring accountability. The CSA's primary aim is to establish a neutral, fair and effective dispute resolution process for resolving investment complaints while offering businesses clarity on dispute outcomes. The CSA proposal builds on amendments and a request for comment from the CSA in 2023 regarding changes to the complaint handling provisions in National Instrument 31-103: Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations (NI 31-103). They also explored potential structural elements of a regulatory framework for the creation of a dispute resolution service with binding decision-making authority. The current CSA proposal includes refinements to the 2023 proposed framework. The comment period closes on September 15, 2025. Read the full article by Will Osler, Ali Naushahi, Bosa Kosoric and Yuliya Bairamova with Bennett Jones LLP.

CSA Updates Venture Issuers and 
Director Elections
The "venture issuer" definition is being amended to address the evolving landscape of the Canadian stock exchanges, including the creation of the Canadian Securities Exchange (CSE) senior tier. Changes in corporate governance developments under the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA) are also being incorporated into Canadian securities laws.

Takeaways
Effective September 19, 2025:

• The CSE's new senior tier will be recognized as a non-venture tier, aligning its treatment with other non-venture exchanges.
• The name changes of Aequitas NEO Exchange Inc. to Cboe Canada Inc. and the PLUS markets to AQSE Growth Market will be reflected in the definition of "venture issuer".
• Amendments to NI 51-102 will be made to clarify the voting requirements applicable to uncontested director elections for reporting issuers incorporated under the CBCA or other corporate statutes with similar codified majority voting provisions. 

Read the full article by Laura Levine and Ben Keen with Borden Ladner Gervais LLP.  

BC Securities – Policies & Instruments
The following policies and instruments were recently published on the BCSC website:

• 51-366 – Regulatory Concerns with Certain Asset or Business Acquisitions
• 13-102 – Adoption of amendments to Multilateral Instrument 13-102 System Fees
• BC Notice 2025/03 – Solicitation of New Members for Fintech Advisory Forum
• 25-314 – Proposed approach to oversight and refinements to the proposed binding authority framework for an identified ombudservice
• 81-102 – Investment Funds
• 31-366 – OBSI Joint Regulators Committee Annual Report for 2024
• 81-930 – CSA Notice Regarding Coordinated Blanket Order 81-930 Exemptions from Certain Repurchase Transactions Requirements for Investment Funds
• 96-101 – Amendments to Multilateral Instrument 96-101 Derivatives: Trade Reporting
• 91-101 – Amendments to Multilateral Instrument 91-101 Derivatives: Product Determination
• 13-103 – Amendments to National Instrument 13-103 System for Electronic Data Analysis and Retrieval + (SEDAR+)

For more information, visit the BC Securities website.

Permitting Reform for Renewable Energy Projects
B.C. recently introduced and passed Bill 14 – the Renewable Energy Projects (Streamlined Permitting) Act.

The Bill itself is brief and can be adequately described for our purposes by quoting selectively from the Province's Press Release:

• The Province "is taking action to speed up permitting for renewable energy projects to meet growing demand for clean power"
• Bill 14 "will expand the authority of the BC Energy Regulator (BCER) to oversee renewable energy projects"
• The BCER's "initial focus will be on the North Coast Transmission Line (NCTL) project and the wind and solar projects in BC Hydro's 2024 Call for Power"
• Bill 14 will also "exempt the NCTL Project and the nine wind projects in the 2024 Call for Power from the environmental assessment processes and allow the Government to do the same for other wind power projects in the Province"
• Bill 14 will "enable the BCER to establish a new rigorous regulatory framework for renewable energy projects through consultation with First Nations, ensuring that environmental standards will be upheld."

Under Bill 14, a renewable energy project means a project powered by biomass, biogas, geothermal heat, hydro, solar, ocean, wind or other prescribed resource.

The focus of this piece is not on any further analysis of Bill 14 itself – other sources are available for that. Rather we are focused on what Bill 14 represents – part of a reaction in Canada, and in the English-speaking world more generally, to prior delay, inefficiency and unpredictability in the permitting process. Read the full article by Jonathan Drance and Rachel V. Hutton with Stikeman Elliott LLP.

Salmon, Tribal Sovereignty, and Energy Collide as
US Abandons Resilient Columbia Basin Agreement
In June, the Trump administration pulled the federal government out of the Resilient Columbia Basin Agreement – a deal struck in 2023 by the Biden administration between two states and four Indigenous nations aimed at restoring salmon populations and paving a way to remove four hydroelectric dams along the river system. The move is likely to revive decades-old lawsuits and further endanger already struggling salmon populations.

But hydroelectric producers in Washington and Oregon have hailed the administration's decision, citing an increased demand for energy driven primarily by data centers for AI and cryptocurrency operations. Read the Hydro Review article.

Structuring Energy and Indigenous Equity Projects –
Critical Legal and Tax Considerations
Ottawa is preparing for Canada's next generation of major projects, including in relation to energy and various types of related infrastructure. The federal government has moved quickly to overhaul the legal framework for these projects through the Building Canada Act, a key component to Bill C-5, which received Royal Assent on June 26, 2025. This legislation allows the federal government to designate certain developments as "national interest projects" enabling them to bypass conventional regulatory processes and significantly reduce approval timelines.

Bill C-5, however, has sparked concerns among Indigenous nations and commentators – both for the lack of consultation in its development and passage, and for the risk that it could undermine and erode Indigenous rights. Read the full article by Caroline Morin, Zach Romano, Brendan Sawatsky, Claude E. Jodoin and Joel Tallerico with Fasken.

A 'Penultimate' Milestone: BC Hydro's
Site C Is Almost Complete
BC Hydro's 1,100 megawatt (MW) Site C project has reached one of its last major milestones with the successful commissioning of its fifth generating unit.

Testing and commissioning of the sixth and final generating unit is now underway. The unit remains on track to come into operation by this fall, BC Hydro said. Site C, on the Peace River in northeastern British Columbia, is the largest and most expensive infrastructure project in the province's history, with an estimated construction cost of $16 billion. Read the Hydro Review article.

B.C. Premier David Eby Completes Transition From
LNG Doubter With Victory Tour of Kitimat Plant
When David Eby goes all in on something, he does not fool around. Witness the premier's presence in Kitimat this week to celebrate completion of the LNG Canada project.

"I am so excited about this project and what it means for Canada, what it means for B.C.," the former LNG skeptic declared from the public platform on Thursday [July 31st]. "To be standing here, the proud leader of a province, of a government, that supported the workers in delivering the largest private sector investment in Canadian history – I want to congratulate all the workers and the company on this momentous occasion."

The premier rattled off the reasons for his conversion on the road, to, er Kitimat – including Indigenous partnership and weaning Canada off exclusive dependence on the U.S. for natural gas exports. Read the Vaughn Palmer Vancouver Sun article (Paywall).

BC Energy Regulator Announcements
The following BC Energy Regulator announcements were posted recently:

• TU 2025-12 – New Application Type and Activity Types for Renewable Energy and Prescribed Transmission Lines in Application Management System (AMS)
• IU 2025-07 – Notice of BCER Systems Outage

Visit the BC-ER website for more information.

High-Conflict Divorce Drives Up
Legal Costs Unnecessarily
While high-conflict family law trials are not the norm, they continue to overwhelm the justice system in numbers that seem to be escalating. JP v. KS 2025 BCCA 112 is such a case.

The litigation began in September 2018 when the police were called by the parties' 6-year-old daughter, who together with her brother, witnessed their father violently assault their mother. JP was arrested and removed from the home, while KS was admitted to hospital, an event that resulted in civil, criminal, and family law proceedings. The Ministry of Family and Child Services was also involved with the family. Read the full article by Georgialee Lang on Lawdiva's Blog.

Supreme Court Clarifies Rules
Around Youth Sentencing
In a pair of decisions, the Supreme Court of Canada clarified the sentencing rules in serious youth criminal justice cases and made it harder to have them punished as adults.

The Youth Criminal Justice Act sets out a two-part analysis. First, sentencing judges must determine whether they are satisfied that the accused has the reduced moral blameworthiness of youth and doesn't possess the sophistication and rational judgment of an adult at the time of the crime. Once that has been established, they must be satisfied that a sentence is sufficient to hold the young person accountable and that the established statutory youth sentence is insufficient. Read the full article by Dale Smith in the CBA National.

