![]() |
Toll Free: 1-877-727-6978 Phone: 1-250-727-6978 Fax: 1-250-727-6699 Email: info@quickscribe.bc.ca Website: www.quickscribe.bc.ca |
|
|
Vol: XIV – Issue: I – January 2015 | |
|
QUICKSCRIBE NEWS: Free Webinar Training Session on the New QS 2.0 Platform Annotated Society Act – Margaret Mason Tip of the Month: Recent Bugs Resolved
Parliament to Resume February 10th |
||
|
||
Tip: Log in to Quickscribe Online prior to clicking Reporter links. |
||
|
||
FEDERAL LEGISLATION — For notification of federal amendments, we recommend you use our RSS feed. | ||
|
||
[ Previous Reporters ] |
||
|
||
CATEGORIES |
||
COMPANY & FINANCE ENERGY & MINES FAMILY & CHILDREN FOREST & ENVIRONMENT HEALTH LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT |
LOCAL GOVERNMENT MISCELLANEOUS MOTOR VEHICLE & TRAFFIC PROPERTY & REAL ESTATE WILLS & ESTATES |
|
|
COMPANY & FINANCE | ||
Company and Finance News: TSX Venture Exchange Amends
Read the full article by Nafeesa Valli-Hasham with Clark Wilson LLP. Securities Law: 15 Hot Topics for 2015
Read the full article by Stuart Olley and Bennett K. Wong with Gowlings LLP. BC Securities – Policies & Instruments
For more information visit the BC Securities website. PST Bulletins For more information, visit the Consumer Taxes website. |
||
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Agricultural Produce Grading Act | Jan. 19/15 | by 2014 Bill 19, c. 16, section 105 only (in force by Reg 7/2015), Animal Health Act |
Business Number Regulation (388/2003) | Jan. 20/15 | by Reg 11/2015 |
Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act | Jan. 19/15 | by 2014 Bill 19, c. 16, section 106 only (in force by Reg 7/2015), Animal Health Act |
Designated Accommodation Area Tax Regulation (392/2008) | Jan. 1/15 | by Reg 179/2014 |
Feb. 1/15 | by Reg 198/2014 | |
Income Tax Act | Jan. 1/15 | by 2012 Bill 54, c. 35, section 252 only (in force by Royal Assent), Provincial Sales Tax Act |
Multilateral Instrument 11-102: Passport System (58/2008) | Jan. 11/15 | by Reg 238/2014 |
National Instrument 23-102: Use of Client Brokerage Commissions (177/2010) | Jan. 11/15 | by Reg 238/2014 |
National Instrument 24-101: Institutional Trade Matching and Settlement (64/2007) | Jan. 11/15 | by Reg 238/2014 |
National Instrument 31-103: Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations (226A/2009) | Jan. 11/15 | by Reg 238/2014 |
National Instrument 33-109: Registration Information (226B/2009) | Jan. 11/15 | by Reg 238/2014 |
National Instrument 52-107: Acceptable Accounting Principles and Auditing Standards (382/2010) | Jan. 11/15 | by Reg 238/2014 |
National Instrument 81-102: Investment Funds (2/2000) | Jan. 1/15 | by Reg 180/2014 |
National Instrument: 81-107 Independent Review Committee for Investment Funds (276/2006) | Jan. 11/15 | by Reg 238/2014 |
Rule 45-501 (BC) Mortgages (189/2000) | Jan. 11/15 | by Reg 238/2014 |
Securities Regulation (196/97) | Jan. 11/15 | by Reg 238/2014 |
ENERGY & MINES | ||
Energy and Mines News: 2014 in Review: Top 10 Legislative and Regulatory Provincial energy regulation was especially active in 2014, if not exactly coherent with each other. British Columbia introduced LNG-driven reforms in tax and facilities regulation to provide clarity to potential investors. Alberta enhanced its aboriginal consultation framework and significantly expanded the energy regulator's jurisdiction. Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontario were relatively quiet on the legislative front. Québec and New Brunswick took measures to block oil and gas development generally, and fracking in particular. On the international front, the federal government sanctioned Russia's oil and gas industry, monitored U.S. political developments on Keystone XL and weathered impacts of rapidly declining oil prices, including a deferral of the federal budget until later this year. These political issues will continue to intersect with economic and regulatory ones in 2015. For Canadian energy companies, we expect that navigating the shoals of legislation and regulations across the country will never be as important – or difficult – as in the upcoming year. Read the full bulletin by Alan L. Ross, Landon Miller, Michael A. Marion, Michael G. Massicotte, Karen A. Salmon and Rick Williams. Mount Polley Spill Taints Alaska-BC Mine Relations Commercial fishermen, native organizations and the mayors of two Alaska communities say they are worried the Red Chris mine, now