Company and Finance News:

Lobbying and Election Finance Reform:
Roundup of Recent Developments
British Columbia, the Northwest Territories and Ontario have recently introduced significant changes to their respective lobbying and election finance regimes; the Yukon has introduced a new lobbying regime, and Prince Edward Island's lobbying regime takes effect in 2019.

British Columbia: Proposed Amendments
to the Lobbying Regime
Bill 54, Lobbyists Registration Amendment Act, 2018 (BC Bill) received royal assent on November 27, 2018. Most provisions of the BC Bill have not yet been proclaimed in force, but it will amend various sections of the Lobbyists Registration Act.

Definitions
The BC Bill proposes to expand the definition of "former public office holder" to also include any individual, other than administrative support staff, formerly employed in a current or former office of a current member of the executive council. The BC Bill also proposes to revise the definition of "in-house lobbyist" in a significant way. Under the proposed definition, the 100-hour threshold for an in-house lobbyist would be removed and replaced with various qualifiers as to which individuals are not in-house lobbyists, including if:

(a)	The individual is an employee, director or officer of an organization that has fewer than six employees
(b)	The lobbying by the individual, either alone or together with other individuals in the organization, on behalf of the organization or an affiliate of the organization,
	(i)	Totals fewer than 50 hours in the preceding 12-month period, or
	(ii)	Meets the prescribed criteria,
	unless the primary purpose of the organization is to:
	(i)	Represent the interests of its members, or
	(ii)	Promote or oppose issues, and the lobbying by the individual is for that purpose.

Read the full article by Alexis Levine, Nicole McDonald and Charlotte Knutson (Student-at-Law) with Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP. 

Partnership Act Updated
Effective December 14, Amendments made to the Partnership Act by the Finance Statutes Amendment Act, 2012 provide for the expansion of online filing for partnerships and establish consistency in the fees set out under the Act.

BC Securities – Policies & Instruments
The following policies and instruments were published on the BCSC website in the month of December:

• BC Notice 2018/09 – Fee Changes
• BC Notice 2018/08 – Notice of Amendments to National Instrument 41-101 General Prospectus Requirements
• 23-323 – CSA Staff Notice and Request for Comment 23-323 Trading Fee Rebate Pilot Study
• CSA Staff Notice 13-315 (Revised) – Securities Regulatory Authority Closed Dates 2018

For more information visit the BC Securities website.

Energy and Mines News:

British Columbia Unveils New Clean Energy Plan
On December 5, 2018, the B.C. government unveiled a new clean energy plan, CleanBC, which outlines the government's strategy to achieve 75% of the Province's 2030 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions target (how the remaining 25% will be achieved remains to be determined). The full report can be read here. The highlights report can be read here.

What's In the Plan?
The plan outlines a number of initiatives that are intended to "clean" or "green" the transportation, construction, waste and industrial sectors of the BC economy, primarily by reducing the use of fossil fuels and increasing the use of electricity in these sectors. Key initiatives planned for the industrial sector of the BC economy include:

• Working with natural gas providers to put in place a minimum requirement for 15 per cent renewable content in natural gas by 2030.

Read the full article by Erika Lambert-Shirzad with Borden Ladner Gervais LLP. 

Regulator Schedules Hearings for BC LNG
Natural Gas Pipeline Challenge
The National Energy Board is scheduling hearings over the next three months to consider a jurisdictional challenge of the approval of a pipeline needed to supply natural gas to the recently sanctioned $40-billion LNG Canada project. But planning for construction to begin early next year will continue based on the $6.2-billion Coastal GasLink Pipeline's provincial approvals and permits, said a spokeswoman for the project. The NEB hearings will consider only the question of whether the British Columbia Oil and Gas Commission had jurisdiction to issue approvals for the project, the NEB says. If it decides the project should be under federal jurisdiction, the regulator says the proponent will have to make a formal NEB application and undergo a separate process to win federal approval. "If the NEB decides Coastal GasLink is to be federally regulated, then the project believes the NEB will need to address transition from provincial to federal jurisdiction," pipeline spokeswoman Jacquelynn Benson said. Read the full article in The Vancouver Sun. 

