Spring Legislative Session
The spring legislative session wrapped up on May 29 with a total of 14 new bills passed, including two members' bills, the Eligibility to Hold Public Office Act and Perinatal and Postnatal Mental Health Strategy Act. Three of the bills introduced this session – the Health Care Costs Recovery Amendment Act, 2025, the Attorney General Statutes Amendment Act, 2025 and the Motor Vehicle Amendment Act, 2025 – were not passed but are slated for debate in the fall. The fall session is set to begin on October 6.
Attention Lawyers - CPD Credit Opportunity -
CLBC Webinar Video Released
Courthouse Libraries BC has released an edited video of the recent webinar "Discover the Benefits of Quickscribe". Presented by Mike Pasta, owner of Quickscribe, this webinar provides an overview of the latest features of Quickscribe Online, including an exclusive preview of Quickscribe's new AI research assistant, "Lexi" (beta). If you missed the live session, you can still earn a free CPD credit (practice management) by watching the video. Please feel free to share this video link with colleagues who might benefit from learning more about this innovative, BC-based service: https://vimeo.com/1079862354
The following bills were introduced in May:
For more information on the status of these or any other bills, visit our dedicated Bills page, located on the left navigation. If you wish to be notified when these or other changes come into force, check out Quickscribe's customizable alerts via the My Alerts page. Quickscribe alerts are included with your subscription so feel free to select the alerts that work best for you!
New Annotations have been added to Quickscribe:
If you wish to be alerted when new annotations are published by our contributors, select My Alerts via the top navigation, then select the "View Expert Annotators". Here you can view and "follow" any contributor from the list.
Tip: Log in to Quickscribe Online prior to clicking Reporter links. | │ | ![]() |
View the PDF version of the Reporter. |
Quickscribe Alerts
Are you looking for a more custom notification that will advise you about important developments that impact your specific area of interest? Quickscribe offers numerous customizable alerts – visit the My Alerts Page. Quickscribe alerts are included with your subscription, so feel free to select the alert that works best for you!
|
Want to Track Federal Laws?For notification of federal amendments, we recommend using our Section Tracking tool to keep informed on changes to federal laws. Look for the paw icon adjacent to the sections you wish to track.Looking for Previous Reporters?We have archived the Quickscribe Reporter going back to 2004. Visit the historical Reporter archives page. |
Get Ready: BC's New Commercial Liens Act
Comes into Force June 30, 2025
British Columbia's commercial lien regime is set for a significant
transformation. The Commercial Liens Act (the "CLA") and Commercial
Liens Regulation will come into force on June 30, 2025, following
the deposit of the supporting regulations on May 12, 2025. Liens are a key
tool for service providers to secure payment for the work they perform. They generally grant businesses, such as repairers,
warehousers, and common carriers, a legal right to retain a customer's property as security for payment or performance of an obligation. The
CLA replaces a patchwork of outdated statutes and common law principles with a unified, modern framework. It repeals the Repairers
Lien Act, Warehouse Lien Act, Livestock Lien Act, Tugboat Worker Lien
Act, Woodworker Lien Act, and common law possessory liens that secure
payment for services. Liens under the Builders Lien Act and the Forestry
Service Providers Protection Act remain unaffected. Read the full article posted by Miller Thomson LLP.
CSA Bring the Markets Back to LIFE
In connection with the Canadian Securities Administrators' ("CSA")
recent measures to support the competitiveness of Canada's capital
markets, the CSA have announced an increase to the amount of funds that
may be raised under the listed issuer financing exemption ("LIFE" or the "Exemption"). This relief has been implemented through Coordinated
Blanket Order 45-935 Exemptions from Certain Conditions of the Listed
Issuer Financing Exemption (the "Blanket Order"). The Blanket Order is
in effect and will expire on November 15, 2026, in Ontario. As we discussed in a previous post,
the Exemption came into force in November 2022 and provides issuers with listed equity securities that
meet certain qualification criteria with an efficient method of raising capital on a prospectus-exempt basis. An attractive feature is that
securities issued pursuant to a LIFE offering are freely tradeable. The CSA have indicated that while feedback regarding the Exemption
has been positive, market participants have noted that the capital raising limits have restricted the use of LIFE offerings. Prior to the
Blanket Order, issuers relying on the Exemption were limited to raising the greater of: (i) C$5 million; and (ii) 10% of the aggregate market
value of the issuer's listed securities to a maximum of C$10 million; during a 12-month period. Read the full article posted by Stikeman Elliott.
Amendments to the Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act:
What Businesses Need to Know
On February 25, 2025, the British Columbia provincial government introduced Bill 4, the Business Practices and Consumer Protection Amendment Act, 2025, which proposes significant changes to the BC Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act
(the "BPCPA"). On March 31, 2025, Bill 4 received Royal Assent and came into force, with the exception of certain provisions, which are pending
activation by regulation of the Lieutenant Governor in Council. Bill 4 seeks to strengthen consumer rights and align BC's consumer
protections laws with those of Ontario and Quebec. Amendments include prohibitions on certain arbitration clauses, places certain restrictions
on automatic renewals for subscription services, enhanced disclosure requirements for businesses, and provides consumers with expanded rights
to cancel contracts. Read the full article by
Rebecca von Rüti, Tyson Gratton and Jason Lin with DLA Piper LLP.
Buying Canadian: Recent Developments in
Canadian Public Procurement
Canada
is currently facing an erratic and expansive trade disruption
with its closest trading partner. The first executive order signed by
the President of the United States on Feb. 1, 2025, set out a blanket
tariff rate of 10 per cent on all imports from Mexico and Canada. The
President has since imposed higher rates on certain goods, including a
25 per cent rate on non-CUSMA compliant Canadian vehicles and on steel
and aluminium products. Following this latest imposition, tariffs have
been paused, altered, and expanded to encompass most of the world's
economies and several countries, including Canada, have imposed their
own tariffs on the U.S. Against this rapidly fluctuating economic
backdrop, Canada's federal, provincial and municipal governments have
signalled key policy shifts,
targeting reductions on barriers to internal trade and shifting public
sector procurement priorities and procedures to an approach favouring
Canadian suppliers. These policy shifts have thus far culminated in
numerous changes to public procurement at all levels of government,
raising questions of which entities qualify as a U.S. or a Canadian
supplier, how the changes impact entities from other countries and
whether these changes are likely here to stay. Read the full article by Marin Leci, Christian Halt, Erin Cutts and Bailey Collins with Borden Ladner Gervais LLP.
Supreme Court of Canada to Decide Scope of "Material Change" with
Far-Reaching Consequences for Securities Class Actions
The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) is set to issue its decision in
Lundin Mining Corporation v Dov Markowich (Markowich). This
highly
anticipated SCC decision regarding disclosure obligations could alter
the landscape for securities-based class actions by allowing more
investors to meet the leave test, subjecting public issuers to increased
litigation. Below is a summary of the key arguments made by the parties
during
the SCC appeal hearing, and the points to which the SCC paid close
attention to during oral argument. Read the full article by Douglas Fenton, Marshall Torgov, Josephine Bulat and Kanwar Brar with Bennett Jones.
BC Court of Appeal Upholds Damages Award of
$6 Million in Trust Breach Case
In
a case alleging breaches of two trusts, the British Columbia Court
of Appeal affirmed the damages awarded by a judge, who assessed them at
the highest trading value of the shares involved to deter faithless
fiduciaries. The discounted EVC units trust claim involved EVC units,
which were shares in Electrameccanica Vehicles Corp., a BC company with
attached
warrants. The respondents in Zhang v. Zhang, 2025 BCCA 143,
alleged they
suffered loss due to the appellants' refusal to sell shares and
warrants that the appellants held in trust for the respondents at a
favourable time. Read the full article by Bernise Carolino with Canadian Lawyer.
CSA Blanket Orders and the Rise of Alternative Fundraising
On April 17, 2025, the Canadian Securities Administrators ("CSA")
published a series of coordinated blanket orders
(the "Blanket Orders")
in recognition of the current uncertainty of global markets and to
support Canada's capital market activity in particular. The Blanket
Orders consist of: (1) Coordinated Blanket Order 41-930 Exemptions from
Certain Prospectus and Disclosure Requirements ("First Blanket Order");
(2) Coordinated Blanket Order 45-930 Prospectus Exemption for New
Reporting Issuers ("Second Blanket Order"); and (3) Coordinated Blanket
Order 45-933 Exemption from the Investment Limit under the Offering
Memorandum Prospectus Exemption to Exclude Reinvestment Amounts ("Third
Blanket Order"). The Blanket Orders aim to enhance the attractiveness of
the Canadian capital markets by fostering a more dynamic and
competitive market
environment that streamlines regulatory requirements for issuers
(including reducing the time and costs associated with preparing
disclosures related to prospectus filings, restructuring transactions
and bids). Read the full article by Clemens Mayr, Andrew Parker, Patrick Boucher, Hadrien Montagne, Geena Lee and Brianna A. Bernhardt with McCarthy Tétrault.
Updates to BC Sales Taxes
The following updates to sales taxes were recently posted:
Provincial sales tax (includes municipal and regional district tax)
Motor fuel tax and carbon tax
For more information, visit the BC government website.