being built in northern British Columbia by the same company that owns Mount Polley, poses a similar risk. Both the company and the government, however, have issued assurances that the new mine is safe. Read The Globe And Mail article. Mining Giant Takes on BC Environmental The proposed gold and copper mine, 125 kilometres southwest of Williams Lake, was undergoing a federal environmental assessment when the statements were made. Taseko lawyer Roger McConachie told court on [January 19th] the company's civil complaint involves five articles published by the non-profit organization, which were emailed to supporters and posted online starting in January 2012. Read The Vancouver Sun article. |
||
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Direction No. 1 to the Oil and Gas Commission (1/2015) | NEW Jan. 6/15 |
see Reg 1/2015 |
EGP Project Regulation (13/2015) | NEW Jan. 27/15 |
see Reg 13/2015 |
Fee, Levy and Security Regulation (8/2014) | Jan. 2/15 | by Reg 202/2014 |
Vancouver Island Natural Gas Pipeline Act | Jan. 1/15 | by 2014 Bill 4, c. 31, section 14 only (in force by Royal Assent), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act (No. 2), 2014 |
FAMILY & CHILDREN | ||
Family and Children News: Court of Appeal Releases Helpful Decision on In T.K. v R.J.H.A., the parties were married and the wife sought to move from Victoria to Toronto with the two children. The trial judge considered the wife's claim under the Divorce Act rather than the Family Law Act, and ultimately concluded that it was in the children's interests to continue with the shared parenting arrangement that had prevailed previously. The wife appealed this result. Read the full article by John-Paul Boyd and posted on JP Boyd on Family Law – the Blog. |
||
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Public Guardian and Trustee Regulation (457/99) | Jan. 19/15 | by Reg 10/2015 |
FOREST & ENVIRONMENT | ||
Forest and Environment News: BC Government Reviews Environmental The review, headed by Prince George North MLA Mike Morris, is a response, in part, to concerns raised by a trio of wildlife user groups late last year. The 43,000-member BC Wildlife Federation, BC Trappers Association and the Guide Outfitters Association of BC called on the provincial government to retake control of resource extraction practices, planning and oversight. The groups said the government's move in the past decade to rely on professionals hired by industry to make decisions on the land base, with little government oversight, has failed. The government has reduced its own professional staff that monitors resource company practices and moved to a model where they increasingly rely on professionals who work for the companies, including foresters and engineers, to ensure the environment is protected. Read The Vancouver Sun article. Environmental Appeal Board Decisions
Visit the Environmental Appeal website for more information. BC Government Mulling an Invasive Species Act to Tim Sheldan, deputy minister of Forests, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations, said [January 20th] that the existing Weed Control Act and regulations have been under internal study and that an "extensive scientific review" of invasive plant species for regulation is nearing completion. Sheldan, who was at the 10th annual forum of the Invasive Species Council of BC, in Richmond, said the 2012 Invasive Species Strategy for BC, coordinated by the council, "identified the need for a single piece of legislation ... for an Invasive Species Act." Read The Vancouver Sun article. |
||
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Agricultural Waste Control Regulation (131/92) | Jan. 19/15 | by Reg 5/2015 |
BC Timber Sales Regulation (381/2008) | Feb. 1/15 | by Reg 251/2014 |
Carbon Neutral Government Regulation (392/2008) | Jan. 1/15 | by Reg 124/2014 |
Designation and Exemption Regulation (168/90) | Jan. 19/15 | by Regs 5/2015 and 8/2015 |
Dewdrop-Rosseau Creek Wildlife Management Area Regulation (165/2013) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Fur Farm Act | REPEALED Jan. 19/15 |
by 2014 Bill 19, c. 16, section 104 (c) only (in force by Reg 7/2015), Animal Health Act |
Fur Farm Regulation (310/59) | REPEALED Jan. 19/15 |
by Reg 8/2015 |
Game Farm Act | REPEALED Jan. 19/15 |
by 2014 Bill 19, c. 16, section 104 (d) only (in force by Reg 7/2015), Animal Health Act |
Game Farm Regulation (232/91) | REPEALED Jan. 19/15 |