New Federal Timelines for Energy Project Approvals
The federal government has proposed controversial new rules to govern approvals for projects, including many Major Energy Projects. The pace and direction of future development of Canada's energy sector could lie in the balance.

• Bill C-69 proposes a new 5-stage Impact Assessment process that could easily take more than 5 years to complete.
• The federal proposals are designed to encourage the regulatory phases of the Impact Assessment process to be completed within approximately 2 ½ years – or roughly 30 months.
• Other portions of the process, which are in the hands of project proponents, are expected to be completed within a further 3 years – or roughly 36 months.
• Whether these timelines will actually work or not will likely depend on the commitment of the federal government to respect and apply the legislated timelines rather than to suspend or extend them.

Read the full article by Jonathan Drance, Glenn Cameron and Rachel V. Hutton of Stikeman Elliott.

Family and Children News:

Concerns Mount as BC Paralegals Inch
toward Practising Family Law
Paralegals aren't lawyers – but soon, they might be able to practise in B.C. courtrooms. The province has pushed through legislation to create "licensed paralegals" – a band of legal service providers that need not hold a law degree, and can provide cheaper services. The bill was introduced following years of campaigning from the Law Society of B.C. (LSBC) in hopes of filling gaps in legal representation – in particular, low- to moderate-income British Columbians who cannot afford legal representation. The LSBC is angling for those workers to practise family law – the branch that focuses on issues like divorce settlements and includes division of assets and custody battles. The society has the final say on granting the authority to license the paralegals. The legislation paves the way for the LSBC to do so. But while the legislation might be seen as a victory for those looking to improve access to justice, a group of lawyers are warning that it could have the opposite effect. Read the full article on the CBC News website.

Designing Rules of Procedure for the
Arbitration of Family Law Disputes
In Canada, the available sets of arbitration rules are designed for corporate-commercial disputes and general civil disputes. None are designed for family law disputes, which is especially problematic in jurisdictions like British Columbia, where the Arbitration Act specifies the rules that will be used absent the parties' agreement to the contrary. Those rules, by the way, are the domestic rules of the BC International Commercial Arbitration Centre, which are hardly ideal for family law disputes and require hefty payments to the Centre. As a result, in many jurisdictions lawyers taking a case to arbitration simply adopt the local rules of court. This makes sense, as anyone who litigates will be intimately familiar with those rules, and some jurisdictions, again like British Columbia, have rules of court written just for family law disputes. However, it's not necessarily the best solution, as adopting the rules of court by default, or by reflex, robs parties of one of the key benefits of arbitration: the ability to shape and customize the arbitration process to suit their needs, their dispute and their finances. Read the full article by John Paul Boyd published on SLAW. 

Changes to Family Maintenance Enforcement Act
Effective January 1, 2019, changes made to the Family Maintenance Enforcement Act no longer require the entirety of a family law order or agreement to be filed in the land title office as security for the payment of child or spousal support. Instead, a "notice of maintenance order" containing only the information needed to identify the order or agreement is required for filing purposes.

Pill Press Regulations Tackle Manufacturing of Illicit Drugs
New legislation is now in place to support B.C.'s actions to prevent the illegal production of illicit opioids, bolstering police efforts to disrupt the supply chain and helping to get counterfeit pills off the streets. The Pill Press and Related Equipment Control Act and the associated Pill Press and Related Equipment Control Regulation will come into force on Jan. 15, 2019. The act is comprehensive legislation that will limit the ownership, possession and use of manufacturing equipment for pills and capsules to those with a legitimate business or professional purpose. The regulation sets out the information that authorized owners, including registered sellers, must provide in events such as the acquisition, sale, loss or theft of controlled equipment and will update a database of equipment possessed by legitimate owners and businesses. This will enable tracing and random inspections. Read the government news release. 