BC Securities – Policies & Instruments
The following policies and instruments were recently published on the BCSC website:
For more information, visit the BC Securities website.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Economic Stabilization (Tariff Response) Act | NEW May 29/25 |
c. 11, SBC 2025, Bill 7, sections 6 to 22 (in force by Royal Assent) |
Income Tax Act | RETRO to Various Dates |
by 2025 Bill 5, c. 10, sections 3 to 22, 24, 25, 28 and 29 only (in force by Royal Assent), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2025 |
May 29/25 | by 2025 Bill 5, c. 10, sections 23 and 27 only (in force by Royal Assent), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2025 | |
Provincial Sales Tax Act |
May 29/25 | by 2025 Bill 5, c. 10, sections 30 and 32 only (in force by Royal Assent), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2025 |
Provincial Sales Tax Exemption and Refund Regulation (97/2013) | May 1/25 | by Reg 207/2022 as amended by Reg 56/2025 |
Provincial Sales Tax Regulation (96/2013) | May 1/25 | by Reg 207/2022 as amended by Reg 56/2025 |
Speculation and Vacancy Tax Act |
RETRO to Jan. 1/19 |
by 2025 Bill 5, c. 10, sections 35 and 38 only (in force by Royal Assent), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2025 |
Boeing Invests Millions in B.C., Quebec Projects
to Manufacture Sustainable Jet Fuel
Boeing Canada says it's investing millions of dollars into business ventures in B.C. and Quebec with the eventual goal of producing close to 200 million litres of sustainable jet fuel every year.
The announcement, made Wednesday, includes nearly $17.5 million split between two projects looking to turn wood waste and carbon captured from industrial smokestacks into sustainable aviation fuel.
The fuel, known in industry as SAF, has the potential to reduce carbon emissions by up to 80 per cent over its lifecycle and "offers the fastest route to decarbonization in the aviation sector," according to Boeing.
Boeing's latest investment will direct $10 million to Project Avance, a joint venture between Bioenergie AECN and Alder Renewables in Port Cartier, Que. The project aims to convert wood residue from sawmills into low-carbon bio-crude that can later be converted into almost 38 million litres of unblended jet fuel every year. Read the BIV article
BC Government Streamlines Renewable Energy Regulatory
Process and Announces 2025 Call for Power
On April 30, 2025, the Government of British Columbia tabled Bill 14, the Renewable Energy Projects (Streamlined Permitting) Act (Bill). The Bill would accelerate the permitting of renewable energy projects in the province by:
The province touts the Bill as a key measure to promote renewable energy sector growth as part of the British Columbia's new Clean Power Action Plan (Action Plan), released on May 5, 2025. The Action Plan outlines the government's strategy to double British Columbia's clean electricity supply by 2050 to meet growing demand from electrification and industrial development. The Bill will support this ambition by removing regulatory bottlenecks for renewable energy projects and infrastructure across the province. Read the full article by David Bursey, Jessica Kennedy, Larissa Sakumoto and Samantha Chenatte with Bennett Jones.
B.C. Leading Canada on Methane
Reduction, Says Analysis
B.C.'s goal to reduce methane emissions from the oil and gas sector is two years ahead of schedule, a new analysis has found.
Released by the Pembina Institute Thursday, the report found the province was the only one in Canada to meet its 2025 oil and gas methane emissions reduction target.
Between 2014 and 2023, natural gas production in B.C. grew 67 per cent. But over that same period, methane emissions associated with the industry fell 51 per cent – surpassing the 45 per cent reduction goal the province set for itself for 2025.
The progress is a positive sign for the industry at a time the carbon intensity of imports is becoming increasingly important to trading partners like the European Union, United Kingdom, South Korea and Japan, said Amanda Bryant, a senior analyst with the Pembina Institute who carried out the analysis. Read the BIV article.
Power Perspectives: British Columbia Regional Overview
This article originally appeared as a chapter in our Power Perspectives 2025 publication and provides a look back at some of the key developments in the British Columbia power market occurring in 2024. Power Perspectives 2025 provides an in-depth overview of the most significant developments in the Canadian power and emerging energy sectors in 2025. Updates have been included in this version of the British Columbia Regional Overview to reflect certain recent developments in 2025
In 2024, a significant response to BC Hydro and Power Authority's ("BC Hydro's") April 2024 call for power ("Power Call"), along with the advancement of a number of decarbonization initiatives in the province of British Columbia, signalled a bright future for clean energy production in British Columbia. Through the Power Call process, BC Hydro positioned itself to integrate more wind and solar energy into the grid by as early as 2028. In 2024, we also saw the utility continue its EPA Renewal Program, while several liquid natural gas projects in British Columbia achieved significant milestones and the long-awaited Site C hydroelectric project further progressed towards its operational date. Read the full article by Liezl Behm, Josh Friedman, Maureen Gillis, Selina Lee-Andersen, Genevieve Loxley, Sven O. Milelli, Dave Nikolejsin and Morgan Troke with McCarthy Tétrault.
Canadian Securities Regulators Propose Changes to NI 43-101
Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects
On February 13, 2025, the British Columbia Securities Commission (the "BCSC") released an Information Notice with drafts of proposed changes to National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects and its related companion policy and technical report form ("NI 43-101") (the "Proposed Amendments").
In the Information Notice, the BCSC advised that the Canadian Securities Administrators (the "CSA") intend to repeal and replace NI 43-101, Form 43-101F1 Technical Report (the "Technical Report Form"), and Companion Policy 43-101CP (the "Companion Policy"). The purpose of the Information Notice was to facilitate informal discussions in the mining industry relating to the Proposed Amendments. The Proposed Amendments are still under review by the CSA and subject to change. There is currently no set timeline for the CSA to commence a formal request for comment period, which would be followed by formal implementation of the amendments. Read the full article by Don Collie, Alan Monk and Desron Harry with DLA Piper.
Energy Resources Activities Act
Notice is hereby given that the areas associated with Wildlife Habitat Area (WHA) 1-028 established by order signed on January 15, 2003, WHA 1-028a established on May 1, 2015, WHA 1-183 established on December 4, 2006, and WHAs 1-315 and 1-380 established on March 23, 2018, are cancelled. Notice is hereby given that WHAs 1-028, 1-686, 1-692, 1-684, 1-687, 1-776, 1-685, 1-689, 1-777, 1-183, 1-315, 1-380, 1-779, 1-782, 1-785, 1-788, 1-279, 1-360, 1-384, 1-780, 1-783, 1-786, 1-789, 1-305, 1-366, 1-778, 1-781, 1-784, 1-787, and 1-790 were established for Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) on May 4, 2025, by order made under the authority of Section 30 of the Environmental Protection and Management Regulation (B.C. Reg. 200/2010). Details of the order may be obtained from the Ecosystems Section, West Coast Region, Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship, 2080 Labieux Road, Nanaimo, BC V9T 6J9. [my22]
CleanBC Review Launched to Strengthen
Climate Action, Results For People
The Province is launching an independent review of CleanBC programs to ensure they are effectively reducing emissions, while making life more affordable and supporting a strong economy.
CleanBC is B.C.'s road map for cutting climate pollution and building a cleaner, more sustainable future. It has helped people and businesses switch to cleaner energy, supported industrial decarbonization and expanded access to electric vehicles and renewable power. Read the government news release.
Updates to Natural Resource Taxes
The following update to natural resource taxes was recently posted:
Mining taxes
For more information, visit the BC government website.
BC Energy Regulator Announcements
The following BC Energy Regulator announcements were posted recently:
Visit the BC-ER website for more information.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Clean or Renewable Resource Regulation (291/2010) | May 30/25 | by Reg 69/2025 |
Mineral Tax Costs and Expenditures Regulation (405/98) | May 5/25 | by Reg 61/2025 |
BC Court of Appeal Sets Aside Striking of Ex-Wife's
Property Claim Against In-Laws
The British Columbia Court of Appeal has given a woman an opportunity to amend her counterclaim against her former husband's parents and sister regarding her alleged interest in two houses in Surrey, BC, which she claimed were family property.
In Bhatti v. Grewal, 2025 BCCA 138, the parties started living together in 2015, married in Abbotsford in August 2019, and separated in August 2021. The respondent ex-husband filed a family claim seeking a divorce in July 2022 and obtained the divorce order in February 2024.
In September 2022, the appellant ex-wife responded to the family claim and concurrently filed a counterclaim against her former spouse's parents and sister, who were the respondents by counterclaim. Read the full article by Bernise Carolino in the Canadian Lawyer.
B.C. Legal Institute Hopes to Increase Understanding
of Economic Abuse in Family Law
The British Columbia Law Institute (BCLI) is looking to shed some light on an issue that it says has been seriously under-explored in legal literature and case law – economic abuse in family law, especially as it relates to family businesses.
The institute recently issued its study paper on understanding economic abuse through family businesses in family law. It noted that family violence is often understood as physical and sexual violence, but economic abuse is a form of family violence that can have serious legal implications, particularly during a family breakdown.