by Reg 5/2015 |
Green Mountain Wildlife Management Area Regulation (139/2014) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Licence Fee Regulation | REPEALED Jan. 19/15 |
by Reg 8/2015 |
Livestock Act | Jan. 19/15 | by 2014 Bill 19, c. 16, sections 108 and 109 only (in force by Reg 7/2015), Animal Health Act |
Livestock Identification Act | Jan. 19/15 | by 2014 Bill 19, c. 16, sections 110 and 111 only (in force by Reg 7/2015), Animal Health Act |
Livestock Identification Regulation (69/81) | Jan. 19/15 | by Reg 6/2015 |
McTaggart-Cowan/nsƏk'ɬniw't Wildlife Management Area (110/2013) | Jan. 19/15 | by Reg 12/2015 |
Parksville-Qualicum Beach Wildlife Management Area Regulation (107/2013) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Pound Districts Regulation (66/81) | Jan. 19/15 | by Reg 6/2015 |
Protected Areas of British Columbia Act | Jan. 19/15 | by 2014 Bill 11, c. 11, section 5 only (in force by Reg 9/2015), Protected Areas of British Columbia Amendment Act, 2014 |
Quatse Estuary Wildlife Management Area Regulation (168/2013) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
South Okanagan Wildlife Management Area Regulation (169/2013) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Tofino Mudflats Wildlife Management Area Regulation (133/97) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Wildlife Act | Jan. 19/15 | by 2014 Bill 19, c. 16, sections 115 to 117 only (in force by Reg 7/2015), Animal Health Act |
Wildlife Act Commercial Activities Areas Regulation (338/82) | Jan. 19/15 | by Regs 5/2015 and 8/2015 |
Wildlife Act General Regulation (340/82) | Jan. 19/15 | by Reg 8/2015 |
Wildlife Management Area (Pemberton Wetlands) Regulation (225/2011) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Wildlife Management Area (Stellako River) Regulation (226/2011) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Wildlife Management Areas Regulation (161/87) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Wildlife Management Areas Regulation No. 2 (319/88) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Wildlife Management Areas Regulation No. 4 (184/91) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Wildlife Management Areas Regulation No. 7 (507/94) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Wildlife Management Areas Regulation No. 8 (270/95) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Wildlife Management Areas Regulation No. 9 (131/96) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Wildlife Management Areas Regulation No. 10 (171/2000) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Wildlife Management Areas Regulation No. 11 (118/98) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Wildlife Management Areas Regulation No. 12 (119/98) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Wildlife Management Areas Regulation No. 13 (338/98) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Wildlife Management Areas Regulation No. 14 (63/2001) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Wildlife Management Areas Regulation No. 15 (115/2001) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Wildlife Management Areas Regulation No. 16 (116/2001) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Wildlife Management Areas (Roberts Bank) Regulation (155/2011) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Wildlife Management Areas (Serpentine and Bert Brink) Regulation (158/2009) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
Wildlife Management Areas Regulation (Squamish Estuary) (47/2007) | REPEALED Jan. 21/15 |
by Reg 12/2015 |
HEALTH | ||
Health News: Brain Injury Litigation Today BC Looks to Crack Down on Bogus Organic Consultation on Distribution, Ground Water
Guidance Document for Determining Ground Water at Risk of Containing Pathogens (GARP), Version 2 Drinking Water Treatment Objectives (Microbiological) for Ground Water Supplies in British Columbia, Version 1 British Columbia Guidelines (Microbiological) for Maintaining Water Quality within Distribution Systems (Secondary Disinfection), Version 1 A brief overview of all three guidance documents and the consultation process can be found here. |
||
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Animal Disease Control Act | REPEALED Jan. 19/15 |
by 2014 Bill 19, c. 16, section 104 (a) only (in force by Reg 7/2015), Animal Health Act |
Animal Disease Control Regulation (150/66) | REPEALED Jan. 19/15 |
by Reg 6/2015 |