B.C. Child Watchdog Urges More Progress 1 Year After
Report into 11-Year-Old Boy's Torture and Death
One year after a landmark report into the horrific death of an 11-year-old Indigenous boy in foster care called for a "complete overhaul" of B.C.'s child welfare system, the province's child watchdog says the NDP government has a long way to go in improving conditions for the most vulnerable.

"We can do so much better for children and families," said B.C.'s representative for children and youth, Jennifer Charlesworth.

Charlesworth says she's worried that as the province faces a $10.9 billion deficit, key social services that keep families out of poverty and children safe will be cut.

"What we worry, because we have seen it many times … is that what gets cut are social programs. What gets cut are the very things that help stabilize and support families through those difficult times," she said. "Poverty has a direct impact on child well-being."

Charlesworth was speaking one year after the report into the 2021 death of an 11-year-old boy, who was beaten and tortured by the foster parents who were meant to care for him. Read the CBC article.

How Long After Separation Can You Claim Assets?
When your marriage ends, the difficult and complicated process of untangling your lives begins. That includes dividing assets and debts. In BC, the general rule is that all family property and all family debt is divided equally when you separate, regardless of whose name the property or debt is in.

While BC spouses are entitled to an equal division of family property and debt, the right can be lost if deadlines for taking legal action are missed. Once the applicable time limit for property claims expires, the claim may be "statute barred" (i.e., lost forever). Read the full article from Onyx Law.

To Marry or Not?
Because family law in Canada is regulated at both the federal and provincial/territorial levels, some inconsistencies exist from one part of the country to another. For example, not all provinces and territories have made changes to their statutes to align them with the 2021 changes made to the federal Divorce Act provisions dealing with child-related issues, meaning families have access to different legal regimes depending on where they live.

This lack of consistency also plays out with respect to how common-law relationships are treated; in particular, with respect to property division and access to exclusive possession orders. Some provinces and territories include common-law partners in their definition of spouse for the purposes of property division and some do not. (Quebec's Civil Code does not recognize common-law partnerships.) Read the full article by Pamela Cross on Law360 Canada.

Province Advances Systemic Changes to Integrate
Social Services, Prevent Crises
On the one-year anniversary of the release of the representative for children and youth's (RCY) Don't Look Away report, the Province is providing an update on its co-ordinated cross-government work across several ministries to better integrate social services and move to a more prevention-based model of support for children and youth.

The report called for systemic transformation across government to better support vulnerable children and families in B.C. by detailing the devastating story of a child's abuse and death. In response, the Province made eight key commitments and launched a cross-government deputy-minister project board to ensure a co-ordinated response to improving child and youth well-being in B.C. As part of this work, government is collaborating with Indigenous people and all partners to develop a child and youth well-being action plan and outcomes framework. Read the government news release.

Appeal Right or Appeal Wrong? SCC Finds Only One Reasonable
Interpretation of Immigration Appeal Right
In Pepa v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 SCC 21, the Supreme Court of Canada held that the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada had unreasonably interpreted its jurisdiction under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27 (IRPA) when it held that an individual who entered Canada under a valid permanent resident visa could lose their right to appeal an exclusion order based on the timing of the decision. The Court's decision clarified several points in administrative law. First, the presumption of reasonableness review is not rebutted by concerns about the potential for multiple competing interpretations of a statutory provision. Second, citing a precedent in a decision is not enough – the precedent must be on point and relevant to the question before the decision-maker, and reliance on it must be justified in the reasons. Third, interpreting a procedural right in a manner that is absurd or arbitrary will not be reasonable in the absence of clear legislative intent. Fourth, a higher burden of justification may apply to decisions with significant consequences for vulnerable individuals. Finally, in terms of remedy, a narrow issue of statutory interpretation with limited interpretive options may lead a court to more readily conclude that there is only one reasonable interpretation. Read the full article by Nadia Effendi, Teagan Markin, Patrick J. Leger and Nikesh Mehta-Spooner with Borden Ladner Gervais LLP.

Feedback Invited: Civil and Family
Chambers Practice Review
The Court has struck a Civil and Family Chambers Practice Working Group to review the current practices and procedures for both regular (short) and long chambers, and to consider potential changes with a view to providing a more timely and efficient chambers process. The Court invites interested members of the bar, litigants, organizations, and the public to comment on the issues they see arising in chambers practice and provide suggestions for improvement. The full notice is available here.

Comments can be provided by email to ChambersFeedback@bccourts.ca until September 5, 2025. From the BC Supreme Court.

Next Stage Of Engagement Begins on
Heritage Conservation Act Changes
In partnership with the First Nations Leadership Council, the Province is moving forward to the next stage of consultation and engagement on modernizing the Heritage Conservation Act.

The act, which regulates the protection, management and conservation of cultural and heritage sites in B.C., was last substantively updated in 1996.

"The Heritage Conservation Act is how we protect important cultural and archeological sites in B.C., but the current system doesn't work well for people, and it doesn't fully reflect our shared values or commitments," said Ravi Parmar, Minister of Forests. "As we embark on this important engagement, I am committed to ensuring our collective work will lead to a system that will support faster permitting, better planning and more meaningful discussions with people, communities, industry and First Nations."

The project is a multi-year collaborative effort, mandated in 2021 and co-developed through the Joint Working Group on First Nations Heritage Conservation, a committee established by the Province and the First Nations Leadership Council (FNLC) in 2007, which includes members appointed by the FNLC and the Province. It has involved two phases of engagement to date with First Nations across B.C. and more than 300 organizations representing local governments, the heritage and archeology sector, real estate and construction, resource industries and other interested parties. Read the government news release.

Start With the End in Mind: Recovering
Your Clean-Up Costs
In BC, any 'person' can undertake the investigation and remediation of a contaminated site. Often that person is not the 'person responsible' for the contamination, but has an interest in the property. Remediation can be an expensive and lengthy process, but in the case of developing a site, for example, it is unavoidable. In short, if it's not clean, you can't build. And, you certainly can't move people into a building that may be unsafe. This can leave an innocent current owner with no choice but to spend the money to remediate its property. But what then?

The Environmental Management Act specifically accounts for this scenario by providing a statutory cause of action for any person to use to recover their costs against any responsible person, but to recover your costs they must have been 'reasonably incurred'. This reasonableness requirement should be kept in mind when beginning an investigation and remediation, so at the end of the day you can bring a solid case against any 'responsible persons'. Reasonableness, however, is not necessarily for you to decide. Read the full article by Richard E. Bereti and Adam R. Way with Harper Grey LLP.

The BC Cumulative Effects Framework: Forest
Biodiversity and Old Growth Forests
In the spring 2025 edition of BC Forest Professional magazine, an overview of the BC Cumulative Effects Framework (CEF) was provided that explained how cumulative effects are being assessed and managed across British Columbia. Forest professionals in BC are increasingly expected to integrate cumulative effects considerations into their work, ensuring that decisions are made to effectively manage identified values within their scope of practice. Key guidance and direction from the provincial government, such as forest stewardship plan guidance and amendments to the Forest and Range Practices Act, as well as legal direction such as the Yahey decision, all highlight the importance and responsibility to consider cumulative effects in overall resource stewardship. This article explores the CEF forest biodiversity and old growth forest values and where forest professionals can access the latest available CEF information to consider cumulative effects in their forest management decisions. Read the full article by Doug Lewis, Traci Van Spengen, Darcie Fodor and Melissa Lucchetta in the BC Forest Professional Summer 2025 issue.

Federal Court Confirms Amendment Process for
Projects Assessed Under CEAA 2012
Large-scale projects requiring environmental or impact assessments in Canada are not static: as projects commence and develop, their needs can shift, or plans change. A key question for project proponents is how those changes will impact existing environmental permits, and what the amendment process will look like. A recent Federal Court decision has provided important clarity, confirming that project amendments are to be assessed against the same standards applied in the original assessment.

In Citizens for My Sea to Sky v. Canada (Environment and Climate Change), 2025 FC 1119, the Federal Court confirmed that where a project originally received its Federal Decision Statement (FDS) under the now-repealed Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012, S.C. 2012, c. 19 (CEAA 2012), amendments to that project can be assessed against the narrower definition of "environmental effects" set out in s. 5 of CEAA 2012. Amendments do not need to be assessed in relation to the broader "effects within federal jurisdiction," defined in the current Impact Assessment Act, S.C. 2019, c. 28 (IAA). Read the full article by Rick Williams and Alysha Flipse with Borden Ladner Gervais LLP.

BC Forest Practices Board Releases
2024-25 Annual Report
The Forest Practices Board has released its 2024-25 annual report, highlighting nearly three decades of independent oversight and a continued commitment to sound forest and range practices throughout British Columbia.