Class Action Certified vs. Ontario in Alleged Charter
Breach against Developmentally Disabled
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has certified a class action for plaintiffs pushed "to the brink of disaster" by long wait lists for Ministry of Community and Social Services (MCSS) support for developmentally disabled persons over 18 years old. The certification of the s. 7 Charter claim, lawyers said, is "fairly novel." In Leroux v. Ontario 2018 ONSC 6452, the court heard that the plaintiff, Marc Leroux, brought the class action against the Province of Ontario as the litigation guardian for his 20-year-old daughter Briana, who is developmentally disabled. According to court documents, released Dec. 14, Briana was diagnosed with a brain disorder when she was 2 years old and remains non-verbal. She will be disabled for the rest of her life and requires constant care. Leroux relies on financial support and social services supplied by the provincial government through the Ministry, but long wait lists have left him without aid for over a year. "According to the material that is before the court, the experience of parents and families in dealing with the MCSS on behalf of disabled loved ones has ‘pushed [them] to the brink of disaster,' " wrote Justice Edward Belobaba on the motion for certification at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Justice Belobaba noted that families run into issues with the MCSS after the developmentally disabled individual has been assessed and approved for services, writing "the evidence is that the families are then ‘are dropped off a cliff' and nothing happens – for a very long time." Read the full article by Amanda Jerome on The Lawyer's Daily. 

New Public Health Regulation
On January 1, 2019, the Reporting Information Affecting Public Health Regulation came into effect. The Regulation replaces the Health Act Communicable Disease Regulation and the Public Health Act Transitional Regulation and includes a list of prescribed infectious agents responsible for reportable communicable diseases. Health officials must report infected persons to a medical health officer in the form and manner required by the medical health officer. In addition, those in charge of an institution or workplace have a duty to report the contact information of any person who may have been exposed to an infected person as advised by a medical health officer.

Background

In March 2017 Arpac Storage Systems Corporation (Arpac) gave its 70-year-old occupational health and safety (OHS) manager one year's working notice that his employment would be terminated. The OHS manager had almost 23 years of service and no disciplinary record. However, his relationship with Arpac had deteriorated because his supervisor no longer saw him as an asset. The OHS manager was diagnosed with reactive depression after receiving notice of termination. He gave Arpac a doctor's note stating that he was not fit to attend work. While he was off work, the OHS manager altered a spreadsheet to make it inaccurate and deleted hundreds of business and personal emails from his work e-mail account.

Local Government News:

Rental Housing Report and Homeless Counts
The Province last week issued two key reports relating to housing and homelessness: the 2018 Report on Homeless Counts in BC finding a minimum of 7,655 homeless people in BC; and the final report of the Rental Housing Task Force making 23 recommendations on wide ranging aspects of the rental housing framework.

2018 Report on Homeless Counts
The Ministry of Social Development and Poverty Reduction released the 2018 Report on Homeless Counts, summarizing findings from 24 communities covering more than 85% of the province's population over the past 2 years. The report found that there are at least 7,655 homeless people across BC.

Read the UBCM article. 

The Latest Chapter in the Development of "Occupation" Law
In two recent decisions, Saanich (District) v Brett, 2018 BCSC 1648 ("Saanich") and Nanaimo (City) v Courtoreille, 2018 BCSC 1629 ("Nanaimo"), the BC Supreme Court considered local government applications to the Court for pre-trial injunctions to terminate unauthorized homeless encampments. Generally, these cases represent examples of the Court undertaking a balancing of the homeless population's need for shelter and against the nature of these encampments within the context of the duties and authority of public authorities to reasonably manage lands falling within their jurisdiction. In Saanich, the Court granted an application for an interlocutory injunction to close the encampment and on certain conditions, which included bringing a full trial or final hearing on the District's case within six months. The approximately 107 occupants of the encampment were ordered to evacuate the park until it was restored to a safe state and, once the premises were restored, to only occupy it in accordance with Saanich's zoning bylaws. Similarly, in Nanaimo, the Court ordered an interlocutory injunction to vacate an encampment located on city-owned and privately-leased property. Similar to Saanich, the Nanaimo encampment was composed of approximately 115 tents and occupation of the premises was throughout the day and night. Read the full article by Jeff Locke, Kerri Crawford and Jessica Bond of Stewart McDannold Stuart.