Animal Health Act | NEW Jan. 19/15 |
c. 16 [SBC 2014], Bill 19, sections 1 to 34 (1), 35 to 103 only (in force by Reg 7/2015), Animal Health Act |
Animal Products and Byproducts Regulation (2/2015) | NEW Jan. 19/15 |
see Reg 2/2015 |
Bee Act | REPEALED Jan. 19/15 |
by 2003 Bill 11, c. 7, section 4 only (in force by Reg 7/2015), Animal Health Act |
Bee Quarantine District Regulation (415/90) | REPEALED Jan. 19/15 |
by Reg 3/2015 |
Bee Regulation (3/2015) | NEW Jan. 19/15 |
see Reg 3/2015 (replaces B.C. Regs. 373/88 and 415/90) |
Bee Regulation (373/88) | REPEALED Jan. 19/15 |
by Reg 3/2015 |
Enforcement Regulation (4/2015) | NEW Jan. 19/15 |
see Reg 4/2015 |
Fur Farm Act | REPEALED Jan. 19/15 |
by 2014 Bill 19, c. 16, section 104 (c) only (in force by Reg 7/2015), Animal Health Act |
Fur Farm Regulation (8/2015) | NEW Jan. 19/15 |
see Reg 8/2015 (replaces B.C. Reg. 310/59) |
Game Farm Regulation (5/2015) | NEW Jan. 19/15 |
see Reg 5/2015 (replaces B.C. Reg. 232/91) |
Game Farm Regulation (232/91) | REPEALED Jan. 19/15 |
by Reg 5/2015 |
Livestock Licensing Regulation (6/2015) | NEW Jan. 19/15 |
see Reg 6/2015 |
Medical and Health Care Services Regulation (426/97) | Jan. 1/15 | by Reg 144/2014 |
Milk Industry Act | Jan. 19/15 | by 2014 Bill 19, c. 16, section 112 only (in force by Reg 7/2015), Animal Health Act |
Milk Industry Standards Regulation (464/81) | Jan. 19/15 | by Reg 7/2015 |
Reportable and Notifiable Disease Regulation (7/2015) | NEW Jan. 19/15 |
see Reg 7/2015 |
Veterinary Drugs Act | Jan. 19/15 | by 2014 Bill 19, c. 16, section 114 only (in force by Reg 7/2015), Animal Health Act |
Veterinary Drug and Medicated Feed Regulation (47/82) | Jan. 19/15 | by Regs 6/2015 and 8/2015 |
LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT | ||
Labour and Employment News: Essential Services Law Deemed By a 5-2 majority, the high court granted an appeal by the Saskatchewan Federation of Labour of the province's controversial essential services law that restricts who can strike. The decision was immediately hailed by labour groups. "Today's decision levels the playing field for workers by placing checks on the power of governments, as employers, to legislate unfair essential services arrangements that tip the scales in management's favour," Canadian Labour Congress president Hassan Yussuff said in a news release. The ruling will affect public service unions in provinces across the country. Read the CBC article. It's a Two-Way Street: Employees are Required
Read the full article by Dave J.G. McKechnie, Adam Kaukas, Tyson Gratton and Linda Yang, Student-at-Law with McMillan. The Right to Refuse Dangerous Work Employers Can Dismiss Workers without "The decision in Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited will radically change the legal effect of the Code on the dismissal of non-unionized employees in the federal sector," says Barry Fisher, a mediator and arbitrator on employment matters. According to Fisher, many employment lawyers had assumed that without cause dismissals for other than economic reasons were "unjust" dismissals. Under the CLC, employees who are unjustly dismissed can be reinstated; employees who are dismissed without cause but not "unjustly" are only entitled to severance pay. The Wilson case involved an AECL employee who was dismissed without cause. He received six months' severance pay. An adjudicator ruled that he had been unjustly dismissed. But AECL appealed, and in 2013, the Federal Court ruled that the adjudicator was wrong. The Federal Court of Appeal agreed that a dismissal without cause was not necessarily "unjust". Read the Financial Post article. |
||
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Employment and Assistance for Persons with Disabilities Regulation (265/2002) | Jan. 1/15 | by Reg 226/2014 |
Workers Compensation Act | Jan. 1/15 | by 2014 Bill 17, c. 14, section 144 only (in force by Reg 257/2014), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2014 |
LOCAL GOVERNMENT | ||