This year's report reflects a sector in transition with growing pressures from climate change, wildfires and the need to modernize land management – all requiring strong oversight and innovative responses.

Key highlights from the 2024-25 annual report:

• Audits: The board completed five audits, identifying 11 significant non-compliances related to fire hazards, bridge maintenance and silviculture practices.
• Investigations: The board published five complaint-investigation reports, and received nine new complaints, many tied to forest planning in sensitive areas.
• Special projects: The board had three special projects underway at the end of the fiscal year, focusing on wildfire rehabilitation, species-at-risk habitat and adaptive management under landscape planning.
• Appeals: The board reviewed 21 determinations under the Forest and Range Practices Act and the Wildfire Act, and continued its participation in two appeals

Read the full news release from the Forest Practices Board.

Canadian Product Stewardship and
EPR: 2025 Summer Update
In the first half of 2025, we have seen the continuation of innovative product stewardship and extended producer responsibility ("EPR") programs across the country. These initiatives aim to divert waste from landfills and cover a broad range of product categories, including tires, batteries, electronic products, packaging and printed paper, beverage containers, and hazardous and special products.

This article is the latest update in Gowling WLG's ongoing bi-annual series providing an overview of current developments in Canadian product stewardship and EPR programs.

This review includes new and expanded programs and shifts from product stewardship to EPR models. Emerging initiatives, as well as program delays and changes, are also discussed, with a view to what companies can expect moving forward. Read the full article by Mark Youden, Emma Hobbs, Jessica E.M Boily, Wynona Klemt and Sasha Mines with Gowling WLG.

New Wildlife Management Area Protects
More of Great Bear Sea
The Province, in collaboration with partner First Nations, has protected 1,450 hectares of critical ecosystems in the Great Bear Sea.

"The Great Bear Sea is home to some of the richest ecosystems in the world, and together with First Nations, we're conserving these important areas that support biodiversity, community well-being and economic prosperity for coastal communities," said Randene Neill, Minister of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship. "In doing so, we continue our partnership with nature. I thank the Gitga'at First Nation and Gitxaała Nation for their efforts in making co-governance possible."

This newest wildlife management area (WMA) covers the north coast's Kishkosh and Kitkiata inlets, southeast of Prince Rupert. Read the government news release.

Introducing BC's Silvicultural Systems Handbook (2nd Edition):
A Provincial Guide for Silvicultural Planning to Meet
Diverse Forest, Stand, and Landscape Goals
Forest management and silvicultural practices in British Columbia are evolving quickly, driven by changing climates and climatic extremes; natural disturbances; cumulative effects of past forest management practices; a need to improve forest diversity and resilience; and a desire for landscape-level forest ecosystem management to sustain ecosystems, economies, and cultures. Recent government policy initiatives that address these issues include the Old Growth Strategic Review recommendations; the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, which acknowledges the rights, roles, and goals of First Nations; and the recent Forest and Range Practices Act (FRPA) improvement initiative to support the development of forest landscape plans.

In spring 2025, the Ministry of Forests released the British Columbia Silvicultural Systems Handbook (2nd edition) as Land Management Handbook 79 (LMH 79/the handbook). It is a forestry practice guide for the design and application of silvicultural systems in BC to meet diverse forest stand and landscape goals informed by First Nations values and those emerging from local forest landscape planning processes. In this way, LMH 79 can support and enhance professional silvicultural planning at both the stand and landscape levels. [You can find references to this handbook and other related resources on Quickscribe's EnviroFor Guidance page.] Read the full article by Shannon Pearce, Mike Jull and Ken Zielke published in BC Forest Professional magazine, Summer 2025.

Wildlife Habitat Areas
Notice is hereby given that Medzih (boreal caribou) Wildlife Habitat Areas, Medzih WHA 9-181, 9-182, 9-183, 9-184, 9-185 and 9-186 in the Fort Nelson Natural Resource District, is established for Boreal Caribou in the North Area Region. The Orders were signed on June 17, 2025 under the authority of sections 9(1), 9(2) and 10(1) of the Government Actions Regulation (B.C. Reg. 582/2004) for the Forest and Range Practices Act. Details of the Orders may be obtained from the Caribou Recovery Program, North Area Region, Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship, Terrestrial Species Recovery, PO Box 9546 STN Prov Govt Victoria, B.C. V8W 9C5.

The Government Action Regulation Order, accompanying map, and spatial files may also be obtained from https://www.env.gov.bc.ca/cgi-bin/apps/faw/wharesult.cgi?search=show_approved[jy10]

Public Consultation Notice: Intact
Forest Landscapes in Canada
Consultation Period: August 1 – September 30, 2025
The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) Canada is pleased to announce the launch of a public consultation on draft Indicators related to Intact Forest Landscapes (IFLs). These indicators form part of our ongoing work to strengthen forest stewardship and protect ecologically and culturally significant forest areas across Canada. Read the notice from the Forest Stewardship Council.

Environmental Appeal Board Decisions
The following Environmental Appeal Board decisions were made recently:

Environmental Management Act

• Kalia Resources Corp. and Joseph Kitzke v. Director, Environmental Management Act [Final Decision – Appeal Allowed In Part]
• Canadian Natural Resources Limited v. Director, Environmental Management Act [Consent Order – Stayed]
• GT Farms Ltd. v. Director, Environmental Management Act [Preliminary Decision on Application for Document Production – Denied]

Water Sustainability Act

• Just Fish-Inn Inc. and Kris Tasci v. Assistant Water Manager [Dismissal Order – Appeal Dismissed]

Wildlife Act

• Joseph Gibson v. Deputy Regional Manager, Recreational Fisheries and Wildlife Programs [Final Decision – Appeal Dismissed]

Visit the Environmental Appeal Board website for more information.

Health Professions and Occupations Act – 
In Force April 1, 2026
The bulk of the Health Professions and Occupations Act (HPOA), 2022 Bill 36, c. 43, will be coming into force on April 1, 2026, as set out in Order in Council 373/2025. The HPOA will replace the existing Health Professions Act, and aims to modernize the regulatory framework for health professionals and occupations in BC and improve patient safety. Among other changes, the new legislation will create a new oversight body that will be responsible for preparing performance standards for regulators and guidelines with respect to regulatory best practices. The new Office of the Superintendent of Health Profession and Occupational Oversight will house a new independent discipline tribunal which will enable investigatory and disciplinary processes conducted with respect to licensees to be separated, ensuring the determination of discipline matters is independent of regulatory colleges and licensees and focused on protecting the public. The HPOA also creates a new complaints process and provides more flexible models of regulation for the practice of health occupations that present a lower risk of harm to the public. The new Health Professions and Occupations Regulation and the Health Professions and Occupations Transitional Regulation (No. 2), which align with the HPOA, will come into force at the same time. Quickscribe has published an early consolidated version of this Act for your convenience.

BC Court of Appeal Denies Sealing Order Sought by  
Health Professions Regulator
The British Columbia Court of Appeal has ruled that the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia failed to show that court openness would seriously risk achieving an important public interest in a civil case concerning opiate dosage. In College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia v. Madryga, 2025 BCCA 250, a patient filed a civil claim against the health professions regulator in February 2023. He alleged that he had been prescribed a high dosage of opioids to manage chronic, debilitating pain after a 1997 motor vehicle accident. Read the full article by Bernise Carolino with Canadian Lawyer.

Canada's Drug Agency Launches Public Consultation on Proposed
List of Essential Prescription Drugs and Related Products
On June 19, 2025, Canada's Drug Agency ("CDA") opened a public consultation to gather input on a proposed list of essential prescription drugs and related products. This initiative is part of the agency's responsibilities under the Pharmacare Act, SC 2024, c 24 which requires the development of a national formulary to support equitable access to key medications. The purpose of this consultation is to engage interested parties on the proposed list of essential prescription drugs and related products to inform the potential development of a national formulary.

Background
The Government of Canada directed CDA to establish an advisory panel to oversee the development of the essential drugs list. This panel, composed of 12 members with varied expertise, has conducted research and engaged with stakeholders to prepare a discussion paper which aims to outline the (i) methodology used for developing the proposed essential prescription drugs and related products list, including criteria for the inclusion and exclusion of products; (ii) proposed approach to updating the list over time; and (iii) products to be included on the proposed list to inform the potential development of a national formulary.

Read the full article by Sara Zborovski, Ian Trimble and Sandra Elashmouny with Stikeman Elliott LLP.