BCLI staff lawyer Alison Wilkinson, who authored the paper, said that economic abuse is a form of coercive control that is probably the least well-understood and least-legislated form of family violence. Read the full article by Ian Burns on Law360 Canada.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Child Care Licensing Regulation (332/2007) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
Correction Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 148 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Crime Victim Assistance Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 174 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Representative for Children and Youth Regulation (103/2007) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
Vital Statistics Act Regulation (69/82) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
B.C. Court Clarifies Limits on Forestry Licence Rights Amid
Reconciliation and Ecosystem-Based Management Efforts
The British Columbia Supreme Court's decision in Teal Cedar v British Columbia [2025 BCSC 595] provides new guidance as to the limited nature of rights that forest licences in British Columbia convey to the licensee. The case also rejects novel arguments put forward respecting "partial constructive taking" where licenses may be affected in some way by changes to the regulatory landscape and confirms that an additional factor, reconciliation with Indigenous peoples, is indeed contemplated by B.C.'s forestry regime.
While the case explores many issues in expropriation law and the legal character of forest licences, questions remain to be answered in future cases as to the precise legal character of bodies established under government-to-government arrangements between Indigenous governments and the Crown. Read the full article by Lydia Young, Paul Seaman, Quinn Rochon and Wynona Klemt with Gowling WLG.
BC Court of Appeal Upholds Orders Requiring
Disclosures About Oil Shipments
The British Columbia Court of Appeal has affirmed a judgment determining that orders issued under s. 91.11 of division 2.1 of BC's Environmental Management Act, 2003 (EMA) – a provision focusing on spill planning, preparedness, and response – were operative.
The EMA, an environmental protection statute, regulates the intentional or accidental release of potentially harmful substances into the environment. In Canadian National Railway Company v. British Columbia (Environmental Management Act), 2025 BCCA 156, the appellants were interprovincial railways transporting petroleum products across borders. Read the full article by Bernise Carolino in the Canadian Lawyer.
B.C. Appoints Council to Improve Forest
Sector, and the Forestry Ecosystem
A council made of forestry professionals, educators, union and former industry officials has been brought together to find a balance between healthy forests and a prosperous industry.
The B.C. government announced the Provincial Forest Advisory Council on Thursday, appointed under the co-operation agreement it has with the two provincial Green Party members.
The council is expected to provide recommendations to support forest ecosystems at the same time as helping the forestry sector.
It comes amid a push to save more old-growth trees and a flagging industry as the United States threatens even further levies on Canadian softwood exports. Read the Financial Post article.
Overview of the Federal Plastics Registry
The Notice with respect to reporting of plastic resins and certain plastic products for the Federal Plastics Registry for 2024, 2025 and 2026 (the "Notice") was published, in the Canadian Gazette on April 20, 2024. The Notice established the Federal Plastics Registry (the "Registry") which requires companies to report annually on the quantity and types of plastic manufactured, imported and placed on the Canadian market. It also requires generators of packaging and plastic waste at industrial, commercial and institutional premises, as well as service providers who collect and manage those wastes, to report to the Registry. Reporting is mandatory, and companies that fail to meet their reporting requirements could face significant penalties. Read the full article by Cindy Vaillancourt and Gwenyth Wren with McCarthy Tétrault.
Are You Wildfire Ready? How BC Forestry Operations
Can Prepare for the 2025 Fire Season
Last year, wildfires burned more than one million hectares across British Columbia. As of May 23, 2025, eleven fires are burning out of control in several regions across the province and the BC Wildfire Service is forecasting yet another intense year.
With summer just around the corner, BC forestry operations are strongly encouraged to take proactive measures now by planning ahead, preparing crews and equipment, and being ready to respond swiftly if conditions escalate. Wildfires pose significant risks to workers, equipment, forest resources and surrounding communities and being prepared is essential to safeguarding lives, livelihoods and infrastructure from the growing threat of wildfires. Read the full article in the June 2025 issue of Forest Safety News.
Wildlife Habitat Areas
Notice is hereby given that the areas and General Wildlife Measures (GWMs) associated with Wildlife Habitat Areas (WHAs) 1-028 and 1-028a established by Government Action Regulation (GAR) Order signed on January 15, 2003 and May 1, 2015, respectively, in the South Island Forest District and WHAs 1-183 established on December 4, 2006 and WHAs 1-315 and 1-380 established on March 23, 2018 in the North Island Central Coast Forest District are cancelled. Notice is hereby given that the areas and General Wildlife Measures for WHAs 1-028, 1-686, 1-692, 1-684, 1-687, 1-776, 1-685, 1-689 and 1-777 in the South Island Forest District and WHAs 1-183, 1-315, 1-380, 1-779, 1-782, 1-785, 1-788, 1-279, 1-360, 1-384, 1-780, 1-783, 1-786, 1-789, 1-305, 1-366, 1-778, 1-781, 1-784, 1-787, and 1-790 in the North Island Central Coast Forest District were established for Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) on May 4, 2025, by order made under the authority of sections 9(2) and 10(1) of the Government Actions Regulation (B.C. Reg. 582/2004). Details of the GAR Order may be obtained from the Ecosystems Section, West Coast Region, Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship, 2080 Labieux Road, Nanaimo, BC V9T 6J9, or from the following website:
http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/cgi-bin/apps/faw/wharesult.cgi?search=show_approved [my22]
Notice is hereby given that Wildlife Habitat Area (WHA) 6-291 in the Nadina Natural Resource District, is established for Southern Mountain Caribou in the Skeena Region. The Orders were signed on May 13, 2025 under the authority of sections 9(1), 9(2) and 10(1) of the Government Actions Regulation (B.C. Reg. 582/2004) for the Forest and Range Practices Act and section 30 of the Environmental Protection and Management Regulation (B.C. Reg. 200/2010) of the Energy Resource Activities Act. Details of the Orders may be obtained from the Caribou Recovery Program, Skeena Region, Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship, 3726 Alfred Avenue, Smithers, BC V0J 2N0.
The Government Action Regulation Orders, accompanying map, and spatial files may also be obtained from
https://www.env.gov.bc.ca/cgi-bin/apps/faw/wharesult.cgi?search=show_approved [my15]
Environmental Appeal Board Decisions
The following Environmental Appeal Board decision was made recently:
Visit the Environmental Appeal Board website for more information.
Forest Appeals Commission Decisions
The following Forest Appeals Commission decision was made recently:
Visit the Forest Appeals Commission website for more information.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Conservation Officer Service Authority Regulation (318/2004) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
Fish and Seafood Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 175 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Livestock Identification Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 174 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Metal Dealers and Recyclers Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 160 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Professional Governance Act | May 29/25 | by 2025 Bill 13, c. 7, sections 73 to 77 only (in force by Royal Assent), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2025 |
Wildfire Act | May 29/25 | by 2025 Bill 13, c. 7, sections 1 to 6 only (in force by Royal Assent), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2025 |
BC Supreme Court Lets Civil Claims Proceed against
Doctors and Others Despite Delay
The
British Columbia Supreme Court found it in the interests of
justice for civil claims alleging defamation, negligent investigation,
and breaches of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms against
multiple defendants, including two doctors, to move forward despite
lengthy delays. In Dawson v Vancouver Coastal Health Authority (Vancouver General
Hospital), 2025 BCSC 862,
the plaintiff alleged that somebody reported
her to the Vancouver Police Department (VPD) for being suicidal and a
possible threat to herself and others in October 2015. The plaintiff
alleged the events that occurred that day. Read the full article by Bernise Carolino with Canadian Lawyer.
Executive Order Aimed at Reducing Prescription Drug Prices
Could Affect Prescription Drug Prices in Canada
On May 12, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order
(EO) titled "Delivering Most-Favored-Nation Prescription Drug Pricing to American Patients" aimed at reducing prescription drug prices for
Americans by ensuring they do not pay more than the lowest prices set in other developed nations. This EO could have an effect on drug prices
and availability globally, including in Canada. If Canada is included as a reference country for Most Favoured-Nation pricing, this may lead pharmaceutical companies to raise Canadian drug
prices to align with U.S. levels notwithstanding regulatory controls that apply in Canada. The Patented Medicine Prices Review Board
("PMPRB") is a quasi-judicial body charged with a regulatory mandate to prevent pharmaceutical patentees from charging consumers excessive
prices during the statutory monopoly period provided for patented medicines. Should the PMPRB intervene to prevent any price increases in
Canada, pharmaceutical companies may withdraw products from the Canadian market, leading to reduced drug availability in the country. Read the
full article by Noam Goodman, Cristina Mihalceanu and Nicole Nazareth with DLA Piper LLP.
Class-action Lawsuit Filed in BC over
2009 Interior Health Data Breach
British
Columbia's Interior Health Authority has been hit with a
class-action lawsuit over a data breach in 2009 that allegedly
compromised thousands of employees' personal information that ended up
being sold on the dark web. The lawsuit filed in B.C. Supreme Court on
Thursday [May 22] says the data
breach occurred in December 2009, exposing "highly sensitive" personal
information belonging to people who worked for the health authority
between 2003 and 2009. Court documents say the information was accessed
by "cybercriminals
and other malicious actors," and the "full extent" of the hack still
hasn't been disclosed by Interior Health in the 16 years since. Former
employee Rae Fergus, one of the lead plaintiffs, says her
personal information has been used since 2022 to fraudulently get a car
loan and a credit card, and to open a bank account without her
"knowledge or consent." Read the BIV article.