A Blunt End to Non-compliant Cannabis
Dispensaries in Vancouver
In a decisive statement on the scope of municipal power to regulate cannabis dispensaries, Chief Justice Hinkson of the BC Supreme Court granted a statutory injunction sought by the City of Vancouver. In Vancouver (City) v Karuna Health Foundation, 2018 BCSC 2221, the City brought a petition against several cannabis dispensaries, arguing that the dispensaries were carrying on business contrary to the City's framework for the regulation of medical cannabis retail uses under its business licence bylaw. Read the full article by Nick Falzon of Young Anderson.

Miscellaneous News:

BC AG wants Review of how Legal Aid is Delivered
After years of "dismal" funding, British Columbia Attorney General David Eby says his government plans to improve legal aid services, while a recent report from Lawyers Rights Watch Canada says chronic underfunding has caused Canada to fall short of its international human rights obligations. In a submission to the Legal Aid Services Review of BC, the LRWC told the BC government on Nov. 22 that its "inadequate" legal aid system compromises the legitimacy of the province's justice system. The report highlights how BC has been singled out in the frequent criticism aimed at Canada's legal system by United Nations treaty monitoring bodies who say lack of legal aid funding means Canadians are not truly equal under the law. Eby's NDP government has been in power for 17 months and he places the blame on previous governments and says his plan is to make investments in legal aid, including the biggest increase in funding in 16 years. Read the full article in the Canadian Lawyer magazine. 

Civil Resolution Tribunal Act Amendments
Amendments to the Civil Resolution Tribunal Act made by 2018 Bill 22, Civil Resolution Tribunal Amendment Act, 2018, and 2018 Bill 57, Attorney General Statutes Amendment Act, 2018 came into force on January 1, 2019. These changes improve the process in place since the Civil Resolution Tribunal began, by clarifying the time limits for filing matters in court and in the tribunal, prohibiting a party who defaults in the tribunal from obtaining a new trial in provincial court, and setting time limits for the application of judicial review. Further changes will come into force on April 1, 2019, which will grant the tribunal jurisdiction over motor vehicle accident disputes, including determinations whether an injury is a minor injury, disputes about accident benefits, and disputes about damages and fault up to $50,000.

CVSE Bulletins & Notices
The following notices have been posted in December by CVSE:

• Circular 06-17 – Deadline for Planned Trailer Axle Weight Reductions Extended to December 31, 2020
• Circular 07-17 – Temporary Increase to Steer Axle Weights for Specified Pre-Approved Logging Truck Configurations to December 31, 2019
• CT Notice 05-18 – Effective January 15, 2019, carriers must have a signed Form CVSE1053 on file with the Provincial Permit Centre before obtaining extraordinary load permits that have bridge crossing conditions as part of their approval.
• Circular 03-18 – Introduction of the Project Cargo Corridor Pilot

For more information on these and other items, visit the CVSE website.

WorkSafeBC Alert:
Consultation on the 2019–2021 Policy Workplans
The Policy, Regulation and Research Division has prepared draft 2019–2021 workplans for stakeholder review and comment. These workplans will encompass policy priorities relating to compensation, occupational disease, assessments, and occupational health and safety. Stakeholders are invited to review the discussion paper and proposed workplans, and to provide feedback by February 4, 2019. The discussion paper, proposed workplans, and information on providing feedback can be accessed on worksafebc.com.

Article 2 – Injured Worker Series:
Settlement of WorkSafeBC Claims
We are frequently asked about "settling with the Board". Our response is that you cannot settle with WorkSafeBC ("the Board"). The basic scheme of compensation for injured workers is that the Board adjudicates all claims. In other words, it makes decisions starting with whether the claim will be accepted. If it is accepted a number of other decisions will be made concerning wage loss, medical care, rehabilitation, and pension benefits. Each of these decisions in turn are based on numerous other decisions. For example, in determining wage loss benefits the Board will decide when the benefits commence, how much they will be initially and in the long term, and when they will terminate. By the time a worker receives his first wage loss cheque several decisions may have been made by the Board. The Board does not negotiate before making its decisions. It has no legal right to do so. It is required to, and does, consider information available to it from the worker, doctors, the employer, and other witnesses in making its decisions. Read the full article by Alfred Kempf of Pushor Mitchell LLP.