Drug User Advocacy Groups Challenge
'Recriminalization' in Court
The federal government was in court this week listening to arguments that it made a mistake when it allowed British Columbia to roll back its decriminalization pilot project. Counsel for a coalition of 13 drug user advocacy groups argued in an application for a judicial review that Health Canada didn't properly consider all the evidence before it when it broadly recriminalized public drug use in 2024. Canadian drug laws are set out in the federal Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. To provincially change drug laws for decriminalization, BC had to ask Health Canada for an exemption under the act. It later asked Health Canada to amend that exemption to recriminalize public drug use. Read the BIV article. 

Input Sought on Health Authority Review
Earlier this year, the provincial government launched a health authority review with the goal of ensuring that resource allocations are supporting critical patient services, and that resources support front-line patient care. UBCM is gathering input from members for the review. Local governments work closely with health authorities on issues such as pre-hospital care, regional hospital districts, and the recruitment and retention of health care professionals. Read the UBCM article.

Province Moves to Protect Supply of 
Two More Diabetes Drugs
The Province is limiting sales of the drugs tirzepatide and dulaglutide, commonly known by the brand names Mounjaro and Trulicity, to preserve the supply for people with diabetes who really need it. In April 2023, the provincial government added a "limits on sale" regulation to the Pharmacy Operations and Drug Scheduling Act to prevent sales of semaglutide (Ozempic, Wegovy, Rybelsus) to non-Canadian residents, to limit the impact of a supply shortage. Read the government news release.

Appellate Court Confirms Out-of-Province
Effect of BC Replacement Worker Ban
Can the British Columbia (BC) Labour Relations Board (the Board) order a BC employer to cease work that is taking place outside of the province during a labour dispute? According to the BC Court of Appeal, in some circumstances it can.

In Gate Gourmet Canada Inc. v. Unite Here, Local 40, 2025 BCCA 246, the BC Court of Appeal confirmed the Board can order an employer to cease work outside of the province if that work is being carried on in breach of a statutory prohibition on use of replacement workers during a labour dispute.

British Columbia's prohibition on replacement workers
BC's Labour Relations Code (the Code) prohibits employer use of replacement workers during a lawful strike or lockout. With narrow exceptions, an employer cannot engage temporary workers or its own employees to do the work of a striking or locked out bargaining unit. This prohibition extends to transferring work ordinarily performed by the bargaining unit to another location operated by the employer. Using replacement workers in contravention of the Code is classified as an unfair labour practice (a ULP) under the Code.

Read the full article by Herb Isherwood and Curtis Armstrong with Norton Rose Fulbright LLP.

Tribunal Decision on Intimate Images at
Work Raises Tough Questions for HR
A recent decision from the British Columbia Civil Resolution Tribunal (CRT) has put a spotlight on the intersection of employee privacy, workplace conduct, and the obligations of employers when faced with sensitive accusations. In MR v. SS, 2025 BCCRT 851, the tribunal dismissed a claim for damages after intimate images taken at work were shared with an employer by a former romantic partner.

The ruling, while limited in precedential value, prompts important questions for HR professionals about how to handle similar situations and where the line is drawn between privacy and the public interest. Read the full article by Stacy Thomas in the Canadian Lawyer magazine.

The Supreme Court of British Columbia Affirms Dependent
Contractor Status in Ursic v. Country Lumber Ltd.
In Ursic v. Country Lumber Ltd., the Supreme Court of British Columbia affirmed that employment relationships exist on a continuum between pure employee and pure independent contractor. Whether or not a contractor is really an employee is an issue that comes up frequently for employers to wrestle with and can have far-reaching effects (see Dentons insight, "Is your contractor really an employee?"). Somewhere in between contractor and employee, however, is a category known as "dependent contractors," which includes individuals who are economically dependent on a single entity, but whose engagement includes a combination of traits commonly applicable to both employees and independent contractors. The classification of an individual as an employee, independent contractor or dependent contractor is important because, unlike independent contractors, employees and dependent contractors are entitled to prior notice, or pay in lieu of notice, in the event of the termination of their engagement. Read the full article by Victoria Merritt, Salim Visram, Catherine Coulter and Maggie Sullivan with Dentons.

$200,000: Tribunal Orders Employer to Pay
Worker for Disability Discrimination
"Accommodation is a two-way street – the employee has an obligation to make their disability known to an employer, but once that's done explicitly, then the onus switches over to the employer to make reasonable inquiries and engage in the accommodation process."

So says Glen Stratton, an employment lawyer at Ascent Employment Law in Vancouver, after the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal ordered an employer to pay a worker more than $200,000 for disability discrimination that forced the worker to resign over health concerns during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Read the full article by Jeffrey R. Smith in the Canadian HRReporter.

Ironclad v West Kelowna Reversed: Court of Appeal Finds a 
Duty of Procedural Fairness in Setting Latecomer Fees
On June 11, 2025 the BC Court of Appeal reversed the earlier decision of the BC Supreme Court in Ironclad Developments Inc. v. West Kelowna (City), 2024 BCSC 1285 (the "Ironclad BCSC" decision) which we wrote about here. The Court of Appeal found in its decision, cited as 2025 BCCA 191, that there was a duty of procedural fairness where Madam Justice Hardwick of the BCSC had not.

The Decision Below
The underlying dispute in Ironclad BCSC arose when a developer, WestUrban, received approval to develop a property in West Kelowna (the "City") and the City required WestUrban to build "excess and extended services" (which can be roads, water, sewage, drainage facilities, etc. extending beyond the developer's own property). The City had a latecomer fee regime in place to recover the construction costs of excess and extended services proportionally from nearby property owners who benefit from their construction (in the form of "latecomer fees"), and to compensate the developer previously directed to build them.

Read the full article by Mel van Fram with SMS Law.

Transit-Oriented Development Legislation (TOD) –
Washington State
A shout out to PIBC Peer Learning Network for highlighting and sharing with its members the opportunity to learn more about Washington State's new TOD legislation. On August 19^th, Mpact will host a webinar on the new legislation, a model for adding new housing at scale and realizing the untapped potential of transit station areas. The session is free and you can register and learn more about the event here.

An Update to the Housing Supply Act –
Directives and Further Consequences
Over the last two years, we have published several articles on British Columbia's Housing Supply Act (the "Act"), tracking its enactment, the creation of associated regulation, and the imposition of housing target orders on various municipalities in the Province. Most recently, in response to advisor reports under the Act, the Minister of Housing and Municipal Affairs (the "Minister") has proposed to issue directives to the District of Oak Bay ("Oak Bay") and the District of West Vancouver ("West Vancouver") requiring the amendment of various land-use bylaws and plans. Read the full article published by Civic Legal LLP.

Commission Recommends Risk Assessments for
All Public Events
The Province has published the final report of the independent Commission of Inquiry into Community Events Safety. This report comes approximately one month after UBCM delivered its input to the Commission, and just over two months since the tragic events that took place during the City of Vancouver's Lapu-Lapu Day Festival. The Commission's report includes six recommendations for the Province's consideration. These recommendations are the culmination of the Commission's two-month study that included stakeholder engagement (e.g., written submissions, interviews, questionnaires), a jurisdictional scan, and review of local government bylaws and other relevant guidelines and processes. Read the UBCM article.

Routine Release Gets a Routine Check-Up
The Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia ("OIPC") released Investigation Report 25-01 earlier this year on local governments' disclosure of records under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act ("FIPPA"), identifying four specific issues and providing corresponding recommendations to improve upon freedom of information ("FOI") processes. One of the issues identified was in relation to the proactive disclosure of records, a type of routine release where records are publicly disclosed outside of a formal FOI request. Pursuant to section 71 of FIPPA, public bodies must establish categories of records that are available to the public without making an FOI request. Read the full article by Amy O'Connor published in the Young Anderson Newsletter Volume 36, Number 2 – LGMA Conference Issue.

Community Amenity Contributions Policy Found to
Be Improper Mandatory Payment Regime
In June 2025, Mr. Justice Coval found that the Township of Langley's Community Amenity Contributions (CAC) Policy constituted an improper mandatory amenity payment regime, which meant the CAC Policy was invalid and set aside. The decision is published as Lorval Developments Ltd. v. Langley (Township), 2025 BCSC 1148. The LGA allows local governments to impose development cost charges (DCCs) for certain off-site services; namely, water, sewer, drainage and roads and park land. But, over the past decade, local governments increasingly relied upon the rezoning process to negotiate and secure CACs such as affordable housing and contributions towards recreation facilities and other community amenities that cannot be funded through DCCs. Read the full article by Josh Krusell with SMS Law.