Howard Levitt: Think the Issue of Workplace Vaccine
Mandates Is Long-settled? Not Quite, Say Courts
There must be a sufficient connection between a worker's
responsibilities and the vaccination requirement to justify imposing 'the ultimate penalty'
Some employers (and employees) might believe that firing workers for non-compliance with vaccine mandates is settled law. After all, vaccines were the best response to a public health emergency and all levels of government both imposed and supported them. So, when an employee refuses to get vaccinated, one would think the employer has a pretty clear case for discharge. Now that the acute phase of COVID-19 has essentially ended, this topic may seem of little relevance. But the wheels of justice spin slowly and many cases are still winding their way through the courts. Read the full article by Howard Levitt with the Financial Post.
The End of Doctor's Notes? Proposed Changes to Short-Term,
Health-Related Leaves in British Columbia
Recently proposed amendments to British Columbia's Employment
Standards Act may eliminate, or significantly alter, the right of
employers to require their employees to produce medical notes for short-term, health-related leaves in British Columbia. Employers commonly request medical documentation when employees take
short-term leaves due to illness or injury ("health-related leaves"). As we discussed in a previous post, provincially-regulated employers in
British Columbia must provide eligible employees with five days of paid leave and three days of unpaid leave, annually, for absences related to
health, illness or injury. If requested by an employer, employees currently must provide reasonable proof of entitlement to such leaves,
typically in the form of a medical note. On April 15, 2025, the Ministry of Labour introduced Bill 11, the
Employment Standards Amendment Act, 2025, which may change an
employer's
right to request medical notes. If enacted, Bill 11 will prohibit
employers from requesting, and relieve employees from having to provide,
medical notes (in certain, yet-to-be-determined "specified
circumstances") in connection with short-term leaves for health,
illness, or injury of an employee or prescribed individuals. Under Bill
11, the specifics regarding the "specified circumstances" and
"prescribed individuals" covered by this prohibition will be established
in the future through new regulations. Read the full article by Erin Jackes with McCarthy Tétrault.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Mental Health Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 159 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Perinatal and Postnatal Mental Health Strategy Act | May 29/25 | c. 8, SBC 2025, Bill M204, whole Act in force by Royal Assent |
Pill Press and Related Equipment Control Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 175 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
New Prohibition on Use of Replacement Workers
Coming to Federally Regulated Workplaces
Bill C-58, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code and the Industrial Relations Board Regulations ("Bill C-58"), received Royal Assent on June 20, 2024. Bill C-58 implemented various amendments to the Canada Labour Code and Canada Industrial Relations Board Regulations, 2012 (the "Regulations") to expand the scope of the prohibition on employers' use of replacement workers during legal strikes and lockouts.
Both the Canada Labour Code and the Regulations apply to federally regulated workplaces in Canada, which include banks, telecommunications companies, and airlines. They do not apply to provincially regulated workplaces, which are instead governed by provincial employment and labour laws.
This article summarizes some of the key impacts of Bill C-58 on federally regulated workplaces starting June 20, 2025. Read the full article by Giovanna Di Sauro, David McDonald and Nella Garofalo with DLA Piper.
Not So Dependable? BC Court Says Employers May Not Expect Dependent
Contractors to Get Less Reasonable Notice than Employees
In the recent decision of Ursic v Country Lumber Ltd., 2025 BCSC 970 (Country Lumber), the Supreme Court of British Columbia held that there is no presumption that dependent contractors ought to receive less reasonable notice of termination than employees, distinguishing from prior case law suggesting otherwise. Rather, a dependent contractor's notice period must "reflect where a relationship falls on the continuum between employee and independent contractor".
A Distinction Without a Difference? Country Lumber Finds No Presumption of Reduced Reasonable Notice Period for Dependent Contractors
At common law, there is a longstanding principle that employees are entitled to reasonable notice of termination or damages in lieu thereof (subject to a valid agreement ousting that right). Independent contractors do not enjoy this entitlement. However, courts have recognized that workplace relationships may exist on a "continuum" between pure employee and pure independent contractor, with an intermediate category of "dependent contractor" that may only be terminated upon reasonable notice. In Country Lumber, the Court examined the question of whether dependent contractors should receive the same or less notice as an employee would receive.
Read the full article by David M. Price and Cameron Penn with Bennett Jones.
BC's New Minimum Wage Takes Effect June 1
On June 1st, 2025, British Columbia's lowest paid workers received a 2.6% pay hike to $17.85, up from $17.40. The amount is based on last year's average inflation rate. The increase also applies to minimum-wage rates for resident caretakers, live-in home-support workers, live-in camp leaders and app-based delivery and ride-hail service workers.
Mental Health Accommodation Policies and Procedures
in the Workplace: Practical Guidance for Employers
With an estimated one in three Canadians being affected by a mental illness in their lifetime, mental health challenges can have a significant impact on the Canadian workforce, and it is crucial that employers address these challenges effectively.
A solid accommodation policy is essential for every workplace, especially since many provinces lack clear legislation on the accommodation process. Creating a policy sets clear expectations, reducing confusion and ensuring everyone knows their roles. It's also important that the policy aligns with human rights laws, which can vary by province.
In addition to the policy, establishing clear accommodation procedures is crucial. A step-by-step process helps employers respond quickly and consistently to requests. Formal procedures ensure fairness and consistency in evaluating requests and determining whether accommodations can be made without undue hardship. It is vital that managers and HR staff are well-informed and aligned. Read the full summary of an online guidance session, hosted by lawyers Shelley-Mae Mitchell, Kailey Hubele, Laura Mensch, Jessica Wuergler, Dan Palayew, Kate Agyemang and Catherine Pronovost with Borden Ladner Gervais LLP.
Upcoming Deadlines for Complying with
Federal Pay Equity Legislation
Another compliance deadline is approaching under the federal Pay Equity Act – federally regulated employers are required to file an annual statement with the Office of the Pay Equity Commissioner on or before June 30, 2025, if they posted a pay equity plan in the previous year. This annual reporting obligation continues to apply every year thereafter.
The Pay Equity Act (the Act), which came into force on August 31, 2021, requires federally regulated employers to proactively address systemic gender-based discrimination in compensation practices by determining whether there are gaps in pay between employees in predominantly female job classes and those in similarly valued predominantly male job classes.
Most subject employers should have posted their final pay equity plans and notices of pay increases by September 3, 2024, unless a filing deadline extension was authorized by the Office of the Pay Equity Commissioner (the Pay Equity Office). Below, we will discuss upcoming deadlines and other information relevant to employers subject to the Act. Read the full article by Jennifer Hodgins with Norton Rose Fulbright.
Privacy in the Remote Workplace
Hybrid or remote work arrangements become increasingly common, bringing with it benefits such as more flexible work schedules for workers, and a wider potential talent pool and decreased overhead for employers. Meanwhile, organisations may have concerns about how to protect sensitive or proprietary information and ensure their policies are being followed in a hybrid workplace, and take steps to further these objectives. As companies adapt to this relatively new model of work, it is important for employers to know how to implement policies and procedures respectfully and lawfully, just as it is for employees to understand their privacy rights in the workplace.
Privacy legislation in BC
In BC, the law that applies to your workplace varies depending on what type of organization you or your employer are:
- Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA): Applies to private sector employers in BC.
- Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA): Applies to federally-regulated employers (e.g. banking, aviation).
- Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act: Applies to BC government employers.
- Privacy Act: Applies to federal government employers.
Read the full article from Overholt Law LLP.
Government Refuses to Fix Known Unfairness in Pandemic
Worker Benefit, Ombudsperson Finds
BC Ombudsperson Jay Chalke has released a new report finding that the provincial government unjustly required some workers to repay the $1,000 BC Emergency Benefit for Workers (BCEBW) – and later refused to correct the unfairness, despite previously fixing another nearly identical problem.
The BCEBW was introduced by the province in 2020 to support people who lost their job due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Initially, to qualify, recipients had to be receiving the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB), a pandemic-specific federal benefit. To move quickly, the province used eligibility for CERB as a proxy for determining who should get the BCEBW, but it was unaware that some people who had lost their job due to COVID-19 were being routed by the federal government to two other federal benefits. Read the full article from the Office of the Ombudsperson.
B.C. Releases Second Annual Pay Transparency Report
Government has released its second annual Pay Transparency Report, showing modest improvements to the gender pay gap in the province.
The biggest improvements in the gender pay gap since 2023 were noted in three sectors, analyzed using Statistics Canada data categorized by the North American Industry Classification System. In agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, there was an improvement from a gap of 45% down to 36%. The gap shrank from 24% to 17% in mining, quarrying and oil-and-gas extraction. Wholesale trade saw a positive shift from 18% down to 11%. Read the government news release.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Criminal Records Review Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, sections 149 and 150 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Security Services Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 176 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Security Services Regulation (207/2008) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
When Tax Collection Goes Wrong
The
collection of property taxes from ratepayers is a core function of
British Columbia municipalities. Most of the time, taxes are imposed
and collected without much fuss. On occasion, a municipal collector
might discover that the municipality has made a mistake. This mistake
could be a miscalculation in a tax notice, a misapplied payment or a
misdirected refund. A larger error, such as an improperly imposed tax,
could impact hundreds or thousands of ratepayers. Some mistakes can be
more easily and cheaply addressed than others. This paper will discuss
several scenarios involving municipal missteps in tax collection. A
municipality is statutorily obliged to issue a tax notice to "each
owner of property subject to tax" under section 237(1) of the Community Charter, R.S.B.C. 2003, c. 26. The tax notice must include a statement
of the taxes imposed for the current year, including property value taxes. Although contemporary software can significantly reduce the
frequency of errors, it remains possible that a tax notice states an incorrect amount of taxes owing because of an arithmetic mistake, a data
entry error or a failure to properly apply a tax exemption. Read the full article by Michael Moll and Aidan Andrews with Civic Legal LLP.