WorkSafeBC Launches New Online Notice of
Project Submission Process
To address employer feedback and aging technology, WorkSafeBC has upgraded its Notice of Project (NOP) online submission process and it will be accessible to all employers before the end of this year (2018). While there will be a grace period for employers to use the old forms, at some point in the future the old Notice of Project form will be retired. In the past, there was just one form for the different types of notices of project required by regulation; the form timed-out after 30 minutes; and it was harder to use. The new forms are now customized for each of the six required notices – two of which are needed for certain forestry projects and aircraft operations (forestry). The other four new forms are for construction, diving, underground workings, and asbestos, lead or other similar exposure work activity. The Occupational Health and Safety Regulation requires that WorkSafeBC be notified of certain types of projects before they begin. Read the full article in the December issue of Forest Safety News.

Lack Of Workers' Comp Can Have Serious
Consequences For Employers
Some business owners in British Columbia may not be pleased that just about every employer must register for and pay insurance premiums to protect injured workers. In BC, even property owners who build their own residences or those who hire casual workers as regular gardeners, domestic workers, nannies and cleaners must register with WorkSafe BC. While it might seem like an unnecessary expense, some argue that employers can see the value of these payments if they consider that the absence of workers' compensation insurance could require their businesses to be responsible for payment of medical fees that follow on-the-job injuries and rehabilitation. Another compelling argument for workers' compensation exists in the fact that an incident that injures several workers can burden the business with astronomical expenses that might compromise profits. Employees who are covered by WorkSafeBC are, except for cases of gross negligence by the employer, generally prohibited from filing personal injury lawsuits against their employers in exchange for the coverage they enjoy at no cost regardless of negligence or fault. Read the full article on the Overholt Law blog.

BC's New Pre-Sale Assignment Register and REDMA
Fee Changes: What Developers Must Know
Effective January 1, 2019, developers in British Columbia will be subject to new information collection, reporting and document retention requirements in connection with assignments of purchase agreements in qualifying developments. The new requirements will apply to any five (5) or more strata lots in a stratified building in British Columbia that are marketed for sale or for lease with a term longer than three (3) years (each, a "Strata Development"). These changes became law by the passing of Bill 25 – Real Estate Development Marketing Amendment Act (2018) and regulations amending the Real Estate Development Marketing Act (British Columbia) ("REDMA") and the Real Estate Development Marketing Regulation, and the issuance of REDMA Policy Statement 16. Read the full article by Chad Travis and May Au of Lawson Lundell LLP.

New Speculation and Vacancy Tax Regulation
The new Speculation and Vacancy Tax Regulation was brought into force December 10. This regulation describes the type of land and improvements that are not considered residential property under the Act, including rental property, and property that includes four or more apartments. Parcels of land and improvements related to exempt property are also addressed. It also sets out the calculation of fair market value as stipulated in the Act.

Strata Property Law Project: 2018 Year-end Update
BCLI's Strata Property Law Project—Phase Two had an active year in 2018. The project issued three publications and held three public consultations. These consultations took the project's engagement with the public to new levels. They also set the stage for what will be a burst of publishing activity in 2019, which is set to be the project's final year. BCLI opened its consultation on governance in March 2018, with the publication of the Consultation Paper on Governance Issues for Stratas. This consultation paper contained 83 tentative recommendations for reform, covering a wide range of topics, including bylaws, statutory definitions, general meetings and strata-council meetings, finances, and notices and communications. The public consultation also included a three-proposal summary consultation, which spotlighted high-profile issues for reform on proxies, strata-council elections, and limitations. Publication of the consultation paper opened a three-month consultation period, which ended on 15 June 2018. During that period BCLI received 290 submissions in total (138 being responses to the full consultation and 152 to the summary consultation). This is the highest level of response to any of the consultations held in this project. A draft of the final Report on Governance Issues for Stratas is with the BCLI board of directors. Pending the board's approval, the report should be published in early 2019. Read the full article by Kevin Zakreski on the BCLI website.