The BCSC Throws Out City Council's 
Unanimous Censuring of Its Mayor
Paull v. Quesnel (City), [2025] B.C.J. No. 332, British Columbia Supreme Court, March 3, 2025, H.W. Veenstra J.

The petitioner, mayor of the City of Quesnel, sought a judicial review of decisions made by the council of the City of Quesnel (the "City") leading up to and including three resolutions censuring and sanctioning him. These reprimands flowed from allegations relating to a book that disputed findings of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Particularly, the mayor's wife distributed the book, the mayor condoned the distribution and attempted to distribute the book at a regional district board meeting. Prior to passing the resolutions, the City Council was provided with a staff report that contained information on the potential censure and sanction of the mayor. The mayor argued the resolutions were procedurally unfair because the staff report was ambiguous and did not clearly indicate that censure and sanctions would be decided, and that the staff report failed to provide specific details and evidence about the alleged misconduct. Read the full article by Eric Mo with Harper Grey.

BC Government Launches Public Engagement on
Infrastructure Projects Act: What You Need to Know
The BC Ministry of Infrastructure has officially opened a province‑wide public engagement to gather feedback on the implementation of the Infrastructure Projects Act, passed just two months ago in May 2025.  In our article New legislation alert: Streamlined approval processes for major projects in B.C. and Canada, we examined the key features of recent legislative reforms – including B.C.'s Infrastructure Projects Act – which collectively aim to accelerate approvals for major infrastructure and energy projects. This newly announced engagement process is a major development in the implementation of the Infrastructure Projects Act. This article outlines the Province's public engagement initiative and what it means for proponents. Read the full article by Rick Williams, Chris Roine, Roark Lewis and Dalal Tubeishat with Borden Ladner Gervais LLP.

More Support for Builders Will Unlock More
New Homes in Metro Vancouver
Government has made regulatory changes that protect homebuilders' projects from increases in Metro Vancouver Regional District development cost charges, freeing up hundreds of millions of dollars in capital to invest in additional new homes. Eligible projects now will be protected from increases to development cost charges for 24 months instead of the previous 12. This will help to ensure that homebuilders, future homebuyers, renters and tradespeople in Metro Vancouver will have more certainty that housing projects, which are planned or under construction, will continue to be built. Read the government news release.

Heritage Conservation Act: Local Government
Engagement Opportunity
Senior and technical local government staff and elected officials are encouraged to attend a BC government webinar on proposed amendments to the Heritage Conservation Act (HCA) on August 12, 9am – noon PDT. Register in advance to ensure you receive an information package from the Ministry of Forests beforehand. Written submissions with feedback on the proposed amendments will be accepted until October 1, 2025 via email. Read the UBCM article.

The Rule of Law within a Legally Plural Society 
In R v Cavanaugh, 2025 BCCA 252 (Cavanaugh), the BC Court of Appeal (BCCA) touches on a number of important legal issues. An earlier post on this blog summarized parts of the case that deal with using the court's contempt power to punish the breach an injunction in a resource dispute. This post focuses on how the case builds on a developing body of case law in which courts are faced with reconciling the rule of law with the application of Indigenous laws.

Emerging Themes and Principles
In Canada, courts can be seen to engage with Indigenous laws using two broad approaches. The first, arises in the context of claims based on section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 where Indigenous law is often introduced as evidence to prove the existence of an Aboriginal right – as in Tsilhqot'in Nation v British Columbia, 2014 SCC 44 and Delgamuukw v British Columbia, [1997] 2 SCR 1010. Within this approach, Indigenous law may be received by Canadian courts as evidence that informs the development of principles recognized within Canadian constitutional law.

Read the full article by Llana Arreza with BCLI.

BC Seeks to Claw Back Future Ownership and
Breeding of Exotic Cats
When Bill Edwards feeds his pet servals Luna and Tumas on his rural Vancouver Island property, he cannot just simply reach for cans of cat food. He instead serves them raw chicken and frozen quail. "They are basically a wild animal," he said of the wildcats that are native to African savannahs and wetlands, and can grow to 40 pounds. "They are not like a house cat by any means." That is also why servals are being added to British Columbia's list of "controlled alien species" under the provincial Wildlife Act, banning the breeding, sale and future ownership of all exotic and non-domestic cats. Some 1,200 animals are already on that list, and if the legislation goes through, servals, ocelots and European wildcats won't be allowed as pets in the future. Provincial law already prohibits ownership of large cats such lions, tigers, jaguars, leopards and cheetahs. The proposed legislation announced on Tuesday [July 8] would allow current owners like Edwards – who sometimes refers to himself as Bill Exotic – and girlfriend Laurel Bablitz to keep Luna and Tumas, provided they apply for free permits. Read the full article published by the Canadian Press. 

BC Pledges Changes to Heritage Act to Help 
First Nations Protect Historical Sites
The BC government is looking to table a new Heritage Conservation Act [spring 2026] that will allow First Nations to better protect culturally significant sites that could be damaged by development. Updating the Heritage Conservation Act has been a priority for First Nations in order to protect cultural sites, spiritual sites, artifacts and burial grounds, says Judith Sayers, co-chair of the joint working group on First Nations Heritage Conservation. "We need to have more mechanisms to protect sites, we need the resources to be able to protect sites," said Sayers. "First Nations laws should be applying in these cases." Sayers said changes to the act would give First Nations a seat at the table when making decisions about projects, using the example of the Site C dam that flooded 83 kilometres between Fort St. John and Hudson's Hope. The Site C dam was also the subject of several lawsuits launched by First Nations who argued the project violated their treaty rights. Sayers, who is also president of the Nuu-chah-nulth Tribal Council, said the current act is out of date – it was last updated nearly 30 years ago – and with the developments happening on First Nations territories, they have more of a role in protecting their heritage sites. Read the CBC article.

BC Supreme Court Opens Civil and
Family Chambers Practice Review
The Supreme Court of British Columbia has announced the establishment of a civil and family chambers practice working group, which will review and consider possible adjustments to the court's present practices and procedures for regular (short) and long chambers. The review seeks to make the chambers process speedier and more efficient and respond to the issues arising from managing chambers practice, setting hearing dates, and timely hearing scheduled matters, according to a notice from Chief Justice Ron A. Skolrood of the BC Supreme Court. Read the full article by Bernise Carolino with Canadian Lawyer.

Revisiting the Insurance Broker's Role as Agent: 
Deasan Holdings Ltd. v. Continental Casualty Company, 2025 BCCA 177
In Deasan Holdings Ltd. v. Continental Casualty Company, 2025 BCCA 177, Deasan Holdings Ltd. ("Deasan") successfully appealed a decision of the BC Supreme Court finding that its insurer, Continental Casualty Company ("Continental"), had no duty to defend Deasan against claims following a landslide on its gravel pit property in 2018. The insurance policy in question was obtained through CMB Insurance Brokers (the "Broker") and had been issued in the name of D.R.S. Energy Services Inc. ("DRS"), a company affiliated with Deasan, but separate and distinct from Deasan. The Broker had been obtaining insurance for DRS since 2015. The Broker was aware of the relationship between Deasan and DRS and had initially obtained a policy under which Deasan was covered as an affiliated company. Read the full article by Ryan R. Lee and Alina Gdaniec with Watson Goepel LLP.

BC Court Clarifies Standards for AI-assisted Document
Production in Acciona v GVSDD
There have always been disagreements about the scope and sufficiency of discovery efforts where litigants are dealing with large-scale documentary discovery. The issue has become even more fraught where new AI technologies are deployed in attempts to make the process of identifying relevant documents more efficient. The recent decision of the BC trial court in Acciona Wastewater Solutions LP v Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District, 2025 BCSC 1256 (CanLII), explores some of the issues that can arise, and what standards are to be used by courts in determining what constitutes judicious (or improper) use of AI in gathering and producing documents to another party. In this decision, the defendant, Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District ("GVSDD"), brought an application for an order requiring the plaintiff, Acciona Wastewater Solutions LP ("Acciona") to amend its productions amounting to 4 million documents, claiming they had produced many irrelevant documents and their process amounted to a data dump. For its part, GVSDD had produced only 225,000 documents. Read the full article by Nicholas Kluge and Gretel Best with Gowling WLG.