What is a "Transmission Line"? Supreme Court of Canada Confirms that
Telecom Companies must Negotiate with Local Governments to Install
5G
Wireless Technology on Public Land
Under Canada's constitution, telecommunication is a matter of
exclusive federal jurisdiction. Neither the Province nor local governments have regulatory authority over telecommunications. The
federal i gives telecom carriers (phone companies) a qualified right of access to construct and operate their transmission
lines using local government property such as road right of ways. If a telecom carrier wants to attach a telephone wire to the flagpole outside
city hall, or a bus shelter on a suburban street, and cannot get the local government's approval, the carrier can apply to the Canadian
Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) for permission, despite local government objections. In Telus Communications Inc. v. Federation of Canadian
Municipalities, 2025 SCC 15, the Supreme Court of Canada had to decide
whether the same access regime applies to wireless telecommunications infrastructure, specifically "5G small cell antennas." The Court
concluded it did not and that to install small cell equipment on local government infrastructure, telecom carriers must secure the local
government's agreement. Read the full article by Ramon Dabiryan and Lynda Stokes with Young Anderson Barristers & Solicitors.
Update on The Proposed Bill 15 –
2025 Infrastructure Projects Act
We previously reported on the proposed Bill 15: Infrastructure
Projects Act, here, aimed to expedite the construction of infrastructure
projects in BC deemed provincially significant, including hospitals, schools, housing, and resource developments in BC. Over the last few weeks, the Bill faced mounting criticism from local
governments, First Nations, opposition MLAs, and environmental organizations in response to the Bill, including concerns with respect
to potential risks if the proposed law was passed (such as pushing through projects without proper consultation or adequate oversight). Read the full article by Kim Do and Roy Nieuwenburg, K.C. with Clark Wilson LLP.
Province's Announces New Electricity Roadmap
On May 5, 2025, the Province released a new Clean Power Action Plan
to outline how it intends to address anticipated increases in electricity demand from population growth, economic development, and
electrification.The plan outlines new investments in renewable electricity and places
a strong emphasis on collaboration with First Nations to develop new energy projects, and introduces measures aimed at increasing the
electricity supply. It also includes initiatives to upgrade infrastructure, improve energy efficiency and enhance system
flexibility. These measures aim to support BC's transition to a lower-carbon economy while maintaining a stable and resilient power
grid. Read the UBCM article.
$295,000: BC City Fires Worker over
'Unreconciled' Gift Card Purchases
The British Columbia city of Richmond has fired an employee over a
case of theft that spanned a couple of years, according to media reports. The city confirmed the termination after a routine audit uncovered
significant discrepancies in its gift card program, which had issued gift cards to employees as rewards for performance, long service,
retirement, and participation in charitable activities, reports the Vancouver Sun. An internal review revealed that the city purchased approximately
$446,000 worth of gift cards between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2024. Of that amount, $121,000 was properly distributed, and another
$31,000 remains in the custody of the human resources department. Read the full article published by Canadian HRReporter.
It's Time to Deliver: Mayors Call for Mature, Pragmatic
Coordination across All Governments to
Meet Canada's Housing Goals
Canada's pledge to build 500,000 homes each year will only succeed if
federal, provincial, territorial, and municipal governments are working together—aligning investments, focusing on shared priorities, and
resourcing the levers that deliver results. That's the message from the Federation of Canadian Municipalities' (FCM) Big City Mayors' Caucus as
local leaders gather in Ottawa for FCM's Annual Conference and Trade Show. "We agree with the Prime Minister—it's time to build. But we can't
build without delivery—and delivery happens when governments are aligned; resources are targeted, and municipalities are equipped to do
the work on the ground. Delivery happens when governments are aligned, resources are targeted, and municipalities are equipped to do the work
on the ground." said FCM President Rebecca Bligh. Read the full news release posted by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Assessment Authority Act | June 1/25 | by 2025 Bill 5, c. 10, section 2 only (in force by Royal Assent), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2025 |
Cannabis Control and Licensing Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, sections 174 and 175 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Community Charter | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 146 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Community Charter Bylaw Enforcement Ticket Regulation (425/2003) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
Density Benefits Zoning Bylaws Amendment Deadline Regulation (62/2025) | NEW May 5/25 |
see Reg 62/2025 |
Disposal of Property in Police Possession Regulation (366/2003) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
Eligibility to Hold Public Office Act | NEW May 29/25 |
c. 9, SBC 2025, Bill M202, whole Act in force on Royal Assent |
Emergency Communications Corporations Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 146 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Gas Safety Regulation (103/2004) | May 1/25 | by Reg 51/2025 |
Housing Supply Act | May 29/25 | by 2025 Bill 13, c. 7, sections 1 to 7 only (in force by Royal Assent), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2025 |
Housing Supply Regulation (133/2023) | May 29/25 | by Reg /2025 |
Information Management Systems (Digital Evidence Management System) Regulation (309/2021) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
Infrastructure Projects Act | NEW May 29/25 |
c. 13, SBC 2025, Bill 15, section 2 only (in force by Royal Assent) |
Liquor Control and Licensing Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, sections 174 and 175 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Liquor Control and Licensing Regulation (241/2016) | May 20/25 | by Reg 66/2025 |
Local Government Act | RETRO to Apr. 25/24 |
by 2025 Bill 13, c. 7, section 45 only (in force by Royal Assent), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2025 |
May 29/25 | by 2025 Bill 13, c. 7, sections 38, 39 and 41 to 44 only (in force by Royal Assent), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2025 | |
Local Government Transit-Oriented Areas Regulation (263/2003) | May 2/25 | by Reg 60/2025 |
Provincial Symbols and Honours Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 166 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Railway Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 176 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Safety Standards Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 169 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
School Act |
May 29/25 | by 2025 Bill 5, c. 10, section 33 only (in force by Royal Assent), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2025 |
South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority Act |
May 29/25 | by 2025 Bill 5, c. 10, section 34 only (in force by Royal Assent), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2025 |
Taxation (Rural Area) Act | May 29/25 | by 2025 Bill 5, c. 10, section 40 only (in force by Royal Assent), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2025 |
Vancouver Charter | RETRO to Apr. 25/24 |
by 2025 Bill 13, c. 7, section 65 only (in force by Royal Assent), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2025 |
May 29/25 | by 2025 Bill 13, c. 7, sections 47, 61 to 64 and 66 only (in force by Royal Assent), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2025 | |
Vancouver Charter By-law Enforcement Ticket Regulation (189/2007) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
BC Supreme Court Lets Plaintiff Claiming Statutory
Privacy Tort Amend Certification Order
The British Columbia Supreme Court allowed an application to amend a
certification order to add a common issue and a subclass relating to alleged violations of privacy statutes in BC, Saskatchewan, Manitoba,
and Newfoundland and Labrador. In Tucci v Peoples Trust Company, 2025 BCSC 816,
the plaintiff filed three applications against the defendant, Peoples Trust Company. The first application wanted to amend the certification
order under s. 8(3) of BC's Class Proceedings Act, 1996. The first application sought to add a common issue regarding alleged violations of s. 1(1) of BC's Privacy Act, 1996;
ss. 2(1) and 2(2) of Manitoba's Privacy Act; s. 2 of Saskatchewan's
Privacy Act, 1978; and s. 3(1) of NL's Privacy Act, 1990. Read the full
article by Bernise Carolino with Canadian Lawyer.
Could We Finally Have a Gender-neutral
Canadian Citizenship Law?
An examination of proposed amendments to the Citizenship Act
The proposed amendments under Bill C-71 may finally create truly gender-neutral Canadian citizenship law by eliminating outdated distinctions and ensuring equal citizenship rights for all descendants of Canadian ancestors.
Gender's Role in Citizenship Law
Citizenship is a unique area of law, as it reflects the values of society at a given time. The laws governing citizenship are not just legal frameworks, they are a mirror of the values of society. This is why changes in citizenship laws often accompany significant social transformations. They must align with the evolving values and principles of the community.
Read the BarTalk article by Amandeep Hayer.
It's Been a Privilege: Recent Decision Highlights Need for
Regulators to Not Trample over Privilege [Privacy Act]
The recent decision of the British Columbia Court of Appeal, Lamarche
v. British Columbia (Securities Commission), confirms that a
regulator
may face civil liability if it does not appropriately protect privilege
during an investigation. Although the decision concerns the British
Columbia Privacy Act,
which creates a tort for intentional breach of
privacy, it has broader implications given similar statutory privacy
torts in other provinces and similarities to the common law privacy
tort.
Read the full article by Shane C. D'Souza, Owais Ahmed and Natalie V. Kolos with McCarthy Tétrault.Background
The British Columbia Securities Commission compelled the email records of Jean Andre Lamarche from a third party as part of its investigation into alleged unregistered trading and advising. Lamarche sued the Commission, alleging that the Commission knew or ought to have known that their investigation would capture solicitor-client privileged information and they took no steps to protect that privilege. Among other things, he sought damages under the Privacy Act. Most of the lawsuit was stayed but notably, Lamarche's claim under the Privacy Act was not struck by the Court of Appeal.