Local Government News: City of Campbell River Successful against Challenge [Stewart McDannold Stuart] represented the City against the challenge to its Tax Rates Bylaw commenced by TimberWest Forest Corporation. The Bylaw under attack established two tax rates for Class 7 Managed Forest Lands, one rate for lands that had been brought within the City by way of a boundary extension in 2004, and a higher rate for other Class 7 lands including those owned by TimberWest. When the municipal boundary extension request was approved by the Province in 2004, the conditions of approval under section 14 of the Local Government Act included that the tax rate for the Class 7 Managed Forest Lands brought into the City was to remain the same as the rural taxation rate for managed forest lands. For many years following the boundary extension, all Class 7 Managed Forest Lands within the City were taxed at or very close to the capped rural taxation rates. As part of its five year financial plan for 2014 to 2018, the City determined that it wished to phase in a tax rate increase for Class 7 Managed Forest Lands in order to reach the provincial average for that class. This meant that the Class 7 Managed Forest Lands not subject to the tax rate limitation, including TimberWest's, would be taxed at a higher rate than the lands brought within the City as a result of the 2004 boundary extension. Read the full article by Robert Macquisten with Stewart McDannold Stewart LLP. Report Supports Local Government The report (Getting Serious About Crime Reduction) by the Blue Ribbon Panel highlights the need for a collaborative approach to address and promote more effective cooperation in crime reduction activities at the provincial and community levels and recommends that the following actions be undertaken: Read the full article on the UBCM website. Public Hearing Procedures: A New Wrinkle |
||
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Bee Act | REPEALED Jan. 19/15 |
by 2003 Bill 11, c. 7, section 4 only (in force by Reg 3/2015), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2003 |
Bee Quarantine District Regulation (415/90) | REPEALED Jan. 19/15 |
by Reg 3/2015 |
Bee Regulation (373/88) | REPEALED Jan. 19/15 |
by Reg 3/2015 |
Farm Practices Protection (Right to Farm) Act | Jan. 19/15 | by 2014 Bill 19, c. 16, section 107 only (in force by Reg 7/2015), Animal Health Act |
Medical and Health Care Services Regulation (426/97) | Jan. 1/15 | by Reg 144/2014 |
Ministry of Agriculture and Food Act | Jan. 19/15 | by 2014 Bill 19, c. 16, section 113 only (in force by Reg 7/2015), Animal Health Act |
South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority Act | Jan. 1/15 | by 2014 Bill 22, c. 21, section 12 only (in force by Reg 131/2014), South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority Amendment Act, 2014 |
MISCELLANEOUS | ||
Miscellaneous News: Province to Review Heritage Law The government announced this week that it was moving to resolve the dispute by partnering with First Nations and the Nature Conservancy of Canada to buy the property near Saltspring Island. The price was not disclosed. But while archeologists and First Nations praised the move, they warned that the government will face further conflicts unless it deals with the underlying issues. "Even if Grace Islet is now resolved or will be resolved through such means – and again that's great – this has nothing to help resolve other cases elsewhere," said George Nicholas, a Simon Fraser University archeologist. Nicholas heads the Intellectual Property Issues in Cultural Heritage team of lawyers, anthropologists, human rights specialists, and heritage scholars that recently called on Canadian governments to better protect First Nations burial grounds. Read the Times Colonist article. BC Laws Create Complex Issues in Honouring The cemetery sits on the edge of the waterfront in a residential neighbourhood that covers what was once a busy aboriginal community. Within a few minutes' walk from Ross Bay, remnants of that earlier settlement remain in the form of stone cairns where the Coast Salish people buried their dead 500 or more years ago. There is a troubling difference between the manner in which we preserve and protect the dead on either side of the cemetery's hedge. Read The Globe and Mail article. |
||
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
There were no amendments this month. | ||
MOTOR VEHICLE & TRAFFIC | ||
Motor Vehicle and Traffic News: Motorist Faulted for Crash After Driving In [a recent] case (Roy v. McGinnis) the Plaintiff was driving a motor home which had stopped at a T intersection approaching a highway. The Plaintiff attempted to turn left on the highway. The area was covered in dense fog and visibility was poor. The Plaintiff failed to appreciate that the Defendant was travelling down the highway as the Plaintiff entered the intersection. Both motorists were found equally to blame for the crash, the Plaintiff for entering an intersection when it was unsafe to do so and the Defendant for failing to drive safely given the conditions. In reaching a conclusion of equal blame Mr. Justice Groves provided the following reasons: Read the full article posted by Erik Magraken on the BC Injury Law blog. CVSE Bulletins