The New "Significant": Lower Federal Threshold Will Require More
Businesses and Organizations to Register In-house Lobbyists
Beginning January 19, 2026, it will take a lot less for a business or organization to trigger the federal lobbying registration requirement in Canada. The Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada has released new guidance that significantly lowers the threshold for when businesses and organizations must register their in-house lobbying activities. If your staff collectively spends 8 hours on lobbying activities in any given consecutive 4-week period, your corporation or organization will have to register its federal lobbying activities, and meet ongoing reporting requirements. Below, we break down the new "significant part of duties" threshold and how it will affect businesses and organizations that communicate with federal public office holders. Read the full article by Awanish Sinha, Adam Goldenberg, Amanda Iarusso, K.C. and Will Dandie with McCarthy Tétrault. 

New Rules for Electric Vehicles Accessing HOV Lanes
The provincial government is changing the rules for electric vehicles wishing to access high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes. These changes affect municipal roads with HOV lanes and could trigger the need for municipalities to update road signage.

Starting August 15, 2025, drivers of electric vehicles will no longer be required to display a decal to drive in high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes when carrying less than the required number of passengers. Instead, electric vehicles can be driven in HOV lanes where signage allows it. Read the UBCM article.

BC Court of Appeal Allows Lawyer's Appeals in
Two Motor Vehicle Accident Cases
The British Columbia Court of Appeal has set aside a trial court's order upon finding that the judge failed to project a lawyer's likely earnings while considering her injuries after two motor vehicle accidents and other relevant contingencies.

In Aujla v. Boldt, 2025 BCCA 228, the first accident occurred in June 2015 on Ladner Trunk Road in Surrey while the appellant was a front-seat passenger in her father's car. She said she immediately experienced pain in her jaw, back, pelvis, and neck. Read the full article by Bernise Carolino in the Canadian Lawyer.

Floating Bus Stops and Human Rights Complaints
Floating bus stops, also known as island bus stops, are becoming more common as local governments increase cycling infrastructure. These bus stops feature a bike lane between the sidewalk and the bus stop, offering cyclists safety by separating them from vehicle traffic and ensuring buses do not obstruct the bike lane. However, these designs can create challenges for people with sight loss, as the quietness of bicycles and the surrounding road noise make it difficult to safely navigate to the bus stop.

BC has developed the Design Guide for Bus Stops Adjacent to Cycling Infrastructure to provide planning guidelines to construct floating bus stops. The 2019 iteration of this guide did not specifically consider people with sight loss, whereas the 2024 iteration of this guide specifically contemplates accommodating people with sight loss in response to the Belusic case discussed below. Read the full article by Emma McCann in the Young Anderson Newsletter Volume 36, Number 2.

Transport Canada: Summertime Safety: Camping and
Travelling with BBQ Propane Tanks
Summer is the perfect time for road trips, camping, and barbequing. Whether you're heading to a campground or enjoying a weekend BBQ with friends, it's common to pack extra fuel, like propane tanks for your grill. But before you load up your vehicle, it's important to know the rules around how much fuel you can legally and safely transport in your car or truck. Here's what you need to know to keep your trip safe and compliant. Read the article from Transport Canada.

Tribunal Orders ICBC to Increase Compensation to
B.C. Motorcyclist Injured in Crash
ICBC has been ordered by the civil resolution tribunal to increase its award for permanent injury compensation to a B.C. motorcyclist injured in a crash.

Ian Hugh Clements suffered multiple injuries after hitting a concrete barrier at a low speed and was granted $62,044.22 under guidelines ICBC uses with its no-fault insurance model to compensate for permanent impairment, it said.

His initial claim was for about that amount – for two colon surgeries, partial spleen removal, low hemoglobin, right and left shoulder injuries, a broken shin bone and partial blindness in his left eye. Read the Vancouver Sun article.

Transport Canada: Lithium Batteries Part 2: What
You Didn't Know About Travelling with Them
In Part 1, Transport Canada shared tips on how to handle lithium batteries safely in everyday situations. But what about when you fly? As Canadians travel more with battery-powered gadgets, it's crucial to know the air travel rules that keep everyone safe. Now in Part 2, we are focusing on lesser-known risks, air transport tips, and what international experts say about safely flying with lithium batteries. Read the Transport Canada notice.

Preparing for Takeoff: The Amended Air
Passenger Protection Regulations
Canada's Air Passenger Protection Regulations (the "Regulations") came into force in December 2019 and were created to provide a comprehensive air passenger protection regime relating to, amongst other things, flight cancellations, compensation, and clear communications. According to Transport Canada, the objective of the Regulations was "to create a more predictable and balanced approach to ensure that passengers know their rights; air carriers understand their obligations; operators do not face an undue burden or lose competitiveness that could negatively affect ticket prices for consumers; and proper complaint resolution and enforcement mechanisms are provided". Read the full article by Shree Majithia, Erika Swinton and Michael Parrish with Fasken.

CVSE Bulletins & Notices
The following documents were posted recently by CVSE:

• NSC Bulletin 02-2023 – Publication of Carriers Cancelled for Cause
• Notice 04-2025 – 2025 Vehicle Inspection Manual (VIM) – Effective September 2, 2025
• NSC Bulletin 01-2024 – Safety Rating Certificate and Status for B.C. Carriers

For more information on these and other items, visit the CVSE website.

Passenger Transportation Board Bulletins
The following updates were recently published by the BC Passenger Transportation Board:

News and Updates

• TNS geo-fencing around Vancouver Cruise Ship Terminal
  Following consultation with the City of Vancouver and the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, and in consideration of submissions from industry, the Passenger Transportation Board (Board) decided on July 8, to remove the transportation network services (TNS) geo-fencing term and condition around the Vancouver Cruise Ship Terminal. Read the full update.

Applications Received

• 22005-24 TNS – Halo Ride Hailing Ltd.
• 22442-25 – JGRS Staffing Ltd. (7 Horses Transport Solutions)
• 22492-25 – Whistler Resort Cabs Ltd.
• 22661-25 – Spoonbill Partners Inc. (Whistler Black Transportation)
• 22816-25 – Cobble Hill Taxi 2016 Ltd.
• 23060-25-25 – 7th Heaven International Ltd. (Mountain Shuttle and Cab)
• 22804-25 – Bluebird Cabs
• 23226-25 TNS – Super Arrow Logistics Inc. (Riden)

Application Decisions

• 23746-25 PS TOP – Fabulous Limousine Service Inc. [Approved]
• 23745-25 PS TOP – Island Chauffeur Inc. [Approved]
• 19967-24 TNS – Kabby Rides Inc. [Refused]
• 21060-24, 21061-24, 21062-24, 21063-24, 21064-24, 21066-24, 21067-24, 21068-24, 21070-24, 21071-24, 21072-24, 21073-24, 21074-24 – Bluebird Cabs Ltd. transfer of licence [Approved]
• 21888-24 – Taylor Dean Dzaman (Royal Limousine) [Refused]
• 21591-24 – Mojo Luxury Logistics Inc. (Vancouver Car Rental.ca) [Approved in Part]
• 23856-25 – Red Carpet Transportation Inc. [Approved]
• 22160-24 – Surrey Charter Bus Grove [Approved in Part]
• 21945-24 – Ark Cab Company Ltd. [Refused]
• 22427-25 – Divine Limousine Incorporated [Approved]
• 23521-25 – Safe and Sound Taxi Service [Approved in Part]
• 22421-25 – Primitivo Jr. Tanquilut (JT's Classic Ride) [Refused]

Visit the Passenger Transportation Board website for more information.

Consultation on Proposed Amendments to Part 12 of the 
Occupational Health and Safety Regulation
from WorkSafeBC:
Our Policy, Regulation and Research Department is requesting feedback on proposed amendments to Part 12, Tools, Machinery and Equipment, sections 12.74 to 12.80.2 – Automotive Lifts and Other Vehicle Supports, of the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation. The consultation phase gives stakeholders an opportunity to provide feedback before the proposed amendments are taken to public hearing. All stakeholder feedback is carefully considered and analyzed, and provided to WorkSafeBC's Board of Directors as part of their decision-making process. Proposed regulatory amendments under review:

• Part 12, Tools, Machinery and Equipment, sections 12.74 to 12.80.2 – Automotive Lifts and Other Vehicle Supports

Consultation on Proposed Amendments to Parts 4, 13, 14, 20, 28, and 31
of the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation
from WorkSafeBC:
Our Policy, Regulation and Research Department is requesting feedback on proposed amendments to multiple sections of Parts 4, 13, 14, 20, 28, and 31 of the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation, relating to periodic certification of equipment as safe for use. The consultation phase gives stakeholders an opportunity to provide feedback before the proposed amendments are taken to public hearing. All stakeholder feedback is carefully considered and analyzed, and provided to WorkSafeBC's Board of Directors as part of their decision-making process. Proposed regulatory amendments under review:

• Parts 4, 13, 14, 20, 28, and 31, multiple sections, relating to periodic certification of equipment as safe for use

Worker Injured in Fall from Loft
Date of incident: January 2022
Notice of incident number: 2022175280001
Employers: Concrete forming company; general construction contractor (prime contractor)

Incident Summary
At a residential house construction site, a worker was dismantling a temporary wood frame scaffold while standing on the floor of the loft, below the scaffold. When he removed the centre support of the scaffold, the I-joists that had been supported by the centre support fell. The worker was struck by a falling I-joist and knocked toward the edge of the loft, where he fell through an opening near the top of the stairs and landed on the main floor about 3.3 m (11 ft.) below. He sustained a serious injury.