Supreme Court to Hear Appeal in Democracy Watch v.
Attorney
General of Canada: Implications for Judicial
Review and Legislative
Sovereignty
The fact that the Supreme Court will hear
this case is significant as
the matter involves a fundamental issue that has yet to be dealt with
in a definitive manner by the courts (as the Federal Court of Appeal has
itself recognized at the outset in its decision). Specifically, whether
Parliament (or a provincial legislature) may limit applicants' ability
to bring judicial review applications through statute – that is, whether
or not partial restrictions on judicial review in the applicable
statute are valid or offend the rule of law. As the Supreme Court made
clear in Canada, legislative intent is the "polar star" of judicial
review and "[b]ecause administrative decision
makers receive their powers by statute, the governing statutory scheme
is likely to be the most salient aspect of the legal context relevant to
a particular decision." However, Democracy Watch highlights the tension between the
deference afforded to the legislature in its choices to delegate authority to administrative decision-makers and the rule of law – one of
the underlying principles on which Canada's constitutional order is founded. In this case, the applicant sought judicial review of a report by the
federal Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, alleging that the Commissioner had committed two errors of law and one error of fact in
the report. The report ultimately concluded that then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau did not contravene the Conflict of Interest Act when
he participated in two decisions involving WE Charity. Read the full
article by Peter N. Mantas and Alexandra Logvin with Fasken Martineau
DuMoulin LLP.
Will Trade Tensions and Politics
Impact the Practice of IP?
I became an intellectual property (IP) lawyer somewhat
by chance. The practice of IP is the best (though, not having practised in any other
fields, you will have to take the "best" claim with a grain of salt). I meet interesting innovators and accompany them on their
commercialization journey. Additionally, during turbulent financial times, I have observed firsthand that the practice of IP can be
resilient. After all, the journey of obtaining and maintaining IP assets is a long one, and companies may pause deal-making but continue to
maintain their valuable IP assets. I have seen the IP practice maintain its profitability during the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19
pandemic recession. Now, our world is facing trade and political tensions, and I wonder whether this time will be different and whether
these tensions will negatively impact IP practice in a significant way. Perhaps the practice of IP will continue to be resilient. I recently
read Jake Schindler's publication
on "new regulations that give Beijing trade war tools while also
showing a growing emphasis on protecting homegrown innovation overseas."
The
article discusses China's commitment to bolstering its IP management
capabilities and addressing international IP disputes. Read the full
article by Jayde Wood, published on BarTalk.
Supreme Court Clarifies Rules for Sentencing Credits
While the decision says judges can consider the time offenders need
for treatment when determining sentences, it doesn't engage with realities of corrections
The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that even though sentences can take rehabilitative programming into account, enhanced sentencing credits should be granted for time spent in a mental health facility. In the 9-0 decision, the Court also clarified what counts as "wrongful conduct" when denying sentencing credits, but declined to offer a comprehensive definition of said conduct. The case centres around a man known as JW, who is Indigenous and cognitively impaired, and the sexual assault of a worker at his group home in May 2018. While in pre-trial custody, he dismissed his counsel on three separate occasions and backed out of three plea deals. In 2020, he was sent for a mental health assessment and found unfit to stand trial after being diagnosed with disorganized schizophrenia. Read the full article by Dale Smith with CBA National.
BC Loosens Lobbying Rules, Reducing
Transparency Requirements
The BC government is set to loosen a law that requires lobbyists to
report how they are attempting to influence elected officials. The Lobbyists Transparency Act requires
those engaged in lobbying to register their activities and report how they intend to influence government decision-making. Last April, the B.C. government passed amendments
to weaken those requirements in a move the Ministry of the Attorney
General says will benefit smaller organizations, like non-profits. The
changes, which will come into force at the end of May [now in
force], remove requirements to report requests for government funding.
They also reduce the frequency – from monthly reports to once every
three months – registered lobbyists need to disclose how much money they
ultimately receive. Read the BIV article.
More Than Mere Opportunity: BC Court of Appeal Reaffirms
Strong Connections Test for Vicarious Liability
In H.N. v. School District No. 61 (Greater Victoria), 2025 BCCA 144,
the BC Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed the appeal by the Plaintiff, H.N., arising from the trial judge's finding that the School
District No. 61 (Greater Victoria) (the "District") was
not vicariously liable for the sexual abuse perpetrated by the
Plaintiff's English tutor, Gary Redgate (now deceased). This decision
provides two key takeaways. First, it provides guidance
with respect to the Court's use of precedent in analyzing whether
vicarious liability is established. Secondly, it emphasizes the
importance of analyzing whether there is a sufficient connection between
the duties and responsibilities of an employee, and the wrongful act,
in finding an employer vicariously liable. A mere opportunity for abuse
is insufficient to impose vicarious liability. Read the full article by
Melissa Ku and Genevieve Smith with Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP.
CIArb Issues Its First Guidelines for the
Use of AI in Arbitration
The Charter Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb) recently published its Guideline on the Use of AI in Arbitration (2025)
(Guidelines) to provide guidance on how to take advantage of the growing benefits of artificial intelligence (AI) while mitigating some
of the associated risks. The Guidelines, broken down into four parts, address issues that participants in arbitration proceedings should consider when resorting
to AI tools and resources. The Guidelines also include a model agreement on the use of AI in arbitration and two model procedural orders on the
use of AI. Read the full article by Patrick Lapierre, Gina Murray and Emma Tucker (Articling Student) with Blakes.
BC Bills 14 and 15: A Setback for Indigenous
Rights and Reconciliation
In a significant retreat from its commitment to reconciliation and
the implementation of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), the British Columbia provincial government
recently tabled two controversial bills: Bill 14, the Renewable Energy
Projects (Streamlined Permitting) Act, and Bill 15, the Infrastructure
Projects Act. Below is an overview of the Bills and some primary concerns. For more
information, our full analysis can be found here: 2025-05-28 BC Bills
14 and 15 A Setback for Indigenous Rights and Reconciliation. Read the full article by Stephanie Axmann, Craig Empson, Candace Charlie and Emmaline English with Woodward & Company LLP.
An Outdated Patchwork
A new CBA report is calling for a reimagined overhaul of Canada's immigration system
The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act is showing its age and needs an overhaul. That's the overarching message in a new report drafted by the Canadian Bar Association's immigration law section. The report has been presented to Immigration Minister Lena Metlege Diab, Minister of Public Safety Gary Anandasangaree, and Minister of Government Transformation, Public Works, and Procurement Joël Lightbound. Law, Technology, and Accountability: Reimagining Canadian Immigration for the 21st Century makes 100 recommendations to modernize Canada's immigration framework, which came into force in 2001. Read the full article by Holly Lake with CBA National.
CBABC Asks BC Supreme Court to Restore Default
Case Management of Class Actions
Returning to old process will reduce delays, save judicial resources, association branch says
The Canadian Bar Association's BC branch (CBABC) made a submission requesting that the Supreme Court of British Columbia reinstate the default case management of class action proceedings, given the impact of the 2023 amendments to three civil practice directions. These practice directions pertain to class proceedings (PD 4), the judicial management and early assessment of a trial judge or hearing judge in civil and family proceedings (PD 5), and the Canadian judicial protocol for managing multi-jurisdictional class actions and providing class action notices (PD 55). Read the full article by Bernise Carolino with Canadian Lawyer.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Assistance to Shelter Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, sections 141 to 143 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Assistance to Shelter Regulation (291/2009) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
Balanced Budget and Ministerial Accountability Act | May 29/25 | by 2025 Bill 5, c. 10, section 1 only (in force by Royal Assent), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2025 |
Designated Policing and Law Enforcement Units Complaints Regulation (230/2022) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
June 1/25 | by Reg 71/2025 | |
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 154 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Gunshot and Stab Wound Disclosure Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 155 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Hotel Guest Registration Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 156 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Justice Administration Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 157 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Lobbyists Transparency Act | May 27/25 | by 2024 Bill 9, c. 10, sections 1 to 8 only (in force by Reg 55/2025), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2024 |
Missing Persons Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, sections 161, 162 and 174 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Missing Persons Regulation (111/2015) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
Police Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, sections 2, 4, 10, 12 to 14, 16, 18, 19, 22, 24 to 27, 42, 44, 46, 47, 51, 52, 55, 58, 66, 67, 75, 81, 84, 86, 90, 114, 122 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Police (Disposal of Property) Regulation (87/91) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
Police Oath/Solemn Affirmation Regulation (136/2002) | May 20/25 | by Reg 67/2025 |
Police Officer Commissions Regulation (78/2015) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
Police (Uniforms) Regulation (564/76) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
Prescribed Police Forces Regulation (70/99) | REPEALED May 1/25 |
by Reg 48/2025 |
Public Interest Disclosure Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, sections 167 and 168 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority Police Service Operations Regulation (484/2004) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
Special Provincial Constable Complaints and Discipline Regulation (206/98) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
Stl'atl'imx Tribal Police Service Complaints and Operations Regulation (385/99) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
Witness Security Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, sections 171 to 173 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Dangerous Goods Marks on a Small Means of Containment
This document does not change, create, amend or suggest deviations to the Transportation of Dangerous Goods Regulations (TDG Regulations).
This document is an overview of the requirements for using dangerous goods marks, which identify dangerous goods. It is for anyone who imports, offers for transport, handles or transports dangerous goods in small means of containment.