For more information please visit the CVSE website. |
||
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Emission Inspection Exemption Regulation (320/92) | Jan. 1/15 | by Reg 267/2014 |
Motor Vehicle Act Regulations (26/58) | Jan. 1/15 | by Reg 227/2014 |
South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority Act | Jan. 1/15 | by 2014 Bill 22, c. 21, section 12 only (in force by Reg 131/2014), South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority Amendment Act, 2014 |
PROPERTY & REAL ESTATE | ||
Property and Real Estate News: Family in Contempt Must Sell Condo The case, which first erupted in 2006, involves a family in a squabble with their strata council over a parking stall. The 2-1 majority said [January 27th] troublesome litigants Cheng-Fu Bea and Huei-Chi Yang Bea deserved to lose their home because of their incorrigible abuse of court processes battling their neighbours in the small Port Coquitlam development. This dispute began after the Brittany Park strata council at 2378 Rindall Ave. passed a parking bylaw in August 2006. The Beas objected, refusing to park their vehicle in the assigned stall. Years of multiple proceedings in two levels of court, all essentially asserting the same complaint, followed. Read The Vancouver Sun article. New Annotations posted to Strata Property Act What Can Stratas Do If a Resolution Until December 2013, there was very little a strata could do. The only legal remedy available was under section 165 of the Strata Property Act (the "SPA") pursuant to which a court could order a strata council to perform its duty to repair and maintain common property. This was a cumbersome route and the courts are reluctant to force stratas to do things against their collective will. Read the full article by Peter Roberts with Lawson Lundell LLP. |
||
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
There were no amendments this month. | ||
WILLS & ESTATES | ||
Wills and Estates News: It's Time for the Court of Appeal to Revisit its Formulation The wills variation provisions are in Division 6, Part 4 of the Wills, Estates and Succession Act, but were until recently in the Wills Variation Act, and all of the cases referred to were decided under the Wills Variation Act. The change in legislation does not affect the analysis. Applying wills variation legislation is difficult because the courts are required to find a balance between the purposes of the legislation in recognizing that a will-maker usually has legal or moral obligations to his or her spouse and children, while respecting the right of a will-maker to make his or her own decisions about who will inherit his or her property. The legislation allows the court to consider evidence of the will-maker's reasons for making the provisions he or she did in the will. In striving to find a balance, the British Columbia Court of Appeal has formulated a principle that if the will-maker's reasons are rational and valid, then unless the spouse or child can show financial need, the will should not be varied. Read the full article by Stan Rule on his blog Rule of Law. Court Orders a Letter to be Effective as the This is noteworthy because the dispensing power (section 58 of WESA) is new to British Columbia. The August 2014 issue of Your Estate Matters addressed section 58 generally. Despite being in effect since March 31, 2014, there are no published cases in British Columbia that address how and when the Court should exercise its dispensing power. As a result, a [look was made] to other provinces with similar legislation. Read the full article by Amy Mortimore with Clark Wilson LLP. |
||
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Public Guardian and Trustee Regulation (457/99) | Jan. 19/15 | by Reg 10/2015 |
The content of this document is intended for client use only. Redistribution to anyone other than Quickscribe clients (without the prior written consent of Quickscribe) is strictly prohibited. QUICKSCRIBE SERVICES LTD. UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS EMAIL SERVICE To unsubscribe from this service, click here. |