Read the full WorkSafeBC report and investigation conclusion here.

September 2025 Public Hearing on Proposed
Regulatory Amendments
from WorkSafeBC:
WorkSafeBC is holding a virtual public hearing on proposed amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation. The virtual public hearing will be streamed live on September 24, 2025, in two sessions. The first will take place from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. and the second from 3 to 5 p.m. Further information on how to view or participate in the virtual public hearing will be provided closer to the hearing date. These details will be posted on worksafebc.com and communicated by enews. You can access the proposed amendments, along with explanatory notes, using the links below:

• Part 6, Substance Specific Requirements – Combustible Dusts
  
• Parts 8 and 31, Standards Updates

Public hearings provide stakeholders an opportunity to comment on proposed regulatory amendments. We welcome your feedback on these amendments either by written submission or by participation in the virtual public hearing. Written submissions will be accepted until 4:30 p.m. on Friday, September 26, 2025.

Supervisors in the Crosshairs
Canada's new era of criminal accountability in workplace safety

Canada's legal landscape around occupational health and safety (OHS) is shifting dramatically. Legal experts and safety professionals alike are observing a rising trend: frontline supervisors and small business owners increasingly face criminal charges following serious workplace incidents. At the Canadian Safety Summit held in Brampton, Ontario last month, three prominent legal minds delivered a stark message: the era of rare criminal enforcement is over. Read the full article published by Canadian Occupational Safety.

Worker Downplays Breach of Safety Policy, Gets Fired
A British Columbia employer had just cause to fire a worker who violated a safety policy and tried to minimize the risk involved, according to an arbitrator. West Fraser Mills (WFM) is a lumber company that operates a lumber mill in 100 Mile House, BC. It hired the worker in 2005, and he eventually took on the position of oiler at the mill. WFM had a lock-out procedure program and policy that were mandatory for employees performing work on energized equipment, including conveyor belts. Read the full article by Jeffrey R. Smith with Canadian HRReporter.

OHS Policies/Guidelines – Updates
Guidelines – Occupational Health and Safety Regulation
July 10, 2025
The following guideline was issued on July 1, 2025:

• Part 6 – Hazardous Drugs
  • G6.50(3) Mixing, preparing, and priming of specific hazardous drugs

Editorial revisions were made to the following guidelines:

• Part 3 – Occupational First Aid
  • G3.15-1 Nurses acting as first aid attendants in health care settings
  • G3.15-2 Registered nurses working for health authorities
  • G3.15-3 EMA licence holders working as first aid attendants
  • G3.15(c) Proof of certification
• Part 6 – Asbestos
  • G6.1-1 Definition of qualified person
  • G6.2.2(2) Details of the asbestos certificates
• Part 8 – Buoyancy Equipment
  • G8.27-2 Alternative acceptable standard for buoyancy equipment
• Part 9 – Hazard Assessment
  • G9.11 Confined spaces – Qualified persons
• Part 20 – Demolition
  • G20.112 Hazardous materials – Asbestos

Visit the WorkSafeBC website to explore this and previous updates.

Mortgage Services Act Coming into Force October 13, 2026
B.C. Reg. 108/2025 sets October 13, 2026 as the date that the new Mortgage Services Act (2022 Bill 29) comes into force. The Mortgage Services Act will replace the Mortgage Brokers Act and is intended to modernize regulation of mortgage brokers, lenders and administrators. The Act incorporates recommendations from the Commission of Inquiry into Money Laundering in B.C (the Cullen Commission), such as giving the BC Financial Services Authority (BCFSA) the ability to develop rules for licensing and licensee conduct and increasing financial penalties to align with the Real Estate Services Act. The new legislation also amends appeal procedures and establishes licensing levels and definitions for mortgage services to distinguish between the regulation of mortgage lenders, mortgage brokers and principal brokers. The new Act does not regulate mortgage business activities that are subject to federal or provincial regulation, such as banks and credit unions and their employees. This new legislation is in part a response to the Mortgage Brokers Act review, which included a public consultation in 2020. More information on that consultation, including the public consultation paper, can be found here.

Onward and Upward: More Support from BCSC in Dealing with
Restrictive Covenants Preventing High-Density Development
In a recent article, Jacob Gehlen wrote about the decision in Smith v Clearwater, where the BC Supreme Court exercised its discretion under section 35 of the Property Law Act (the "PLA") to cancel a restrictive covenant prohibiting multi-family development. Recent court decisions have addressed several similar matters, including DBKS Homes Ltd. v Taylor, 2025 BCSC 1202, where the Court used that same statutory discretion to alter a building scheme by removing a restriction on the density of a dwelling house. Both decisions seemingly broaden the court's discretion under section 35 of the PLA, providing avenues to modify long-standing property restrictions for purposes such as facilitating denser development. Read the full article by Matt McCarthy with SMS Law.

No-Show Landlord: Legal Consequences of a
Landlord's Failure to Occupy After Eviction
Ms. Jane Li was the owner of a property in Kelowna, BC. Starting in August 2020, Ms. Li entered into a residential tenancy agreement with Tina and Scott MacLean (the "MacLeans"). Ms. Li ended the tenancy, on the basis that she planned to reoccupy the unit, which the MacLeans disputed. The Residential Tenancy Branch arbitrator granted a monetary order against Ms. Li. Ms. Li sought to set aside the decision of the arbitrator of the Residential Tenancy Branch, or alternatively to have the decision remitted back to the Residential Tenancy Branch for reconsideration. The Residential Tenancy Act, S.B.C. 2002, c. 78 (the "Act") provides at section 49(3) that a landlord who is an individual may end a tenancy for a rental unit if the landlord or a close family member of the landlord intends in good faith to occupy the rental unit. However, the landlord must establish that the rental unit was being used for that purpose for at least six months. If the landlord is unable to establish that the rental unit was occupied as such, the landlord must pay the tenant an amount equivalent to twelve times the monthly rent. Section 51(3) provides an exception if the arbitrator finds that the landlord or close family member was unable to move into the unit due to extenuating circumstances. Read the full article by Claire Shanna with Harper Grey.

Shimco Lien Reaffirmed: B.C. Court of Appeal Clarifies
Dual-Lien Structure under the Builders Lien Act
In Kingdom Langley Project Ltd. Partnership v. WQC Mechanical Ltd. (Kingdom Langley), the British Columbia Court of Appeal reaffirmed the validity of what are commonly referred to as "Shimco liens." Shimco liens are liens against the statutory holdback that must be maintained by owners, contractors and subcontractors under the Builders Lien Act (Act). Shimco liens were recognized by the B.C. Court of Appeal in its much-debated 2003 ruling in Shimco Metal Erectors Ltd. v. North Vancouver (District) (Shimco). Shimco confirmed that the Act establishes a distinct lien against the holdback, separate and apart from a lien against land and improvements. Before a five-member division of the B.C. Court of Appeal, the Court in Kingdom Langley was invited to overturn Shimco. However, while admitting that Shimco has created certain practical difficulties for owners and contractors, the Court reaffirmed the dual-lien structure and confirmed that posting security under section 24 of the Act does not cancel or extinguish a lien against the holdback read the full article by Andrew Kavanagh, Alison Burns and Soheila Ebrahimi-Louyeh (Articling Student)with Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP.