From: Transport Canada.
BC Court of Appeal Sees Error in Finding of Failure to
Mitigate Symptoms After Car Accident
The British Columbia Court of Appeal partly allowed an appeal upon agreeing with an injured man's argument that a judge erred by decreasing his non-pecuniary damages on the ground that he failed to mitigate his psychological injuries.
The case of McPhail v. Ross, 2025 BCCA 139, arose from a motor vehicle accident in Vancouver in December 2012. The appellant was driving on West 4th Avenue when the respondent ran a stop sign, pulled out from a side street, and drove into the appellant's path. Though the appellant swerved, the front and right side of his vehicle struck the respondent's car. Read the full article by Bernise Carolino in the Canadian Lawyer magazine.
Plan to Help Stop Overpass Strikes in
Metro Vancouver Unveiled
A large working group, including TransLink, is trying to fix a major problem on Metro Vancouver roads – trucks hitting overpasses and downing trolley wires.
TransLink is outlining new standards for heavy trucks on Friday, and it hopes the new measures will reduce the overall number of strikes.
The plan, which is currently in the process of being fully adopted by local cities, includes:
Dave Earle, president and CEO of the BC Trucking Association, explains what the changes actually mean for the industry. Read the CityNews article.
Requirements Regarding Variable Identification
Plates for Modified Tank Cars
This advisory serves as a reminder to industry stakeholders of their responsibilities regarding the installation of a variable identification plate following a modification to a tank car. This includes, but is not limited to, the retrofit and re-stenciling of Class 111 tank cars (legacy or enhanced) to specification 117R.
From: Transport Canada.
BC Court of Appeal Confirms Privacy Act Damages
May Be Awarded Without Proof of Loss
The British Columbia Court of Appeal recently confirmed an aggregate damages award under the Privacy Act of $15,000 per class member, without proof of individualized harm. The decision Insurance Corporation of British Columbia v. Ari, 2025 BCCA 131 establishes that in actions for breaches of privacy, courts may award more than nominal damages even where the plaintiff does not prove they suffered any harm beyond the privacy breach itself.
An employee of the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (ICBC) intentionally accessed the private information of 78 ICBC policy holders, and sold the information of at least 45 policy holders to criminals. Some of these policy holders were later targeted in arson and shooting attacks.
The affected policy holders sued ICBC in a class action. After ICBC was found liable for its employee's wrongful acts, the court held a summary trial to determine aggregate damages for the class as a whole. The plaintiffs did not adduce evidence relating to particular harms experienced by individual class members: the issue was what damages were appropriate for the breach of privacy itself. Read the full article by Connor Bildfell, Nico Rullmann and Kyra McGovern with McCarthy Tétrault.
CVSE Bulletins & Notices
The following documents were posted recently by CVSE:
For more information on these and other items, visit the CVSE website.
Passenger Transportation Board Bulletins
The following updates were recently published by the BC Passenger Transportation Board:
Applications Received
Application Decisions
Visit the Passenger Transportation Board website for more information.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Commercial Transport Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, sections 144 and 145 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Emergency Vehicle Driving Regulation (133/98) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
Enhanced Accident Benefits Regulation (59/2021) | May 1/25 | by Reg 54/2025 |
Income Replacement and Retirement Benefits and Benefits for Students and Minors Regulation (60/2021) | May 1/25 | by Reg 54/2025 |
Insurance (Vehicle) Regulation (447/83) | May 1/25 | by Reg 54/2025 |
Minor Injury Regulation (234/2018) | May 1/25 | by Reg 54/2025 |
Motor Vehicle Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 174 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Motor Vehicle Act Regulations (26/58) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
Offence Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, sections 163 and 165 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Passenger Transportation Regulation (266/2004) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
Permanent Impairment Regulation (61/2021) | May 1/25 | by Reg 54/2025 |
Transportation Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 176 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Violation Ticket Administration and Fines Regulation (89/97) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
Technical Safety BC Warns Cost-cutting
Is Jeopardizing Safety
Technical Safety BC is warning growing efforts to save money are putting workers and the public at increased risk,
as outlined in its 2024 State of Safety report. The report highlights a disturbing trend: organizations and individuals opting for short-term
savings at the expense of long-term safety – a practice president and lead executive officer Phil Gothe calls a "false economy" or the "grey
market." "We are seeing it in folks not hiring licensed contractors. They're not working with people who have all the right qualifications," says
Gothe. "That's resulting in incidents like carbon monoxide exposure, electrical shocks, or fires." Read the full Canadian Occupational Safety
article.
BOD Decision: Activity-related Soft Tissue
Disorders (ASTDs) of the Limbs
from WorkSafeBC:
On
April 25, 2025, WorkSafeBC's Board of Directors approved changes
to policy to provide greater clarity and to consolidate guidance on the
issue of whether the ASTD is due to the nature of the worker's
employment, for ASTDs adjudicated as an occupational disease. The
proposed amendments also clarify the relationship between the
legislation's requirement that the ASTD is due to the nature of the
worker's employment, and the separate requirement that the ASTD be
recognized as an occupational disease. These amendments are informed by
recommendations #36 and #37 in Paul Petrie's Restoring the Balance: A Worker-Centred Approach to Workers' Compensation Policy, as well as recommendations regarding work causation for ASTDs from Janet Patterson's New Directions: Report of the WCB Review 2019.
The amended policies apply to all decisions, including appellate decisions, made on or after July 14, 2025. You can also review the
complete Resolution.
BC Employer Fined for Gas Leak
British
Columbia employer Bay Hill Contracting Ltd. has been fined $98,695.31
following a gas leak at one of its worksites. The incident occurred in
Surrey, where the firm's excavator struck and damaged an underground gas
line, resulting in a leak. WorkSafeBC inspected the site after the
incident and determined that the firm had not reviewed the BC 1 Call
documentation. "Important infrastructure, including telecommunication
cables, electricity wires, natural gas lines, water mains and sewer lines, are often buried underground," according to the BC government. "By clicking or calling BC 1 Call before beginning any excavation
project, British Columbians can ensure safety and prevent possible interruption of services." Read the full Canadian Occupational Safety
article, by Jim Wilson.
WorkSafeBC 'Considering Appropriate Enforcement Action'
against BC Wildfire Service
WorkSafeBC is "now considering appropriate enforcement action"
against the BC Wildfire Service in relation to a 2023 planned burn operation in British Columbia. The operation by the wildfire service could have killed or injured multiple firefighters during
an operation in the 2023 fire season, according to a recent report.
During the burn in the Shuswap region on Aug. 17 that year, a team of
Brazilian firefighters became
trapped by "extreme fire behaviour" following a controlled burn operation conducted by the BC Wildfire Service, CBC noted, citing a
report from WorkSafeBC. Read the full article by Jim Wilson, with Canadian Occupational Safety.
Emergency Planning for Hazardous Substances
Amendments to Part 5 of the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation
came into effect on February 3, 2025. These amendments provide clarity
and specify what emergency plans must include. "Emergencies can happen
suddenly and without warning," says Diana
Janke, senior prevention advisor. "The more prepared you are for them,
the better you'll be able to respond in a way that reduces the chance of
injury."
Read the full article by Steven Gilstead, published in Forest Safe Magazine, June 2025.What it means for employers
BC's employers are already required to develop response plans for emergencies involving hazardous substances. The amendments now require them to:
- Prepare a written emergency response plan that is appropriate to the hazards of the workplace and clarifies roles and responsibilities during an emergency.
- Conduct training and drills annually or when a plan is revised.
- Engage staff in the emergency response plan process.
OHS Policies/Guidelines – Updates
Guidelines – Occupational Health and Safety Regulation
May 8, 2025
Visit the WorkSafeBC website to explore this and previous updates.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Gas Safety Regulation (103/2004) | May 1/25 | by Reg 51/2025 |
Safety Standards Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 169 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
No Signature, No Sale: The Emoji that
Couldn't Seal the Deal
In Ross v. Garvey, 2025 BCSC 705,
the British Columbia Supreme Court was asked to determine whether a thumbs-up emoji was a valid electronic signature to a contract. This
case follows closely on the heels of the "emoji case" South West Terminal Ltd. v. Achter Land, 2023 SKKB 116, in which in Saskatchewan courts found that a contract was "signed" using a thumbs-up emoji via text message (read our article discussing Achter Land here).
Background
The plaintiff, Daniel Ross, is a real estate developer and licensed realtor. He alleged that he had entered into a binding agreement to purchase a residential property from the defendants, brothers Kyle and Matthew Garvey. The Garveys had listed the property privately and were communicating with Ross via text and email. Ross emailed the Garveys a signed formal offer using a standard real estate contract, which the Garveys initially rejected. Days later, Kyle Garvey emailed Ross a modified version of Ross's offer detailing changes to the price, deposit, and brokerage fees. Although Kyle Garvey referred to this as a "counteroffer" in the email and attached a marked-up version of the standard contract sent by Ross, the Garveys did not sign it.
Read the full article by Jake Cabott and Matthew G. Swanson with Borden Ladner Gervais LLP.
Commercially Reasonable and Diligent Efforts at the Earliest
Possible Date: A Novel Contract Clause Unpacked
The recent case of Epix Developments Ltd. v. Bonnis Development Union Street Limited Partnership (Epix)
addressed the interpretation of a novel compound contractual clause following the termination of an agreement due to a repudiatory breach in
a real property transaction.