Updated Versions of Land Title Forms Now In Effect
The Director of Land Titles has published updated versions of the following land title forms, in effect January 1, 2019:

Form B – Mortgage

• Item 8 Interest Mortgaged: changed field label from ‘Freehold' to ‘Fee Simple'
• Item 12 Execution: updated professional capacity from ‘Commissioner for Taking Affidavits in British Columbia' to ‘Commissioner for Taking Affidavits for British Columbia'

Form 17 – Fee Simple

• Removed nature of interest Land Title Inquiry Act Certificate

Read more on the BC Land Title and Survey website.

Wills and Estates News:

Does "Death Do Us Part"? Separating the Living from the
Dead in Family Law and Estate Litigation
A recent decision from the Court of Appeal for British Columbia outlines the rights and obligations between spouses in life and after death, and how these shift on separation. In 2013 and 2014 respectively, the Family Law Act [FLA] and the Wills, Estates and Succession Act [WESA] came into force in British Columbia. Under s. 81 of the FLA, on separation, each spouse has a right to an undivided half interest in family property. Under s. 60 of the WESA, a spouse must make adequate provision from his or her estate for the proper maintenance and support of the surviving spouse. If he or she fails to do so, the survivor may bring a claim to vary the will of the deceased. In Gibbons v. Livingston, 2018 BCCA 443, the Court clarified how these complimentary statutes define the rights and remedies available to spouses. Read the full article by Polly Storey of Clark Wilson LLP.

Credibility: Who to Believe?
Many court cases are decided on the issue of credibility. If the court does not believe one partie's evidence then in all likelihood that party will lose. The law relating to credibility was reviewed in Yung v Three Good Friends Property Holdings Inc. 2018 BCSC 1963. In Yung there were three competing versions of events presented by three main parties – Messrs. Yung, Wong and Lam. The court found Mr. Wong's recollection of the events to be extremely poor. He said he had no memory of most key events. His poor memory and the discrepancies between his discovery evidence and is evidence at trial being that I give little weight to his evidence. Mr. Lam was argumentative, evasive and nonresponsive to questions. His evidence was rambling and internally inconsistent, and was therefore inherently unbelievable. It was infused by extreme animosity towards Mr. Yung and his evidence was transparently self-serving. Mr. Yung won the case. The court found his evidence to be straightforward and internally consistent. He was subjected to extended and hostile cross-examination that bordered on abusive, with accusations of deceit and fraud. He retained his composure throughout. Read the full article by Trevor Todd on his blog disinherited – Estate Disputes and Contested Wills.

Common Pitfalls in Estate Planning for
Blended Families
The traditional concept of the nuclear family (i.e., mother, father and one or more children of a single relationship) has evolved over the years. The modern family is more complicated and may consist of parents who are in second or third relationships and who bring into a relationship children from one or more prior relationships. To further complicate the familial structure, there may also be children of the current relationship. Stepfamilies are more frequent and more diverse than ever before. In 2016, 1 in 10 children were part of a stepfamily. 6.1% of children were living with one of their biological or adoptive parents and a step-parent by marriage or common-law union. Slightly more than half of them had no half-siblings or step-siblings (i.e., any brothers and sisters were the children of the same parent: a simple stepfamily). Slightly less than half were living in a more complex situation: they had at least one half-sibling or step-sibling.[6] 37.2% of children in stepfamilies had both of their biological or adoptive parents present, and had at least one half-sibling. While many of the issues which impact blended families are similar to those of traditional nuclear families, there are others that are unique to blended families and which have the potential to create discord and mistrust among the members of the family if not handled properly. Often, there is the necessity to consider the needs of a surviving spouse and perhaps competing needs of children who are not the children of the relationship but are from a prior relationship. Read the full article by Brittany Sud on All About Estates.