Real Estate Purchaser Protections Upheld: B.C. Court of Appeal
Confirms that a Purchaser's lien Survives Despite an
Alternative Claim for Rescission
A certificate of pending litigation (CPL) is a powerful tool in the litigator's arsenal. It is often used in claims for specific performance and constructive trusts (both remedial and substantive) as a means to freeze title and prevent the owner from dealing with the property, as they otherwise might have. CPLs are available when the plaintiff claims an interest in land, and they are generally not available when the claim is for monetary relief.  The recent case of 1332404 B.C. Ltd. v. 1266685 B.C. Ltd., 2025 BCCA 46, highlights a nuance in this rule. In this case, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia held that a claim for purchaser's lien (security for a real estate deposit) can be the basis for a CPL, even when pleaded in the alternative to a claim for rescission or the return of a deposit. Read the full article by Matthew G. Swanson, Jake Cabott, Sarah Péloquin and Alysha Flipse with Borden Ladner Gervais LLP.

Lawyers Question Vancouver's 
Short-term Rental Rules
The owner of a downtown apartment has lost his fight to renew his short-term rental licence for 2025 after a panel comprised of three city councillors said they didn't believe he was using the unit as his principal residence. It was the second case this month where an owner questioned the City of Vancouver's definition of principal residence, with lawyers in both appeals pointing out there is no set number of days in a calendar year that a person can rent an apartment via an online short-term rental platform. In the most recent case involving Michael Enriquez, city staff's evidence showed that his apartment at 1068 Hornby St. was rented 277 days in 2024. That represented a 76 per cent booking rate via booking.com. In the other case, which went before the panel July 15, city staff said Deeno Mazhari rented his apartment at 1050 Burrard St. 439 out of 489 days between July 2023 and October 2024 via Airbnb. That represented a 90 per cent booking rate. Read the BIV article.

Updates to the 2025 CCDC Construction Management
Contracts: What You Nneed to Know
The Canadian Construction Documents Committee (CCDC) has released significant updates to several of its suite of construction contracts in June 2025. This includes a new version of the standard form construction management contracts: the CCDC 5A "Construction Management Contract – For Services," the CCDC 17 "Stipulated Price Contract Between Owner and Trade Contractor for Construction Management Projects," and the frequently used CCDC 5B "Construction Management Contract for Services and Construction." These revisions are designed to reflect evolving industry practices, recent legislative developments, and to harmonize with the changes previously introduced in the CCDC 2-2020 "Stipulated Price Contract." Most notably, the contracts are updated to address prompt payment and adjudication regimes introduced in Ontario, Alberta, and other provinces. This article briefly highlights some of the key changes but does not purport to cover all revisions made to the standard form contracts. The changes described below apply broadly to the CCDC 5A, CCDC 17, and CCDC 5B, unless specified otherwise. Terms defined in the CCDC 5A, CCDC 17, and CCDC 5B are used in this article. Read the full article by Karina Labelle and Edward (Ted) g. Betts with Gowling WLG.

Can We Change Council Eligibility?

Dear Tony:

Our strata corporation is 114-unit townhouse and because of historic harassment by a few owners and major road construction, no one is willing to stand on our strata council this year. We adjourned the AGM without a single candidate. Is it possible to amend the bylaws to allow for non-owners to be elected to strata council? We live in a self-managed bare land strata, retirement community, and owners and residents are simply not interested. – JPK

Dear JPK:

Under the Strata Property Act an owner, tenant assigned an owner's rights, or family tenant granted an owner's rights are eligible for strata council. Yes, a strata corporation may amend their bylaws to identify other classes of persons that may be elected to strata council. Buildings with age restrictions, a high ratio of rentals, or where there is a high level of conflict are struggling with the same issues

Read the full article by Tony Gioventu on Condo Smarts, published by CHOA.

Competition Bureau Issues Guidance on Competitor Property Controls –
Key Considerations for the Commercial Real Estate Sector
On June 4, 2025, the Competition Bureau released new guidance (the "Guidance") on competitor property controls under the Competition Act (the "Act"), marking a significant development in the Bureau's approach to commercial real estate practices. Competitor property controls—namely restrictive covenants, exclusivity clauses, and non-compete provisions—have long been a feature of commercial property sale and leasing arrangements in Canada. While these controls often serve legitimate business purposes, the Bureau observes that they may raise concerns under the abuse of dominance and anti-competitive collaboration provisions of the Act. The Guidance comes on the heels of significant amendments to these provisions, certain of which were motivated by the use of competitor property controls in the retail grocery sector. Read the full article by Kevin Wright, Wendy Sun and Samuel Bogetti with DLA Piper.

BC Fire Code Obligations

Dear Tony:

We received a notice from our fire service provider regarding the Fire Code. Are we to understand correctly that the volunteers on our strata council and owners are the ones who have to conduct routine testing and verify our fire safety system is operating correctly? To begin with, everyone is retired. We polled our owners and no one has any technical experience to determine if the system is operating correctly. Also no one is willing to assume the personal or corporate liability for an error or omission that may occur as a result of managing our system. Here is a direct quote from the handbook we received and the quote from the regulations. "Ensuring that fire protection systems are inspected, maintained, and serviced in accordance with the plan and the fire code, and where an inspection, maintenance, or testing procedure is beyond in-house capabilities, it is their (the property owner) responsibility to have qualified personnel complete the procedure." We also have the obligation to document: fire incidents, false alarms, fire drills, discharge or operation of fire equipment, training periods, and the name and location of persons requiring assistance (specifing assistance required). As well, we are required to document the minutes of fire safety meetings, which we have never conducted. This is overwhelming for our community and residents are concerned and stressed because they believe we are not complying with the law. Help! – Margery W. Victoria

Dear Margery:

I agree it is overwhelming. The regulations are intended to impose 100% of the obligation and liability on the property owners to ensure the fire safety systems are operational and tested; however, the regulation does provide a window to ease the responsibility. If the procedures are beyond the capabilities of the owners, it is their responsibility to have qualified personnel complete the procedures, therefore, you may contract out a number of services.

Read the full article by Tony Gioventu on Condo Smarts, published by CHOA.

Looks Can Be Deceiving: When Informal
Documents Are Deemed Valid Wills
Section 37 of British Columbia's Wills Estates and Succession Act (WESA) sets out three formal requirements for a valid will. The will must be in writing, signed by the will-maker in the presence of two or more witnesses, and signed by two or more witnesses in the presence of the will-maker.

However, a document that does not comply with the formal requirements of a will is not fatal to its validity – such a document may be cured in accordance with section 58 of WESA and still be found valid.

For a document to be cured under section 58 of WESA, the party seeking it to be cured must demonstrate (1) the testamentary document is authentic and (2) the testamentary document contains the full, final and fixed intention of the will-maker. Read the full article by Scott Boucher, Louise McLeod and Cailey Harris with Lawson Lundell.

Disinheriting Family – Can It Be Done?
In 2014, B.C. introduced the Wills, Estates and Succession Act ("WESA"), which effectively opened the gates for certain categories of individuals to bring court applications to vary another person's Will if they do not feel that they were adequately provided for by the deceased.

The only two groups of people who have standing to bring a will variation action ("WVAs") under section 60 of WESA are spouses, which includes common-law spouses, and children. Children include biological and legally adopted children. Stepchildren are excluded unless they have been legally adopted by the deceased. This has made it especially difficult to disinherit or exclude a spouse or child, subject to few exceptions. Read the full article by April Wilkinson with Harper Grey LLP.

The Unexpected Role of Tariffs in Estate Planning
The recent introduction of tariffs has contributed to global economic uncertainty, leading to a decline in the value of many investment portfolios and privately held businesses. For Canadians, this may be an appropriate time to revisit estate and succession planning.

While market volatility brings challenges, it may also present a valuable opportunity to reduce future tax exposure. One commonly used strategy – an estate freeze – allows business owners and investors to lock in today's lower asset values for tax purposes. This can help manage capital gains tax on death, reduce probate fees for an estate, and preserve wealth for children and future generations as part of a well-considered estate plan. Read the full article by Zachary Murphy-Rogers, Ryan Lincoln and Sarah Tang with Clark Wilson LLP.

"Until Death Do Us Part": Am I Responsible
for My Partner's Tax Bill?
Imagine learning, after your spouse's passing, that the Canada Revenue Agency is coming after you, for your spouse's tax debt. "Until death do us part" may have been a vow of love, but in the eyes of the tax authorities, the financial bond can linger well beyond the grave. If you receive assets from a deceased spouse who owed taxes, are you on the hook?

A recent Federal Court of Appeal decision highlights the importance of a direct beneficiary designation to protect retirement savings against estate claims, including unpaid taxes. Read the full article by Wendi P. Crowe and Megan Kennedy with Miller Thomson.