Background
The plaintiffs, Epix Developments Ltd. and Epix Main Street Limited Partnership (Plaintiff), and the defendant, Bonnis Development Union Street Limited (Defendant) entered into two agreements wherein the Plaintiff sought to purchase from the Defendant three adjacent lots located in Vancouver's Chinatown with significant history and development potential (Property).
Read the full article by Greg Umbach with Blakes.
Tenant Due Diligence Essentials in British Columbia
Corporate
and property searches are an essential starting point for tenant due diligence when negotiating a commercial lease. Due diligence
search results can provide tenants with a clearer picture of the property, the parties involved, potential restrictions on the land and
the liabilities that may arise. I had the privilege of co-chairing a roundtable on the topic of due diligence for tenants at
the recent ICSC+Canadian Law conference. We discussed the importance of tailoring due diligence searches to those most applicable to the asset
class of the property, the surrounding area and any other impacts to the intended use and occupation of the premises. Tenants should ask the
following questions regarding the condition of the property:
Here are the key steps we discussed and how they can help tenants enter into stronger leases and avoid uncertain risks. Read the full article by Michelle F. Yung with Bennett Jones LLP.
Recent Cases Address Application of BC Foreign Buyers Tax
The BC Court of Appeal and the BC Supreme Court have issued two recent
judgments regarding the application of the additional property transfer
tax ("ATT"), commonly called the BC foreign buyers tax, imposed under
the Property Transfer Tax Act, RSBC 1996, c 378 (the "PTTA").
In British Columbia v. 1084204 B.C. Ltd., 2025 BCCA 110,
the Court found that property transfer taxes, including the ATT, are
payable by the person to whom legal title is transferred, even if that
person is acting as an agent.
In Chuang v. British Columbia, 2024 BCSC 2422,
the Court found that, where a transfer of property is subject to ATT
due to a recipient of the transfer being a "taxable trustee", the fair
market value ("FMV") of the entire property is used to calculate the ATT
payable on the transfer, regardless of whether the property is
beneficially owned by multiple owners (including Canadian citizens or
permanent residents). Read the full article by Kurt Haunsperger with Thorsteinssons LLP.
Do You Know Your Voting Rights?
Dear Tony:
I am a commercial property owner of a strata lot in a mixed-use development. Our strata corporation recently defeated a special levy to replace our hot and cold domestic water where each unit would be paying approximately $25,000 depending on the size of the unit. Every owner registered for the meeting and received a voting card for each strata lot they represented issued by the management company and some voters had multiple cards representing residential proxies of other units. As the owner of the largest property, I feel it is unfair I have only one vote, pay the largest amount, and a proxy holder can come into the room with 10 proxies and control the decision by 2 votes, forcing a secret ballot. How do we stop this? The building has constant water leaks, claims and damages. – Florence C.
Dear Florence:
A strata corporation cannot limit or restrict the number of proxies a person holds. The bylaws of each strata determine the methods of voting and in your case, in-person meetings can be controlled by one person requesting a secret ballot. There is no advanced voting and the instructions on the proxy are for the proxy holder, not the strata manager or chairperson to record the votes. The proxy holder must vote when the vote is called and only that person will know how the votes are exercised. The chairperson of the meeting must be able to identify the votes are being cast by an eligible voter.
Read the full article by Tony Gioventu on Condo Smarts, published by CHOA.
Prompt Payment Legislation Advancing for BC Construction
In response to widespread concerns about delayed payments to
contractors and subcontractors on construction projects, several jurisdictions—including Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario,
Quebec, and the federal government (for federal projects)—have enacted prompt payment legislation. Other provinces are considering similar
measures. In British Columbia, Bill M-233 (Prompt Payment (Builders Lien) Act, 2019) was introduced in May 2019 but did not pass into law. However, in
April 2025, the Attorney General directed Ministry staff to prepare a proposal for prompt payment legislation for the government's
consideration. As a result, it now appears likely that BC will introduce prompt payment legislation, and soon. Read the full article by Mark Danielson with Pushor Mitchell LLP.
Bare Lots and the Speculation and Vacancy Tax
This is the next in a series of articles Pushor Mitchell is producing
on the Speculation and Vacancy Tax (the "Spec Tax"), aimed at helping property owners understand how the tax affects them. Our last article
addressed the expansion of the Spec Tax to new communities in 2025 and the increased Spec Tax rate for Canadian citizens starting in 2026. This
article discusses an exemption relevant to property owners unexpectedly charged Spec Tax on bare lots in communities like Peachland, Penticton,
and Lake Country. Many British Columbians have purchased bare lots in Okanagan communities, with plans to build retirement homes or relocate for the
Okanagan lifestyle, but have not yet built on their land. When purchased, these properties were outside the reach of the Spec Tax.
However, as the tax has expanded, owners are now required to file annual declarations and, in many cases, pay significant tax bills—even without
a completed residence or speculative intent. Read the full article by Kyle Ramsey with Pushor Mitchell LLP.
Default Payments
Dear Tony:
I received a notice from my management company that my strata fees were in arrears and a lien would be filed if I did not pay the balance owing. Our strata have authorized direct payments each month and I checked my statements and all payments have been withdrawn with no issues. The management company advised that our payment authorizations include fines for penalties and damages, so they applied my strata fees to fines without providing notice. They advise the form authorizes them to apply funds to any outstanding amounts owing. The strata council advised that we had an unauthorized alteration in our unit and they have been imposing fines of $200 / week for the last 3 months. We purchased our unit in 2023 and nothing has been changed and we are unaware of any alterations. This is really unfair without any opportunity to dispute these claims. – JL Marks, Abbotsford
Dear JL:
A strata corporation cannot divert funds that were scheduled and intended for the payment of strata fees or designated for special levies to resolve claims of penalties or damages. These even include the late payment of strata fees. While the bank approval form may have included the ability to charge fines or damages, it does not replace your authorization for strata fees or override the requirements of the Strata Property Act.
Read the full article by Tony Gioventu on Condo Smarts, published by CHOA.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Land Act | May 1/25 | by 2024 Bill 17, c. 16, section 176 only (in force by Reg 48/2025), Police Amendment Act, 2024 |
Residential Tenancy Regulation (477/2003) | May 1/25 | by Reg 48/2025 |
Conflict of Interest in Estate Administration:
What Virdi Estate (Re) Teaches Executors
When family dynamics and estate administration collide, the consequences can be both emotionally and legally complex. In Virdi Estate (Re), 2025 BCSC 689, the Supreme Court of British Columbia recently considered whether a son could act as executor while asserting a significant financial claim against his late father's estate.
The decision sheds light on how courts approach conflicts of interest in estate litigation – and offers valuable lessons for estate planners, litigators, and financial advisors alike. This case also serves as a cautionary tale on the importance of selecting truly impartial executors, especially when family members are also potential creditors.
The Testator passed away in July 2023, leaving behind a 1995 Will naming one of his four children as alternate executor (the "Executor"). The Estate, worth approximately $1.56 million, included a family home and financial assets. Following the Testator's death, the Executor presented a more recent Will from 2019, under which he would have been the sole beneficiary. His siblings challenged the validity of the document, alleging it was fraudulent, which led the Executor to revert to probating the earlier 1995 Will. Read the full article by Alexander Swabuk with Miller Thomson LLP.
Testamentary Capacity: Principles and Practice
In the majority of cases, determining whether a prospective client has testamentary capacity is not as simple as discerning between midnight and noon; rather, it is like determining the precise moment at which twilight turns to dark. This article considers some of the issues on point.
Testamentary capacity: Test and issues
Testamentary capacity is the capacity to make a valid will or other testamentary disposition and is simple: does the testator have the capacity to understand (i) the nature of the act of making a will and its effects; (ii) the extent of the property that is being bequeathed; (iii) the possible claims that could be made in respect of the testator's property.
Read the full article by Esther Mendelsohn with Law360 Canada.
Re Estate of Church: A Lesson in
Will-Making for Snowbirds
What happens when someone makes a will in another jurisdiction which purports to revoke all former wills? Would such a revocation be binding on a validly made will in BC? Can the court rectify the foreign will so as not to apply to assets in BC? The recent decision of the BC Supreme Court in Re Estate of Church, 2024 BCSC 2490, provide some guidance on these questions.
Mr. Church (the Deceased) had prepared a will in 2007 in British Columbia with the assistance of his lawyer (the BC Will). The three beneficiaries under the BC Will were: the Deceased's spouse, daughter and son.
Prior to his passing, the Deceased and his spouse were snowbirds who had purchased a property in California. In order to deal with his assets in California, the Deceased created a living trust in that jurisdiction (the California Trust). The Deceased's two children were the beneficiaries of the California Trust. Read the full article by Louise McLeod, Scott Boucher and Samantha Andison with Lawson Lundell.
An (Es)cheat Sheet: When the Government
Inherits a Deceased's Estate
Escheat occurs when the assets of an estate pass to the provincial government because a person has died without a Will and without any surviving:
Any relative who is more than four degrees of relationship to the deceased is deemed to have predeceased the deceased. When property escheats, it is transferred to the Attorney General who takes possession in the name of the provincial government. Read the full article by Catherine Bunio and Kiara Gibbons with Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
There were no amendments this month. |